1) the machines were not disabled.
2) the machines printed the votes correctly. What they did not print correctly was the tracking marks so the tabulator machines would recognize them as legit ballots.
3) the voter was given a choice of a different machine, traveling to a different location, or dropping off their printed ballots into a secure box to be hand counted.
4) once the printers were set to print darker, the tracking marks were picked up by the tabulator machines.
And, yes, I wonder what a full recount might bring as, for example, what happened in Pinal county where they had to re-count by hand and they found they'd under counted Mays votes by 120.
You are so desperate to explain away the losses you'll cling to anything rather than confront that fact that your candidates lost. They lost because of who they were and their platforms.
It's why you're stuck on "the machines were disabled!!!!!"
They weren't.
They were not printing within the tolerances of the tabulator machines for a few hours.
The problem was fixed.