Imgflip Logo Icon

No Nudity rule overhaul proposal

No Nudity rule overhaul proposal | PG13 CONTENT IS PORN! NO NUDITY (RULE AS WRITTEN); NO NUDITY OVERHAUL: IMGFLIP IS NOT A WEBSITE FOR IMAGERY EXPLICITLY DEPICTING SEXUAL ACTIVITY. ALL GENITALS, ANUSES AND FEMALE NIPPLES MUST BE FULLY COVERED. PEOPLE IN BIKINIS OR OTHER MINIMAL CLOTHING ARE OK IF ALL AFOREMENTIONED PARTS ARE STILL FULLY COVERED, BUT THEY MUST BE MARKED NSFW. HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT ARTWORK WITH NUDITY IS OK BUT MUST BE MARKED NSFW. HEALTH OR EDUCATIONAL CONTENT WITH NUDITY IS OK BUT MUST BE MARKED NSFW. NO NUDITY ADDENDUM V1.1: FULLY NUDE MALE INFANTS AND PARTIALLY NUDE FEMALE TODDLERS SEEM TO BE FINE. ROCK CARVINGS OF PEOPLE BUGGERING LIVESTOCK ARE OKAY AS LONG BOTH PARTIES SEEM TO BE ENJOYING IT. CAVE PAINTINGS OF ORGIES ARE PERMISSIBLE AS LONG AS THEY CARBON DATE TO AT LEAST 4,000BCE. CLASSICAL ARTWORK SUCH AS THAT FOUND IN THE LOUVRE IS ACCEPTABLE WITH A SIGNED PERMISSION SLIP FROM YOUR MOTHER. MODERN ARTWORK COMPOSED IN A CLASSICAL STYLE WILL LIKELY SLIP BY UNRECOGNIZED, BECAUSE “ARTISTIC WORK” IS CODE FOR “ART THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS MADE DURING THE RENAISSANCE”. TRANSLUCENT CLOTHING IS ACCEPTABLE, EVEN IF IT SHOWS MORE THAN SOME FULL NUDITY. BODY PAINT THAT LOOKS LIKE CLOTHES ALSO COUNTS AS CLOTHING FOR PURPOSES OF COVERING BODY PARTS. IMAGES FROM NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC OR SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE DEPICTING PARTIALLY OR FULLY NAKED HUMANS OF ANY AGE OR GENDER ARE ALLOWABLE PENDING THE OUTCOME OF A COIN TOSS. STEREOGRAM IMAGES ARE OKAY BECAUSE THEY BASICALLY LOOK LIKE SILHOUETTES. SUBLIMINAL IMAGERY IS PROBABLY OKAY UNLESS SOMEONE COMPLAINS ABOUT IT. LOW RESOLUTION IMAGES ARE FINE AS LONG AS THE RESULT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF VIEWING A HI-RES IMAGE WITH 20/70 VISION. STICK PORN IS ALRIGHT SINCE STICK FIGURES LOOK THE SAME NAKED AS FULLY CLOTHED. AND FINALLY, THE TERM “SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE” IS BEING PURGED BECAUSE EVEN IF IT DID HAVE MEANING, IT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE DETERMINATION OF ACCEPTABLE VS UNACCEPTABLE NUDITY. | image tagged in memes,expanding brain,tos,imgflip,no nudity,not my job | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
362 views • 11 upvotes • Made by Hannibal_Lecher 1 year ago in imgflip
memesexpanding braintosimgflipno nuditynot my job
Expanding Brain memeCaption this Meme
7 Comments
Hannibal_Lecher
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Of course this still leaves a plethora of gray areas, but it's a fair sight better than the current dumpster fire of a "no nudity" rule that allows for umpteen forms of nudity while pretending to carve out exceptions that it doesn't actually allow for.

How can you communicate something you don't understand?
How can you enforce something you can't communicate?
Clearly define your rules with coherent language and apply them consistently.
If this is asking too much, too bad--I didn't ask for these rules, I'm merely demanding they reflect their true intention.
And I'M the bad guy here? Either say what you mean or gtfo.
This isn't even supposed to be my job...grrr
Whatever, this'll probably get ignored even if it does get posted. May as well talk to myself...best company I usually find anyway. Bah!
Modda
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
In case you haven't noticed, even when not vague in the slightest the TOS rules are improvised on the spot. I've gotten timers for using common templates used a gazillion times a day or saying "Did you just assume my gender?" or for asking Holla if his 45yo self likes popsicles after he accused someone of being a pedo with popicles in the basement to lure kids. I got 24. His comment is still on this site.
Hannibal_Lecher
2 ups, 1y
Aye, individual streams are an apt analog of our 50 nation-states and their myriad opposing rules being applied in parallel. That I'm used to. My gripe is when rules with little coherent meaning are leveraged against seemingly permissible content on my own fuxking stream.

