Theories have still been debunked even after three years of first existing, heck even hundreds of years

Lol true

○The vast majority of "crazy right wing conspiracy theories" have been proven correct (in time.) Even the obviously false ones like the sandy hook scandal were based on easily provable fact. There are many videos of the "terrified" kids standing around talking and laughing before the liberal reporters showed up to tell em to cry for the camera to sell a narrative.
○But the actual important lesson here is that I was right about everything 2 years before the media admitted it, because I believed my OWN EYES over big government shills reading from a ○prepared script.
Triple masks: in 2021 if you weren't wearing triple masks you were killing grandma, in 2023 they admitted yeah, they're useless. The hundred years of mask studies indicating they don't stop microbes outweigh the 2 cherry picked "studies" saying they work.
○Chinese covid: in 2020 it was racist and treasonous to mention that covid came from a Chinese bio-weapons lab. Even tho it was common knowledge. In 2023 it's reported that yeah they government knew where it came from but couldn't say since they were on their knees for communist China.
○Biden family bribes: in 2019 Trump was impeached for trying to investigate brides paid to the Biden family from foriegn countries. In 2020 when Trump produced proof of these bribes, the shut it down claiming it was Russian propaganda. In 2021 we find out that not only are the bribes 100% (payments for no show jobs and "consulting fees") but the FBI had the original laptop the whole time and coulda brought it out at any time.
The point for you to take away from this: never believe your ears. Always believe your eyes. ○Every politician (even the ones you like...) are lying every word outta their mouth. If the media says something that's obviously fake, it means they're lying. It doesn't mean they know something you don't. Most of the time the phrase "right wing conspiracy theory" is just liberal media code for "we have no argument to refute this but have been informed that is doesn't support the agenda."
○Think for yourself. Learn. Research. Never trust authority. This includes me. Don't "believe," do your own independent research. And remember: the liberal "fact checkers" have been wrong about most things. This means faqchevck.dmc.chinesegvt.biv isn't independent research.

"○The vast majority of "crazy right wing conspiracy theories" have been proven correct (in time.) Even the obviously false ones like the sandy hook scandal were based on easily provable fact. There are many videos of the "terrified" kids standing around talking and laughing before the liberal reporters showed up to tell em to cry for the camera to sell a narrative."

Doubt that.

"○But the actual important lesson here is that I was right about everything 2 years before the media admitted it, because I believed my OWN EYES over big government shills reading from a ○prepared script."

Not necessarily.

"Triple masks: in 2021 if you weren't wearing triple masks you were killing grandma, in 2023 they admitted yeah, they're useless. The hundred years of mask studies indicating they don't stop microbes outweigh the 2 cherry picked "studies" saying they work."

They still say vaccines work and they will always work. Just get vaccinated every 6 to 12 months and you'll get protected.

"○Chinese covid: in 2020 it was racist and treasonous to mention that covid came from a Chinese bio-weapons lab. Even tho it was common knowledge. In 2023 it's reported that yeah they government knew where it came from but couldn't say since they were on their knees for communist China."

But it's not common knowledge. It was unproven at the time

"○Biden family bribes: in 2019 Trump was impeached for trying to investigate brides paid to the Biden family from foriegn countries. In 2020 when Trump produced proof of these bribes, the shut it down claiming it was Russian propaganda. In 2021 we find out that not only are the bribes 100% (payments for no show jobs and "consulting fees") but the FBI had the original laptop the whole time and coulda brought it out at any time."

Do you have proof that Donald Trump was impeached in 2019?

"The point for you to take away from this: never believe your ears. Always believe your eyes. ○Every politician (even the ones you like...) are lying every word outta their mouth. If the media says something that's obviously fake, it means they're lying. It doesn't mean they know something you don't. Most of the time the phrase "right wing conspiracy theory" is just liberal media code for "we have no argument to refute this but have been informed that is doesn't support the agenda.""

But believing your eyes can still mean getting things wrong.

"○Think for yourself. Learn. Research. Never trust authority. This includes me. Don't "believe," do your own independent research. And remember: the liberal "fact checkers" have been wrong about most things. This means faqchevck.dmc.chinesegvt.biv isn't independent research."

That fact checker you sent to me, I never even used it. There are still fake fact checkers out there and they're actually conservative who have become the very thing they swore to destroy

I'm only responding to one thing here: do I have proof that Trumpy was impeached in 2019 for trying to investigate Biden family bribes?
Of course. It's called the news.
It takes literally 9 seconds to find...
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump&ved=2ahUKEwjegbOEidP9AhVcMlkFHXPwCwkQFnoECBQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1CxU6Qvh7fnBtcIu_Qf3aR

Further research here...

https://www.npr.org/2020/02/05/801429948/not-guilty-trump-acquitted-on-2-articles-of-impeachment-as-historic-trial-closes

Impeachment is what the house did. Acquittal is what the Senate did. Impeachment doesn't move you for office in the USA. It is essentially a "grand jury" recommending the politician be removed.
Hence the confusion...

