Don’t believe me? Google it.

What is a furry fandom?
A surprisingly very sexual fandom, despite what ignorant people inside the fandom itself might say. According to the Anthropomorphic Research Project, 96.3% of male furries reported watching furry pornography. 78.3 percent of females reported to watching furry pornography as well It was also reported that 50.9 percent of all art viewed by male furries was porn compared to the female 30.7%. Neither of those look like a small percentage of the fandom to me.

According to "State of the Fandom **2008**" by the Furry Research Center (furcenter.org), a portion of the fandom **(17%)** reported an interest in Zoophilia. This shows an increase in compared to a survey taken in **1997-1998** where it was only **2%** that were iterested in zoophilia. This is a visual example of an increase of a fetish in the community.

The 2015 "Rainfurrest" didn't make furries look good either. It was one of the biggest furry conventions, with 2,704 attendees. There was a count of assault, sexual assault, drugs, and multiple other uncivil actions reported. Internet Historian, a youtuber with over 2,000,000 (2 million), in a video covering the event, said in the description "The story of Rainfurrest 2015, one of the most degenerate conventions ever held. Drugs, petty vandalism and diapers -- it had it all. " The diapers he refferred to was "crinkling", which was a trend among furries and was very popular at the convention.
little fun fact, if you look up 'furry rapes their pet', there are almost 7 million results?

I might be on their side but to give credit where credit’s due, you cited your sources and explained everything perfectly

well here is some main facts and issues that you seem to be missing:
Almost all zoophiles happen to be furries due to anthropomorphic animals characteristic, any furry that is not a zoophile will gladly hate on a zoophile and disregard them, nobody likes zoophiles

next up the porn issue: One study found that 91.5% of men and 60.2% of women reported using porn in the past month.
that my friend is in ONE month, not lifetime and it is almost the same as furries
now lets also take the number of furries, its stated that around 1 million people are furries,
now if there are 1 million furries and abt 8 billion people the percent of bad furries to good furries will be different for example one bad person in a group of ten makes a 10% bad person rate, one bad person in a group of 20 makes a 5% bad person rate
if their are 8 thousand times more people than furries one bad person has a larger impact but that shouldnt be taken as a bad fandom

another huge issue is where you got your zoophilia information, in fine print on the bottom of the page it clearly states " Finding out how many zoophiles there are is a task well beyond yours truly and his team of researchers, crack though they be." (furcenter.org) now you see this means the results are highly inaccurate and it was a lower number of people counted, this info could have been taken from 1 furcon that most didnt attend due to the number of bad people making the numbers even more inaccurate

the ranfurrest 2015 story ah yes, now what is the issue?
take how many things like that have happened in the furry fandom and take how many mobs and murders and whatever that happen outside of the fandom. more bad things happen outside of the fandom than in and one case of a bad person doesnt mean a fandom is bad.

the "furry tapes their pet" result isnt very accurate you know? every result isnt a case if you were to search that up you would eventually find a link to this site, any page or site or anything saying words along those lines will popup 7 million results means that some people on reddit have said "furry rapes their pet" in an argument or something that number cant be trusted

READ THIS: Saying the furry fandom is bad due to some of its bad people is like saying weebs are all fat discord mods that are pedophiles. We can all agree that not all weebs are pedophiles and not all weebs are bad. so why are people judging furries on a few bad people? Same can be said for humans if you judged humans like you do (1/2)

First line
If your fandom really hated zoophiles and stuff, why don’t y’all just like make a movement to kick them out or something if ya really cared? Since that’s the main factor of why anti furries are anti furries.

Second line: ya saying that just one month is far above the rest or something? What happened? Were they the nnn champions or something and the survey was taken in December? Most likely not.
Even then bro if 91% of male furries or whatever were reported to watch yiff… even in a specific month or whatever, that is still a very high percentage of people watching that stuff.

And most percentage of bad things furries have done are compared as a ratio to the general population. For example in this case, the rates of zoophiles in a furry community is much higher than the overall population

The reason the zoophile article states " Finding out how many zoophiles there are is a task well beyond yours truly and his team of researchers, crack though they be.“ is because there could possibly be furries who are hiding the fact they are zoophiles, as well as the fact that they can’t research every nook and cranny of the internet.

Also what you said, “now you see this means the results are highly inaccurate and it was a lower number of people counted, this info could have been taken from 1 furcon that most didnt attend due to the number of bad people making the numbers even more inaccurate“
there is nowhere stating that the information is highly inaccurate and that it was taken in just one furcon.
If it was a research conducted by furries, why would they try to bump up the percent? To make their community look worse?

Additionally, if you look up a bunch of modern surveys on zoophile rates in furries, the least you’ll find is around 15% and the most is around 22%.

Next…
So you’re saying that a convention filled with sexual degeneracy, vandalism, people wearing diapers and drug abuse… isn’t to be blamed on by the furries in it, but the people outside of the fandom? WHEN ITS IN A CONVENTION MADE SPECIFICALLY FOR FURRIES???

Go to a comic con or movie con thing, you don’t see this stuff often in a convention.

Next, the furry rapes pet part, I agree with. I’ll have to search more about how many articles have it rather than searches on google.