The site gods would be better off going with the Motion Picture Association film rating system's description for pg-13, or ESRB's description for Teen. Both cover the exact same age cutoff as imgflip and both are suitably vague and subjective. At least then there'd be some truth in advertising. If at the end of the day their policy boils down to "meh?", they should do everyone a favor and fxcking own it.

And yes, niche streams tend to have their own...let's say "culture and personality". There are reasons I stay away from certain states, too.
Antares-soldier
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
How long did it take to write this 💀
Hannibal_Lecher
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Less time than it took to boff your mom. 😉
Antares-soldier
4 ups, 1y
*yro'ue | image tagged in yro'ue | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
1 up, 1y
not reading allat
Expanding Brain memeCaption this Meme
NSFW
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
PG13 CONTENT IS PORN! NO NUDITY (RULE AS WRITTEN); NO NUDITY OVERHAUL: IMGFLIP IS NOT A WEBSITE FOR IMAGERY EXPLICITLY DEPICTING SEXUAL ACTIVITY. ALL GENITALS, ANUSES AND FEMALE NIPPLES MUST BE FULLY COVERED. PEOPLE IN BIKINIS OR OTHER MINIMAL CLOTHING ARE OK IF ALL AFOREMENTIONED PARTS ARE STILL FULLY COVERED, BUT THEY MUST BE MARKED NSFW. HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT ARTWORK WITH NUDITY IS OK BUT MUST BE MARKED NSFW. HEALTH OR EDUCATIONAL CONTENT WITH NUDITY IS OK BUT MUST BE MARKED NSFW. NO NUDITY ADDENDUM V1.1: FULLY NUDE MALE INFANTS AND PARTIALLY NUDE FEMALE TODDLERS SEEM TO BE FINE. ROCK CARVINGS OF PEOPLE BUGGERING LIVESTOCK ARE OKAY AS LONG BOTH PARTIES SEEM TO BE ENJOYING IT. CAVE PAINTINGS OF ORGIES ARE PERMISSIBLE AS LONG AS THEY CARBON DATE TO AT LEAST 4,000BCE. CLASSICAL ARTWORK SUCH AS THAT FOUND IN THE LOUVRE IS ACCEPTABLE WITH A SIGNED PERMISSION SLIP FROM YOUR MOTHER. MODERN ARTWORK COMPOSED IN A CLASSICAL STYLE WILL LIKELY SLIP BY UNRECOGNIZED, BECAUSE “ARTISTIC WORK” IS CODE FOR “ART THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS MADE DURING THE RENAISSANCE”. TRANSLUCENT CLOTHING IS ACCEPTABLE, EVEN IF IT SHOWS MORE THAN SOME FULL NUDITY. BODY PAINT THAT LOOKS LIKE CLOTHES ALSO COUNTS AS CLOTHING FOR PURPOSES OF COVERING BODY PARTS. IMAGES FROM NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC OR SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE DEPICTING PARTIALLY OR FULLY NAKED HUMANS OF ANY AGE OR GENDER ARE ALLOWABLE PENDING THE OUTCOME OF A COIN TOSS. STEREOGRAM IMAGES ARE OKAY BECAUSE THEY BASICALLY LOOK LIKE SILHOUETTES. SUBLIMINAL IMAGERY IS PROBABLY OKAY UNLESS SOMEONE COMPLAINS ABOUT IT. LOW RESOLUTION IMAGES ARE FINE AS LONG AS THE RESULT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF VIEWING A HI-RES IMAGE WITH 20/70 VISION. STICK PORN IS ALRIGHT SINCE STICK FIGURES LOOK THE SAME NAKED AS FULLY CLOTHED. AND FINALLY, THE TERM “SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE” IS BEING PURGED BECAUSE EVEN IF IT DID HAVE MEANING, IT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE DETERMINATION OF ACCEPTABLE VS UNACCEPTABLE NUDITY.