Im going to lose it

Or maybe I’m just a bigot because I don’t think you should be accepted for having a crush on Judy Hopps

Bruh that’s actual zoophilia
It’s wayyy different.
But sure, get mad at somebody for liking a fictional character.

According to your comments and what I’ve heard, no. Judy Hopps is a “cartoon character” or “fictional character.” Not real. That falls in line with this weird sexual identity you’re trying to pass off as real.

Yet that’s also known as zoophilia.
Yes, I’m attracted to women, and a dog could be female. Does that mean I’m attracted to dogs?
NO.
Do you see your logic?

You’re missing the point. You said it means you’re not attracted to anybody. Nobody. Except for fictional characters. And the example I chose is Judy Hopps. I could use any fictional character and the concept would sound just as stupid.

Yes, you are attracted to certain cartoon characters.
How about you ask the actual fictoromantic instead of me?

Doesn’t make it a sexuality. Its not real.

“This is how I fee-”
“It’s not real.”
“What? I am literally attra-”
“LALALA I CANT HEAR YOU ITS NOT REAL”

It literally isn’t real.

I think grass is though.

Who are you to say a sexuality that you aren’t isn’t real?
That’s like saying grass isn’t real because you live in a desert.

The thing you’re simping for isn’t real, therefore your sexuality isn’t real.

It’s just as idiotic as if I was sexually attracted to Big Foot.

Bro
They are attracted to the character as if it was real.

Which is honestly pretty sad.

And why is that?
They don’t feel attraction to normal people, why should they be sad?

Because (wait for it, WAIT FOR IT) it’s not real. No matter how much you want it to be.

Nobody cares

how tf is being attracted to fictional characters apart of the 'asexuality spectrum'
it's LITERALLY attraction