Imgflip Logo Icon

6/4/1989

6/4/1989 | Today is the 34th anniversary
of the Tiananmen Square massacre.
Never forget. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
321 views 10 upvotes Made by Fak_u_lol 2 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
18 Comments
2 ups, 2y
I remember it was a question on the Social credit test when it became a meme in late 2021

they tried making us deny the massacre
1 up, 2y
The square massacre was crazy never forget who loss everything for their fight for freedom
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
Psst… have you ever wondered why there isn’t any footage shown of the “peaceful” Tiananmen Square protesters other than the tank man? Yeah, me neither. Here’s a short clip demonstrating just how “peaceful” they actually were.

3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Here’s also low-quality footage of Tiananmen Square protestors “peacefully” stoning PLA truck drivers to death (part 1 of 3)

3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Tiananmen Square protestors “peacefully” stoning PLA truck drivers to death (part 2 of 3)

3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Tiananmen Square protestors “peacefully” stoning PLA truck drivers to death (part 3 of 3)



(Hmm, I now wonder why the Chinese government would possibly want to crack down on these protestors? 🤔)
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
And just to really hammer in the point that the Western narrative of “peaceful” protestors may not be all too factual, here’s one of many pictures of them killing soldiers in cold blood.

(WARNING!! DO NOT CLICK IF YOU’RE EASILY DISTURBED BY GORE OR IF YOU’RE NOT MATURE ENOUGH TO WITNESS IT!!)

3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
And that’s assuming the so-called “massacre” is even real.

Jay Mathews, the first Beijing bureau chief for The Washington Post in 1979 and who returned in 1989 to help cover the Tiananmen demonstrations, wrote:

“Over the last decade, many American reporters and editors have accepted a mythical version of that warm, bloody night. They repeated it often before and during Clinton’s trip. On the day the president arrived in Beijing, a Baltimore Sun headline (June 27, page 1A) referred to “Tiananmen, where Chinese students died.” A USA Today article (June 26, page 7A) called Tiananmen the place “where pro-democracy demonstrators were gunned down.” The Wall Street Journal (June 26, page A10) described “the Tiananmen Square massacre” where armed troops ordered to clear demonstrators from the square killed “hundreds or more.” The New York Post (June 25, page 22) said the square was “the site of the student slaughter.””

“The problem is this: as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square.”

Source: https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php

Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside the square:

“Cables, obtained by WikiLeaks and released exclusively by The Daily Telegraph, partly confirm the Chinese government's account of the early hours of June 4, 1989, which has always insisted that soldiers did not massacre demonstrators inside Tiananmen Square.”

Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html (though admittedly this isn’t much use because of the paywall this article is locked behind)
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Gregory Clark, a former Australian diplomat, and Chinese-speaking correspondent of the International Business Times, wrote:

“The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time — among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.”

“Yet none of this has stopped the massacre from being revived constantly, and believed. All that has happened is that the location has been changed – from the Square itself to the streets leading to the Square.”

Thomas Hon Wing Polin, writing for CounterPunch, wrote:

“The most reliable estimate, from many sources, was that the tragedy took 200-300 lives. Few were students, many were rebellious workers, plus thugs with lethal weapons and hapless bystanders. Some calculations have up to half the dead being PLA soldiers trapped in their armored personnel carriers, buses and tanks as the vehicles were torched. Others were killed and brutally mutilated by protesters with various implements. No one died in Tiananmen Square; most deaths occurred on nearby Chang’an Avenue, many up to a kilometer or more away from the square.”

“More than once, government negotiators almost reached a truce with students in the square, only to be sabotaged by radical youth leaders seemingly bent on bloodshed. And the demands of the protesters focused on corruption, not democracy.”

“All these facts were known to the US and other governments shortly after the crackdown. Few if any were reported by Western mainstream media, even today.”

- Thomas Hon Wing Palin. (2017). Tiananmen: the Empire’s Big Lie

Source: https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/06/tiananmen-the-empires-big-lie/
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
And if all of that wasn’t enough for you, here is the BBC, CBS, and the New York Times FLAT OUT ADMITTING that the “massacre” wasn’t real.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8057762.stm

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/there-was-no-tiananmen-square-massacre/

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/27/world/clinton-in-china-the-site-clinton-in-beijing-square-may-tread-on-the-ghosts.html

And just to add the cherry on top, this video clip is Hou Dejian, who is a song writer from Taiwan and an organizer of the protest. He says that he did not see any killings in Tiananmen Square during June 4th.

https://youtu.be/eUcBm3qxeQ4

Also this video is one of the student leaders, Chai Ling, explaining how she tried to (but failed lol) to bait the Chinese government into actually committing a massacre.

https://youtu.be/Vu3zmbFGwQA

What makes this all the more shady is that following the false “massacre”, through Operation Yellowbird, many of the students (more like domestic terrorists imo) helped escape to the U.S. with the help of the CIA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Yellowbird

Almost all of them even gained privileged positions.

https://qz.com/1618805/the-1989-tiananmen-student-leaders-on-chinas-most-wanted-list
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I could spend all day putting more heaps of evidence here that the tiny man massacre was, in fact, not real, but I believe I’ve already made by case.

The conclusion that you can draw from this is that this is nothing more than a sinophobic lie manufactured to drum up hate against China, something we should actually be worried about, since we’ve seen so elegantly what the U.S. did to Iraq when spreading misinformation against it. If you want to mourn brave lives that were lost fighting for the betterment of their fellow men, then think back to parts of history that are actually real that the media likes to downplay or even pretend doesn’t exist, like the bombing of MOVE protestors, or the Stonewall riots, or any demonstrations carried out by the Black Panther Party. You are doing these people and more a great dishonor by upholding the Tiananmen Square terrorists instead.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Dang, didn’t know wanting basic human rights and the freedom not to be oppressed by a totalitarian communist government is terrorism.
Fred Leuchter and Grover Furr would love your company.
3 ups, 2y
Honestly I don’t even know why I bother at this point, you seem way too happy not having a brain.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
How many people did those tanks and guns kill before they finally stopped? Even if there were heightened emotions at the protests, were there no other ways the military and police could have mediated the situation?
The military and police were armed with sophisticated weapons and equipment, and drove big tanks, while the protestors had only iron bars and wooden sticks to protect themselves, or were even defenseless. Even if emotions were heightened, who would have been able to create more injury?

Other than the violent suppression and massacre, are we saying there was no other way to soothe tempers?
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
This is solid hard proof that liberals don’t know how to read. Just please look at what I have to say or don’t get involved in this debate in the first place.
2 ups, 2y
LOL, I’m a conservative, not a liberal. You must be pretty far-left if LIBERALS are too rightist for you.
1 up, 2y
https://live.staticflickr.com/13/17373996_515d18b492_w.jpg
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/resizer/q5eGtkqr2weCfw754R7nTae9UAA=/1200x0/filters:quality(80):format(jpeg)/arc-anglerfish-tgam-prod-tgam.s3.amazonaws.com/public/V7V7ES2BPJG6PAG2TRTX7TRRKI.JPG
https://i.redd.it/e2p8vv5ocsg51.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V_q9bVrqRyU/VW-nACev32I/AAAAAAAABts/qLQyDoC_g5Q/s320/19890604_fangZhengInjured.jpg
1 up, 2y
Can't believe it was that long ago.
Total day by day nerve wracker, hope turned into nightmare and we thought we may be verging on WWIII while students died only because they wanted to have a say in their own affairs.

Massacred in the name of 'rule by plebiscite' - the irony.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • tank man
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Today is the 34th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Never forget.