Since the left were for closing everything and requiring vaccine proof for everything during covid...

Just so you know, I'm being only facicous but even if such restrictions were in effect, closing certain businesses isn't the same thing as denying gays the right to go anywhere at all, gays would still be able go to other restaurants, movie theaters, entertainment venues, etc without having vaccine proof. Also straight people wouldn't be allowed to the gay bars either if they were closed. And if requiring proof of vaccination at gay bars violates federal discrimination law, think about the vaccine passport laws you advocated for violated federal discrimination law demanding vaccine proof for everything in everyday life, especially how such policies disproportionately affected unvaccinated black and indigenous people of color who are vaccine hesitant for their communities suffered the racist history of vaccine trials such as the Tuskegee experiment.

I get it, leftist logic: closing down everything to stop the spread of covid, perfectly fine. Closing down a certain type of business to stop the spread of monkeypox VIOLATION OF OUR RIGHTS!!!

Also, a gay bar is not a person, gays can still date at any other venue.

The WHO points out that monkeypox specifically is most spread among gay men who have sex with lots of strangers, not only gay men but disproportionately gay men. You think a certain group should be allowed to completely ignore public health guidelines just because you think they are "oppressed" and you don't wanna "hurt their feelings"? Yet your party shamed and demonized anyone who dared to even question covid restrictions. Very hypocritical of you to be concerned about one public health issue but not another that is more easy to control because you think it's "bigotry" and "oppression". I get it, you are all for equality, equal sharing of misery.

Also your analogy with black people and drinking fountains is a real false equivalency. There are no drinking fountains that are specifically for black people, those were gotten rid of decades ago. There are also no fountains that black people have a specific preference to because there is no point, it's just a fountain everyone can use. Also, even if gay bars and nightclubs were closed, gays can still have a dating life at any other venue people go on dates and it would not be all that different than their dating life at the gay bar. There are plenty of restaurants and bars that allow everyone regardless of gender or sexual orientation. It's not like every other bar is a "straights only" bar that gays would have difficulty getting into. How is closing certain bars while still letting gays go to other similar bars in anyway comparable to denying a black person a drink of water?

First of all, monkeypox outbreaks have been happening at gay bars and nightclubs and also at a gay leather kink festival in Belgium. Yes you are ignoring public health guidelines in the name of protecting a certain group you are way to soft for, and this certain group is disproportionately engaging in selfish irresponsible behavior that's causing a public health crisis (I also think straight people shouldn't f**k strangers and spread STDs). My apologies, l realize you don't want equal sharing of misery, you want special treatment for a group you think is "oppressed" even though they are treated equally. I understand the comparison you are making and you are making outright false equivalency between two thongs that are not comparable. This has nothing to do with discrimination, this is about temporarily shutting down places that have disease outbreaks. I suppose there is no constitutional basis for shutting down a specific type of business but that also means there is no constitutional basis for shutting down everything and making everyone completely stop living their life at all. Once again, shutting down places that have disease outbreaks is not the same thing as denying services to people just for being minorities. I do not want "unequal treatment" of anyone, you are strawmanning me. You are once again making false equivalencies, not letting ANYONE go to places with disease outbreaks is not the same thing as denying service to certain minorities everywhere else. Don't you realize the unequal treatment blacks had was actually being denied service for being a minority and being segregated. Not allowing gays (or anyone for that matter) at places that have disease outbreaks isn't the same as denying people service for being minorities. Both gays and straights can a dating life in the same places as each other where they aren't discriminated against or being segregated. You keep saying I want gays to be subjected to the same unfair treatment as blacks during Jim Crow but I want nothing of the sort. I do want gays to be free to have dating life including at the same places straights are, just not at places with disease outbreaks. How is that in anyway like some sort of unfair treatment or pro-discrimination law? Frankly you comparing your made up gay persecution complexes to the actual oppression of black people is a disgusting tactic exploiting another person's suffering to gain points for yourself in the oppression Olympics.