I thought Trump had two impeachments after the Jan 6 insurrection

Nope. One for trying to investigate Biden family bribes. One for taking 2 hours to condemn DC riots. Still waiting on Biden or Kamala to condemn 6 months of liberal riots...
Oh I forgot, leftwing anti trump riots "fight racism..."

The BLM protests. Not all of them were riots

Not all of the DC protesters were rioters. What about it?

"If it was an insurrection, lots of people woulda died. Learn history. Think for yourself."

More than 93% of the BLM protests have been peaceful, to which there was 7,750 Black Lives Matter demonstrations in all 50 states and Washington D.C. that took place in the wake of George Floyd’s death between May 26 and August 22.

That's no more than 543 protests that ended up riots, which may sound like more than the one from Jan 6 but trust me, there was way more than 7,000 peaceful protests in America during the BLM protest times.

https://time.com/5886348/report-peaceful-protests/

"More than 93% of BLM protests were peaceful... only 500 protests were riots..."
Your numbers are false because they are coming from the liberal media that defined looting as peaceful "reparations for black people" and throwing bricks at cops as peaceful because "no one was charged with a crime."
But let's take your numbers at face value: 500 Biden riots and 1 trump riot and you're still going on about January 6th?
Time to think for yourself and question the official narrative. Are we gonna have 500 impeachments since Biden never condemned BLM?

It's called the Jan 6 Riots/Insurrection for a reason

If it was an insurrection, lots of people woulda died. Learn history. Think for yourself.

"Your numbers are false because they are coming from the liberal media that defined looting as peaceful "reparations for black people" and throwing bricks at cops as peaceful because"

I don't think throwing bricks is that peaceful.

""no one was charged with a crime.""

USA today reported in a fact check that over 17,000 arrests had been made in the first two weeks of protests.

But I have no idea how many were charged, to which I guess liberal media don't want to report this, however Centre-Right media may report this, to which even Centre-Right media is still generally clean with facts.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/22/fact-check-thousands-black-lives-matter-protesters-arrested-2020/6816074001/

"But let's take your numbers at face value: 500 Biden riots and 1 trump riot and you're still going on about January 6th?"

I'm going on Jan 6 because it was based on a conspiracy theory and wasn't necessary. The BLM riots came because of the minority protesters weren't behaving.

"Time to think for yourself and question the official narrative."

What narrative?

Are we gonna have 500 impeachments since Biden never condemned BLM?"

No because Biden had nothing to do it.

What narrative?
The leftwing violence GOOD/ rightwing violence BAD narrative.
All riots are bad. The 1% caused by the right are no better or worse than the 99% caused by the left. Yet we don't hear two words outta the liberal media about how bad their hundreds of riots were...
Strange...

"What narrative?
The leftwing violence GOOD/ rightwing violence BAD narrative."

Both violence bad, but left wing violence doesn't occur as often. Name one time when left wingers were violent besides the BLM protests.

"All riots are bad."

Correct.

"The 1% caused by the right are no better or worse than the 99% caused by the left."

There's still a minority of the left being violent, and there are still a fair bit of fascists that were violent.

Back in 2018, there was a study determining that 24 Million Americans are a part of the alt-right. Compared to the 26% of Americans being Republican at the time.

That works out to be 84,968,000 Republicans back in 2018. Meaning over 1 in 4 Republicans were Far-Right. There may be less now, but there hasn't been a study since to determine how many alt-right members of the US.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/08/study-24-million-white-americans-have-alt-right-beliefs.html
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/

"Yet we don't hear two words outta the liberal media about how bad their hundreds of riots were...
Strange..."

Maybe centre-right media (not Fox News because the news section is Right Wing) may report the problems with the riots from BLM

The "study" claiming 24 million are "alt-right," defines alt right as right of Mao zedong. That study is meaningless as long as far left once world order shills like Obama are considered "moderate."
The important thing to understand is that there is basically no alt right violence. Democrats looting, screaming "F trump" & shooting each other isn't drug money isn't the alt right.
If there was an actual epidemic of right wing violence in the US, the left wouldn't have to defend their rioting as "mostly peaceful." They'd have more right wing shit to talk about instead.
So just as soon as we shut down communist terrorists organizations like antifa, we can start talking about that one right wing riot...

"Proof of what? A guided tour of Congress? There's no insurrection."

Not a tour guide, unlike Tucker Carlson's stupid pants on fire claim...

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/mar/08/tucker-carlson/evidence-rebuts-tucker-carlsons-claim-about-capito/

Watch the video. Who you gonna believe, your own eyes or the government shills?

Tucker Carlson's video is an edited video of the truth

Let's see the part of the video that supports your version. Oh wait.

"The "study" claiming 24 million are "alt-right," defines alt right as right of Mao zedong."

Do you have the quote from the site?

"That study is meaningless as long as far left once world order shills like Obama are considered "moderate.""

Like who would consider Obama a "moderate". I'm pretty sure he's more liberal than Obama but nothing like AOC or Bernie Sanders.

