true tho

Sophomoric insults aside, perhaps you should educate yourself on the inconclusive effectiveness of masks. Or stay in your bubble. That's on you.

care to send me a news source to read?

Look it up for yourself.
Do you always get others to do your homework? This has been all over the news. All you have to do is look.
SMH

They also said vaccine compliance would have stopped the spread which is glaringly incorrect so, research may not be a strong suit.

how is it incorrect?

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/breakthrough-covid-cases-commonplace-experts-set-expectations-vaccine/story?id=85570454
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/breakthrough-covid-19-cases-deaths-rise-amid-push/story?id=85114757
https://time.com/6211659/long-covid-after-vaccination-booster/
Go ahead and do some cursory searches for breakthrough cases. These are only a few of a multitude of examples. The evidence is clear that "vaccinations" did not stop the spread. Referring to people who don't wholeheartedly trust experimental drugs as "dumbasses" is rather ironic given the preponderance of evidence. Skepticism and critical thinking have been lambasted by the mainstream media narrative:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-research.html
https://theconversation.com/vaccine-hesitancy-why-doing-your-own-research-doesnt-work-but-reason-alone-wont-change-minds-169814
and yet, those that chose to pass on the "vaccine" were no different in being able to pass the virus on to others.
The "vaccine", like the inconclusive masks, did little more than make people feel safe, and superior, to those that chose not to swallow every little thing the government told them to do. Labeling people as "dumbasses" to cover for the fact that despite being a good little follower of "the science", the virus persisted and flourished is reductive and silly.

whoever the moderator who took my comment down was, please show neutrality and take their's down too before you claim im "breaking terms of service."