Lessons in failure.

Except video, audio, money trail….

no, no - not Trump. i'm saying they got nothing on Biden.

Except video, audio, a money trail…all the things they DON’T have on trump. It’s called evidence.

you may be letting your wants and hopes diddle with your perception of reality. the resulting misalignment between reality and your perception of it could be responsible for these feelings of injustice and outrage. now, while we can each adjust our own reality by taking action steps to change our circumstances, there's not much you can do at this point to save poor old Trump. he messed up badly and continues to do so, and that'll have consequences.

you probably noticed over the last six years that Republicans in federal government have a kind of knee-jerk tendency to claim Democrats are guilty of crimes as a kind of defense for their own. after they make those claims, they scramble for evidence that doesn't seem to exist. maybe they believe that it does exist because, and I admit I'm not a trained psychiatrist, they think the Dems are just like them, i.e., weasels with plenty of skeletons in their closets. I'm not saying the Dems are saints. but not as bad as the Republicans.

so here's an action step we can all take: stop believing politicians and biased media. instead you should go with the hard facts. there are plenty of audio and video recordings of Trump incriminating himself. there are plenty of audio and video recordings of Biden being responsible and doing his best, even if you don't agree with his politics. start with those and then let's see what happens in court. later on you can change your username to 'highlyskeptical', and then 'openminded', and ultimately 'sawthelight' or 'thanksheavencanwait'.

Except the part about believing politicians. Of course, you have convicted the first non-politician since Reagan on zero evidence except the accusations of career politicians….

that's an ironic choice of meme, kid. if you habitually stick to the facts and are careful not to over-interpret them, your record of rightness is fairly guaranteed to be excellent (it's one of the not-very-hidden secrets of the universe) ( :

Little tip. Trying to sound smart by spouting pseudo logical BS just does the opposite. We have video of Joe Biden using his position to halt investigations into his corruption. He’s been caught in a $10 million bribery scheme. We know he’s a paid asset of the Chinese and Russian governments. We know he initiated the scheme to spy on trump. He is very rich despite having never held a real job. I could go on.

well there's yer problem. print this out and keep a copy in your wallet. whenever you're feeling confused, check it to see which witch is which.

Wow. For somebody who claims the facts are all on his side, you certainly have nothing but BS to add to the conversation.

i'm sorry if that seemed out of line. it's just that after i see that someone is irredeemable, my interest in conversation drops because i see i'm wasting my time.

Not out of line. You just claimed that there is evidence against trump and none against Biden. When I challenged you, you wrote a bunch of incoherent nonsense. When I supported it with facts you did the same. I don’t need to be redeemed because I am on the right side of the issue. You can be redeemed simply by seeking and accepting the truth.

"We have video of Joe Biden using his position to halt investigations into his corruption."

I'd like to see that video with my own eyes. Please post a link.

"He’s been caught in a $10 million bribery scheme. We know he’s a paid asset of the Chinese and Russian governments. We know he initiated the scheme to spy on trump."

Please source evidence proving those accusations. I mean... it seems to me that was there hard, incontrovertible proof of any of them, that's all FOX would talk about 24/7 -but they don't. Rather, FOX's talking heads seem to do nothing but spout innuendo and allegation.

"He is very rich despite having never held a real job."

I tend to agree that Senator/Representative isn't a real job, likewise POTUS/V-P. However, the facts don't support your assertion:

"In 1968, Biden clerked at a Wilmington law firm headed by prominent local Republican William Prickett and, he later said, "thought of myself as a Republican".[34][35] He disliked incumbent Democratic Delaware governor Charles L. Terry's conservative racial politics and supported a more liberal Republican, Russell W. Peterson, who defeated Terry in 1968.[34] Biden was recruited by local Republicans but registered as an Independent because of his distaste for Republican presidential candidate Richard Nixon.[34]

In 1969, Biden practiced law, first as a public defender and then at a firm headed by a locally active Democrat[36][34] who named him to the Democratic Forum, a group trying to reform and revitalize the state party;[37] Biden subsequently reregistered as a Democrat.[34] He and another attorney also formed a law firm.[36] Corporate law did not appeal to him, and criminal law did not pay well.[16] He supplemented his income by managing properties.[38]"

Did some talking head/web-based propaganda outlet make that claim or do you categorize attorney-at-law and property management as "not real jobs" as well?