Or you could take a wildly successful company made up of subject matter experts and convince them they are failures.

Then, Larry, I suggest you buy Musk out and run the company into the ground on your own dime.
BTW, what do all those employees produce that would warrant all those "perks" that they all took for granted?

It is obvious that Musk had no intent to run this company in the long term. His "Simon Legree" tactics can only be explained as an attempt to "hollow out," a cadre of expert employees who might resist the direction he wanted the company to go. I suggest you read Robert Townsend's "Up the Organization." What he taught about management is as relevant today as it was about a half a century ago, when he took Avis from a little regarded subsidiary to the "We Try Harder," equal to the behemoth Hertz. People make "Service Sector," companies "fly or flop." The middle of a skilled worker shortage is a bad time to go Neanderthal.

Or, an attempt to expose the collusion between Twitter (and other like companies) and the Democrat Party.

There is no "Democrat Party. The official trademarked name is the "Democratic Party." The immaturity of calling it something else, is noted. It is like calling "Twitter," "Twit." Your "attempt to expose collusion," accusation is made with no supporting facts, out of left field. Twitter was and is a private company. Its previous owner leaned left, its current owner leans right. Those are their choices. I choose not to use their platform.

Whatever

Did you not see the document dumps that have been occurring for the past couple of weeks detailing the collusion?

I hope you will excuse me if I don't blindly believe everything you get from the Extreme Right-Wing Echo Chamber. After months of his employer, Fox News, hyping the "Stolen Election BS," Sean Hannity (one of the chief hypers) testified under oath "I did not believe it for one second."

As a former Federal employee and a custodian of records, I know that the government charges some people for the cost of supplying information under the Freedom of Information Act. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies pay Twitter and other sources for the cost of supplying information needed to conduct investigations. This normal quid pro quo is what your buddies call collusion. Sorry. But the truth does not support the wild allegations you are trying to sell.

note: I copied and deleted and repasted these paragraphs in order to correct a typo.

blah blah blah

Blah blah blahblah

note: I didn't

As always, don't let facts get in the way of your story!

More blah blah?

As a follow up to the believability of Right-Wing media, contrast this from December 18, 2020, edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Sean Hannity Show, with his sword testimony this week:

EAN HANNITY (HOST): "There's no doubt this was stolen. No doubt whatsoever. I don't have any doubt in my mind."

One of his statements has to be a lie. And you believe this stuff?

"sworn," not "sword." My proofing skills suck!