“The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.” - Thomas Paine

GG everyone

All i ask is that you try your best to keep the rest of your guys in line lol

No, Fak's the leader because he's the president. Thanks for admitting that you're the shadow president. The leader of the party needs to be at the highest rank of the parliament besides Supreme Court

No, you said you're the party leader so you're the shadow president

he doesn't have to be a party leader to try to find some peace

No, Scar is not desperate, you chose to get mail-in voters because you knew you didn't get much support with the regulars and now you're getting the Reel_Polytix9 SJWs to colonise this stream. Thanks a lot

But not enough obviously, one meme is not enough. Being active for most days is what we need. You obviously want a one party thing like what China already have, as well as Afghanistan, and Russia is likely heading to that stage because the communist party is dead there with Putin poisoning the opposition leader (frequently because he doesn't like democracy)

Give me some websites that say that? But don't send me sites like Infowars, Fox News, Russian Websites, etc.

Ok, I get it. Even Slobama agreed with you this one time, but I haven't really heard about Zelenskyy banning Russophile parties, because every other country would. Putin would ban Pro-Western parties, yet you don't seem to care

"Big difference between a political party dropping a candidate and a government banning a political party."

Still, something happened in Australia, plus Australia, UK, and the US weren't even a part of the Soviet Union. Ukraine was a part of the Soviet Union, which there would be much more russophiles who would have been in Ukraine than Australia, UK, and the US.

I don't think the Democrats have gotten around to banning the Republicans just yet

Actually, there was a Russophile candidate who got disendorsed when trying to run for the seat of Macnamara who was with the United Australia Party (a right wing party created by Clive Palmer) according to both The Guardian and The Australian (which I don't have a subscription to, and is owned by News Corp, which was created by Rupert Murdoch)...

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/mar/02/australias-anti-vaccine-groups-switch-focus-to-putin-praise-and-ukraine-conspiracies

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/24/russia.lukeharding

Yes, traitors got banned from participating in a government that they’re doing everything to dismantle.

The only thing surprising to me is how long this took. Pro-Russian Parties should have been banned within minutes of the first missile strike.

Yes, World Socialist Website are hard core left, too much to the left in fact. I'd even use neoconservative news sources too, as long as I get the facts.

I use whatever site I can as long it is reliable (meaning minimal bias, but can be still centre-left or centre-right, don't bother with opinion, and check if their research has been well done)

https://www.rferl.org/amp/ukraine-law-bans-pro-russia-parties-zelenskiy-signs/31849737.html

He’s talking about this. It’s true, and in peacetime this would be a dictator move, but as usual, BritishMormon omits the context that…

UKRAINE IS BEING ACTIVELY INVADED BY RUSSIA.

Lol. There is no place within a government for a party that is actively conspiring and warring against it. That is the plain definition of treason.

Don’t like a sovereign and independent Ukraine, there’s plenty of space for you right across the border.

https://youtu.be/Ag1o3koTLWM

A YouTube link. Lol.

Out with it now. Are you calling Democrats traitors?

Oh, yeah. But that's happened in every country, like Australia banned the communist party in the 1950s. But why complain about banning a Pro-Russia party? I thought BritishMormon was talking about regular major parties that were banned and he said it was "much more efficient" meaning worse.

https://www.labourhistory.org.au/hummer/the-hummer-vol-10-no-1-2015/australia-failed/