Imgflip Logo Icon

DEVESTATING Fact Libs don't want you to know!

DEVESTATING Fact Libs don't want you to know! | UNLIKE YOU SNOWFLAKES, I AM NOT SO EASILY OFFENDED. BIDEN GOT MORE VOTES THAN TRUMP. | image tagged in maga snowflake | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
116 views 4 upvotes Made by whistlelock 1 year ago in politics
MAGA Snowflake memeCaption this Meme
25 Comments
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
or...
The Biden Team found 81 Million of them because he is more Popular than Hillary ever could be
1 up, 1y
I mean, you're not wrong. He is better liked and got more votes.
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
If Biden got 81 million votes they wouldn't be working so hard to derail Trump's campaign...
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Or. Just gonna throw this out there.

The admitted fraudster committed a lot of crimes and now the consequences of his actions are coming due.
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Sorry... the Durham report proved everything stemmed from dems cheating... and their allies in the government bureaucracy aided them...
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Oh, the Durham "nothing burger" report?

Which section proves this again?
0 ups, 1y
You should read it...
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
PURE BS and you know it
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Straight Facts. No cap.
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
yes
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
2 replies
FOX is the good cops in GOOD COP / BAD COP the UNIPARTY of DEMrats
1 up, 1y
There's a reason why they won't let a proper hearing happen... they won't let the American public see the evidence presented in an open courtroom...
1 up, 1y,
3 replies
It's weird they had to pay out so much money for lying about the election voter fraud.

You'd think they'd be able to prove it, if it were true.
0 ups, 1y
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-4/clause-1/
[deleted]
0 ups, 1y
YOU don't understand what FED dollar is do you.. The NWO can print as much as they want.. hell they don't even print it now they just add or subtract zeroes their accounts.. I'm sure fox was returned their digits by the fed
0 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Do Tell us the logic behind 147 Republicans voting not to certify Pennsylvania nor Arizona...
(and why those states that sent two electoral college groups, did that? Georgia, Michigan)
What is the deal there. Article II, section 4 of the US constitution. Do elaborate how those four states hastily did a run around and cite the excuse of the Lockdowns to hurriedly change their existing Voting Regulations without their own representatives of the people legislating to do such? Do go on in detail... to support your logic with good reasons errrrr excuses to ignore Article II section 4??? If the Dems did not Steal the election, and they may not have, they more than likely, some could argue most certainly Cheated the rules laid out in the Constitution and got away with it.
0 ups, 1y,
2 replies
You've got a lot going on in this post. It may take several responses to address them. You'll need to clarify what you mean about Article 2.

Let's start with the fake electors.

None of the 7 states that had "alternate electors" certified 2 groups. The state legislatures only certified 1 group of electors.

Arizona is currently investigating the sources behind their specific group.

The Michigan group has been charged.

it sounds like you're questioning how voting is handled in the US? I'm not sure.

But other than voting rights and enforcing campaign finances the Federal government has little impact on voting procedures. Most elections are planned out by the States and then run at the county level.

Ballotpedia has a great series of links to explain it: https://ballotpedia.org/Who_runs_elections_in_the_United_States%3F_(2020)

So, they didn't do a "run around" on the Constitution since it's up to the states and down to the counties to run their elections. They changed how they wanted to do it based on the pandemic.
0 ups, 1y
****
I must completely apologize. I meant Article One Section Four, not article 2 section 4.

Sorry for the confusion, and I take full responsibility for my side of the misinterpretation... Maybe the clarification can finally not be so confusing nor misleading on my part. I did not intend to cite the impeachment clause article 2 section 4....
Instead the elections stipulation very clearly is cited in Article ONE, section 4

Here is the link at Congress.gov ...certainly not balotpedia twits.
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Oh boy, is there a misinterpretation here. Allow me to clarify a bit further:

Please Read Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. Ballotpedia does not address this.

I'm certainly Not "questioning how voting is handled in the US", just appalled by how Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan cheated their own people by making hasty changes leading up to the 2020 election, within months of it, and none of the changes were made by their state legislators. Some were changed by APPOINTED people, not ELECTED people, as is specifically addressed in Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
That indeed is a "run around." and precisely the alleged one to which is identified here.

The last line of yours is the most coherent: "They changed how they 'wanted' to do it based on the pandemic" Thank you, sincerely. You make my point for me.
WHERE IS THIS ADDRESSED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION???

What is so difficult to understand that this is not okay. Uh, people are getting sick, so, uh we are going to hastily alter the way we vote into very questionable procedures without involving our ELECTED OFFICIALS in a full LEGISLATURE VOTE.

Those very changes you cite are unconstitutional, because only THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES THEREOF may make changes. One cannot say the oh, we can't have a vote on it for the pandemic, because many other states conducted State Legislators meetings and votes by ZOOM calls. (Both their State Houses and State Senates as locally elected legislative bodies)

Allowing a few ignorant states (identified above) GOVERNORS executive orders or State Supreme Courts (Politically Appointed judges) to make "changes because of the pandemic" violates Article II sect. 4. Hope that SPELLS IT OUT FOR YOU and anyone else

By allegedly CHEATING the U.S. Constitution & their own people, they cheated the value of the elections held by the other 46 states and what actually Unifies those 46 with the 4.

Total Chaos. More akin to a Marxist-democracy, rather than a democratic-republic that the USA has been until now.

This is not the first pandemic. Check 1918. This is just the first one where Elections: via voting laws and voting machines, and counting apparatus were introduced hastily, and under duress, completely created by the STATIST LOCKDOWN MANDATES imposed on the formerly free citizens.
1 up, 1y,
3 replies
I don't think you know what Article II, Section 4 covers.

Maybe you should take some time to review what that section covers?

If not, it's solely about impeachment. Nothing about voting.

However, Article 2, Section 1 does cover the electoral college so maybe that's what you meant?

Here's the relevant text: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: ... "

See the part where it says "equal to"?

That means it's a finite and specific number. Now, I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but it seems to me that appointing alternate electors at the same time as regular electors is a violation of the Constitution.

Since you can only have a fixed amount of electors, and having more than that fixed amount is a violation.

But maybe you meant Article 1, Section 2? Because that does cover voting. It says, and I quote, "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof:..."

You can see that the Constitution is pushing the responsibility of running the elections to the states.

So, I dunno what you're talking about. You keep mentioning Article II sect. 4, but that is solely about impeachment. You keep talking about how changing elections at the state level is unconstitutional, but the constitution clearly pushes the responsibility of elections to the states.
[deleted]
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
0 ups, 1y
"Times and places of elections is up to the Legislators thereof...."

q. Is it up to the Governor thereof????
a. No

q. Is it up to the State Supreme court thereof????
a. No

q.Does it have a special clause in case of a pandemic and people are fearful of getting
their grandparents sick while voting? So, let's mail in ballots and count them a week later?
a. No
0 ups, 1y
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-4/clause-1/
0 ups, 1y
I stand corrected... I meant Article I, Section 4.
I indeed, did not know what Article II, Section 4 covers as you astutely stated.
Honest error on my part... Thanks for pointing that out.
0 ups, 1y
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-4/clause-1/
MAGA Snowflake memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
UNLIKE YOU SNOWFLAKES, I AM NOT SO EASILY OFFENDED. BIDEN GOT MORE VOTES THAN TRUMP.