Furries cant just make a movement to kick out zoophiles, how would that work? They would just show up and nothing can be done as they aren't breaking laws and cant be touched.

I said not 91% of male furries watched porn in a month im talking about non-furries,

As i stated before i do agree with there are more zoophiles in the furry fandom than not because furries look like animals so someone that is attracted to animals will obviously want to be a part.

The site doesnt say that because of some furries could be gatekeeping it says that because they can only ask a small number making results inaccurate (see my other response for more info)

I never said that the results were taking at 1 furcon i said they could be and there is a spot stating the info is inaccurate; the small text on the bottom i already talked about. And the research was made by furries as being neutral

This part is just dumb, if you find some sites saying 15% and some saying 22% that is a huge gap, meaning none can be trusted if they are all different.

im not saying it is to be blamed on the people on the outside, im saying yes furries did do that but look at humans, they do much worse and humans dont hate humans, you ask most furries and they will say they hate those bad types of furries. Just like how humans hate hitler.

comic con and movie cons arent furry things?? they are shared between fandoms therefore are irrelevant to facts just about furries

furries you would hate everybody and yourself, think about the Chicago mob, nukes, etc. all the bad horrid things humans have done but you dont look at a man walking down the street in disgust because he is a human and humans make nukes. its just a dumb way to judge a group

😨

o wow

do i need to cite my sources or properly format it?
becuase i shall if you need

Would you like to join the Anti furry society?

whoops guess i made a top tier rebuttal
There is no denying that pornography and sexual content exist within the furry community, as it does in many other communities and societies. However, it is important to note that not all members of the furry fandom are interested in or engage in this type of content, and to paint the entire fandom with a broad brush as being "surprisingly very sexual" is not accurate or fair.

It is also worth noting that the research cited in the original statement is outdated and may not accurately reflect the current state of the fandom. For example, the "State of the Fandom 2008" study is from over a decade ago and the "Rainfurrest" convention took place nearly a decade ago as well. It is not clear how representative these sources are of the current furry community.

It is true that any large gathering of people, including conventions, can potentially have incidents of inappropriate behavior, and it is important for organizers and attendees to work to prevent and address these issues. However, it is not fair to portray an entire community or fandom as being inherently problematic based on the actions of a small number of individuals.

In conclusion, while it is true that some members of the furry community may be interested in pornography or other sexual content, it is not accurate or fair to say that this represents the entire fandom. It is important to recognize that the furry community, like any other, is made up of individuals with a diverse range of interests and behaviors.

can u do that for lgbtq

Hold on gimme a few days

okay

Utter chad

Bro ur amazing. Here have a follow

when

I can only do one for non binary and trans stuff because I don’t got time to start a presidential debate over the homosexuality stuff

ok when

Idk

?

Hold on bro I’m absorbing as much information I can about this topic

ok

when

The transgender movement is one of the worst movements ever in the US history, and I will give points on why
1. It is a movement of mental illness. Studies have shown that many young people who are transgender also have some mental disorder, such as autism, severe ADHD, or bipolar disorders. This would also explain why suicide attempt rates for transgenders is up to 55% now, since mentally Ill people are more likely to commit suicide than non-Ill people.
“They only commit suicide because of being bullied though”
Then why does other groups who get bullied have lower suicide rates? Kids who get bullied almost daily in school have a lower suicide rate than transgenders. Black slaves had a lower suicide attempt rate than transgenders.
You can’t be telling me that being transgender causes more stress than enslavement, right?

2. Anything bad that a transgender does is always justified by the community. Whether they’re killing themselves, forcing non-consensual acts, or murdering people, they’re never in the wrong according to the community. (Look at the christian school shooting. The shooter was seen as innocent and the victims were seen as guilty because “the victims caused the shooter to kill others.” Who cares if they killed three kids and three adults who were 100% innocent? They still committed mass murder, which is among the worst crimes.)

3. They’re perverted; sexually, especially with forcing trans on kids. I’ve seen MANY protesters demand the mutilation of babies sexual organs because “they’re born trans”
LIKE HOW RETARDED DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO THINK THAT? ITS A BABY.
BABIES DONT GO “IM FEELING LIKE A DIFFERENT GENDER TODAY OR I WAS BORN IN THE WRONG GENDER, THEY SIT AROUND ALL DAY AND DO NOTHING BUT SUCK ON TOYS AND CRY. THEY DONT EVEN HAVE THE ABILITY TO THINK SUCH THINGS, BECAUSE THEIR BRAIN IS BARELY EVEN DEVELOPED YET.
Oh, and for the kids part, that’s just as messed up.
We have laws of consent for a reason. Most Children under 18 years don’t have the mental ability to have sexual relations and handle heavily explicit stuff because their brain is not fully developed yet; doing such things can cause permanent brain damage, especially those who aren’t teens yet.
But according to transgenders, “doing it to kids is okay.” Like bruh tf are you on? We have laws like this age of consent stuff for a reason, idk how literally causing irreparable and irreversible damage to a kids body is okay when they aren’t even aware of what could happen.

When I ain’t busy stealing memes or something

soon ?