War is Over

who started it and why?

2014... 0bama...

so russia surrounding Ukraine for months before then invading and now destroying is on Obama? not seeing there guy, you sure you're not projecting and trying to make up blame

So you didn't know 0bama was behind the coup in 2014 to remove a legally elected president in Ukraine?

I can't, nor would I want to speak for AmericanViking, but I would toss it out there that Obama letting Putin walk right into Crimea and take it without so much as lifting a finger to stop him, was more than enough evidence for Putin to believe that Dementia Joe would do nothing if he moved on Ukraine. Obviously Dementia Joe has not fallen into line the way Obama did, so that's had to have come as quite a surprise to ol' Vladimir.

Nice try modda.

Your blind faith in sleazeballs like Bolton is most disappointing, yet most predictable.

Objectively, that's one person expressing his opinion, nothing more. So in other words, you come at people without facts. Opinions are not facts.

btw, are you feeling better today? Or are you just going to keep pounding an inane point over and over, in spite of being asked fairly simple questions with fairly simple examples provided to help you understand the questions?

There's no point in me clicking on your meme, modda. So I have no idea what it attempting to say. I would say what you're attempting to say, but that's just a bit too generous for someone who can't communicate in writing, so they post memes instead.

I prefer to have conversations with people who can express their own opinions, hopefully calmly and intelligently. You've, sadly, displayed no ability to do anything remotely close to that.

Well if you can see it fine as is, no need to click it for a larger view then?

I thought I made it clear that I couldn't see it well enough to read it, and was making an assumption about it based on the obvious photos of Bolton.

I would think you'd want me to click on it, since its reasonable to infer that you were attempting to communicate something about that hack Bolton by posting it.

So don't do it then?

Sorry, we've come to the end of the thread. Unlike other times, I won't keep posting replies to previous posts in the thread to keep it going.

Besides, this conversation would seem to have come to a natural conclusion anyway, since I don't think you're asking a serious question. Maybe you are, but "So don't do it then?" isn't communicating that to me.

So why are you still doing it still?

All these years - nay, decades - later and Obama still haunts Trumpers...

Obama doesn't haunt me at all. You just don't get me, do you? You can troll me all you want, but nothing anyone says to me or about me on imgflip makes me give a single fcuk.

I merely offered an objective view of what Obama didn't do, that is an entirely possible and reasonable explanation to help explain what Putin did do. The fact that you disagree, and can't discuss it in an intelligent, adult manner is of no concern to me.

I realize I'm hip deep into the 'don't argue with an idiot because the people watching can't tell you apart' concept, so chances are I'll bail on you shortly, modda, and start my holiday weekend. I'll be honoring those who served our country and made the ultimate sacrifice. How about you?

So why are you replying a defense to a comment about him that was to someone who wasn't you then? Guilty conscience much?

The sad grammatical issues in that question being set aside, I would answer (since you used a written form of language, instead of a meme this time, and I'm trying to respect that) by asking you, what did I say in any of these posts that makes you think I have a problem with someone chiming in and answering a post that wasn't a reply to one of their posts?

It was just a post that caught my eye and I felt I could respond to with a legitimate point that supports why I disagreed with what the person said. Nothing any deeper than that.

In fact, I started off by writing: "I can't, nor would I want to speak for AmericanViking, but I would toss it out there that..." That's about as fully neutral and explanatory as it gets. I can't really offer anything that would help you understand it any better.

Are you saying I've committed some kind of imgflip breach of conduct, to an unwritten protocol?

If you are, I call BS. If you're not, then I've misunderstood your poorly written question, and politely ask you to rephrase it in an understandable way.

Sure, ok....

But still, why reply?

I guess I'm just a cockeyed optimist, modda. I've had fairly adversarial relationships with some here on imglfip, that have turned around, possibly due to me treating them the way I'd like to be treated. On the opposite side of that coin, I'm not counting on that with you, though it would be preferable. I believe everyone has something to offer, even someone who (no offense) hasn't shown me much in the way of evidence to support me believing that about them. I'd like to believe that just because you haven't shown that, it doesn't mean it's not there.

Still going on?