Just the facts jack

Have you ever noticed how election results can have one candidate gaining a big early lead only to have it dwindle as more votes come in?
Is that 2% early or late votes?

I still think the computer code should be open to review, since that is what actually counts the votes. The staff feeding ballots into a machine is not the actual counting.
The AZ Supreme Court allowed Kari Lake’s challenge of non-matching signatures to go forward.

in Az. they had a mandatory machine recount for the AG race .Each side chose ballots batches from the control logs to use in the machine verification totaling 2% of the total vote for the state. Turns out that several of the 2% of the batches that were chosen were never counted to start even though the counter election supervisor swore they were and Mayes the Democrats lead start to evaporate rapidity. Rather than continue the recount beyond the 2% and search for additional missing ballots beyond those that were randomly chosen a judge ordered the recount closed and Mayes be declared the winner. She "won" by 225 votes out of 3 million cast.

Absolutely mind boggling.

No election results will ever be believed again.

Paper ballots. One day voting. Purple ink. In person only. ID required.

I could live with all that.

The criminals in charge will never let that happen but it is a nice dream.

Don’t wake me up! Lol