Following the science with a scale model of the atmosphere...

A 50 parts per million increase in CO2 attributed to mankind burning fossil fuels is said to destroy the planet. We must "follow the science!!!" This is a 1/100th scale drawing of the atmosphere which is 79% nitrogen, 20% oxygen and the remaining 1% is mostly argon and other gases such as helium, ozone, methane, CO2, etc. each dot represents 100 parts per million.
CO2 is colorless, odorless and transparent, so it is fascinating that a transparent gas is "reflecting" heat back to earth. The law of equilibrium then would prove that an equal amount of heat would be reflected back to space.
CO2 is not uniformly distributed through the atmosphere, with heaviest concentrations downwind of rain forests and areas with heavy concentrations of decaying plant matter (up to 1800 ppm). CO2 is also most concentrated within about 1500 feet of earth's surface, not teh upper reaches of the troposphere, conveniently where plants use photosynthesis to liberate the two oxygen atoms from the "deadly" carbon which is converted into sugars that make up the structure of the plant. The carbon based lifeform plant then feeds other carbon based lifeforms which make up the ecosystem of the planet earth.
That's just proven science.

Proven science: 20,000 years ago 15,000 feet of sat on top of what is now New York City. It did not melt because cavemen were driving Hummers.

It was the oppressive white neaderthals fault. Otherwise that refreshig ice would still be there to absorb the smoke.

Maybe the Neanderthals drank a lot of frozen margaritas.

stupid grug in big village drink expensive chocolate drink, cost many seashells to buy. Us small village grug drink squished berry drink, not expensive, cost not many shells.

It's somewhat of a self-correcting system. Natural carbon is measured in giga tons. Kerry is such an idiot he thinks we can get rid of it all. Who cares if all the plants die from lack of co2, we will be dead from lack of oxygen before we starve. I often wonder if they are that stupid or just willing to lie so they can collect trillions of dollars.

Can you say wealth redistribution.

I count 100 by 100, should be 10,000 dots if my Chinese calculator is working. LOL.

Ackchually I've made a number of mathematical errors over the years trying to show how insignificant the amounts of CO2 and methane that are supposed to be destroying the planet. It's really about destroying freedom.