"The important thing to understand is that there is basically no alt right violence."

False.

"Democrats looting, screaming "F trump" & shooting each other isn't drug money isn't the alt right."

I know that, but are you saying its the left that stormed the capitol in Jan 6.

"If there was an actual epidemic of right wing violence in the US, the left wouldn't have to defend their rioting as "mostly peaceful." They'd have more right wing shit to talk about instead."

They did with Jan 6.

"So just as soon as we shut down communist terrorists organizations like antifa, we can start talking about that one right wing riot..."

Shutting down Antifa is not a priority but may still be considered only if they are extremely violent

I'm not saying the left stormed the capital. No one stormed the capital. Several different riots took place around the Capitol buildings that day including one from antifa posing as Trumpers and one from actual dumbass Trumpers. The antifa impersonators were immediately evident as they were throwing things at police and trying to burn stuff. That's the Far left's MO, not the far right.

The "storming of the capital" simply never happened. At the same time as the riots a bunch of stupid hillbillies got a guided tour of the capital building by capital police. Only after the fact, when the media needed a get outta jail free card for their 6 mouths of supporting liberal riots, did the tour with a friendly police escort become "the worst terrorist attack since 1812."

This is not to exonerate anyone who showed up that day. Anybody dumb enough to show up that day gets whatever they get. Everyone knew it was gonna be ugly. Hell, Trumpy himself offered to send the national guard to DC earlier that week simply to make sure shit didn't happen. Of course, the mayor of DC declined since she's vocally pro antifa, but the point remains nobody shoulda shown up.

But that's getting off track. I reiterate my original point: if people wanna cry about the 1% of right wing riots or 1% of right wing violence they have to start by pretending to care about the 99% of left wing violence.
If people wanna pretend like Trumpy taking several hours to condemn right wing violence is an impeachable offense? Well... we don't have one left wing politician who've ever condemned THEIR violence. You wanna pretend that's impeachable too?

"What about it?"

Proof that Jan 6 insurrection happened

Proof of what? A guided tour of Congress? There's no insurrection.

What about this?

What about it?

"Let's see the part of the video that supports your version. Oh wait."

The one which has no edited parts to which the edited parts would suit right wingers so they can be misinformed

Modern Republicans have bizarre moral standards

They dont believe that gay people should have rights but they do believe that a fetus with no brain of central nervous system should have rights.

Wtf is wrong with them.

I also believe that unborn babies should have rights, but so should gay people

Ok its good that your not one of those anti LGBTQ MAGAtrons

However in regards of abortion the problem id not the abortion itself but when its done. If its done early when the baby has no brain or nervous system then its fine.

By the way, do you remember when Hershel Walker had to pay for abortions despite being Pro-Life?

imgflip.com/i/73h5na

How about the FBI influencing Twitter and other social media? How about Hunter's laptop? How about virus misinformation? How about Snowden? How about Mar-a-Lago and the persecution of Trump? FBI investigating parents? We clearly cannot trust elements within our own government.

"How about the FBI influencing Twitter and other social media?"

The claim: The FBI paid Twitter $3.5 million to 'censor' information from the public
Verdict: False.

Sure the FBI may be watching Twitter but the FBI doesn't demand the Twitter accounts or content to be suspended or taken down.

Notifying Twitter of accounts that may violate the company’s terms of service is an action any user can take, not just the FBI.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/01/18/fact-check-fbi-gave-3-million-twitter-information-requests/11033845002/

"How about Hunter's laptop?"

What about it?

"How about virus misinformation?"

Yeah from Right Wingers misinforming people about COVID-19.

"How about Snowden?"

The claim: Edward Snowden exposed HAARP’s ‘global assassination agenda’
Verdict: False.

The article featured in the video comes from a satirical news website. Snowden has not released any kind of documentation of an assassination agenda associated with the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, also known as HAARP.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/03/01/fact-check-false-claim-snowden-revealed-haarp-assassination-agenda/11374339002/

"How about Mar-a-Lago and the persecution of Trump?"

This was because Trump mismanaged classified documents. Yes Biden did have a classified documents saga, but...

But while Mr. Trump tried to suggest a parallel, the circumstances of the Biden discovery as described appeared to be significantly different. Mr. Biden had neither been notified that he had official records nor been asked to return them, the White House said, and his team promptly revealed the discovery to the archives and returned them within a day.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/09/us/politics/biden-classified-documents.html

"FBI investigating parents?"

The claim: FBI's counterterrorism division adds threat tags to parents who protest school boards
Verdict: False.

The proof attached to Jordan's letter, which is an email exchange between FBI personnel, only has evidence the tags will be applied to investigate and assess threats directed against school officials, as other independent fact-checking organizations have noted.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/11/29/fact-check-fbi-not-using-tags-parents-protesting-school-boards/8739845002/

"We clearly cannot trust elements within our own government."

You just stated some suff that were proven false.

You're lucky this isn't politicsToo. But with this stream, you can actually debate, however there are some rules in place.