Absolutely not.

What the hell man, you only pointed out 300 out of how many?

Out of 693.

The sad part is, most "liberals" think mass shooting stats means a single person going psycho and shooting up a school, mall, concert, and so on, shooting whoever catches their eye.

But they also include occurrences like police shootouts, and criminals who go on running sprees, (robbing several stores in a row, even an hour apart) gang violence, etc. Hell, if you've got 4 people together in a circle, who each fire a single shot to their right, and all 4 are only grazed by a bullet (like a Jackass stunt or something) that's still a mass shooting.

I'm sure you know all this, I just had to get up on my soapbox for a minute. 😂

The changed the definition of a mass shooting, a few years back, I'm sure it had nothing to do with skewing the numbers...
But Yeah, maybe somebody somewhere, thier mind just opened up after reading, or just started searching for the truth.

Well, they use the umbrella term "mass shooting" and pretend it only means one thing instead of many. It's a common tactic, just like feminists with rape statistics. Roughly 90% of reported rapes don't result in any legal consequences for the accused, and they like to make you think all those uncharged rapes are male on female only, when a good number of them are any of the other 3 combinations, or even completely false allegations.

The fact all these nuts are out shooting people is the best argument for the 2nd amendment. Especially considering the government can’t keep you safe.