The truth about covid and the vaccines is coming out now...

Lack of evidence, doctors baffled...

Insurance company death payouts don't lie... OOPS

During a pandemic? Now I'M baffled...

Nope... after the vaccine rollout...

............ which was during a pandemic...

Yes... The timelines are tough... got it...

Are you under the impression that the pandemic ended entirely just before the vaccine was rolled out?

Just Released Data from Health Insurance Shows 4 Times Increase in Sudden Deaths AFTER COVID Vaccine Rollouts

Remember: Pfizer fought to keep trial data hidden for SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS!

I understand it’s more dollars than that if the patient goes on ventilator. A lot more.

The CDC issued a treatment protocol hospitals had to adhere to in order to receive the compensation for covid patients.

The more you know:
https://www.brightworkresearch.com/how-the-us-covid-treatment-protocol-maximized-hospital-admissions-and-deaths/

Eh... Almost right off the bat your source seems like it's trying to mislead people..

"Remdesivir trials during the 2018 west African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because the death rate exceeded 50% yet Fauci recommended it for Covid despite having similar adverse effects"...- Mercola

1. Kind of makes it sound like the Remdesivir killed them.... not oh idk... the EBOLA.

2. According to BMJ.com more than 75% of the people who caught Ebola and received no drug treatments died. Outside of that source, I have seen ranges of 40%-90% case fatality rate for Ebola. So in context, the 53% death rate they're talking about of people with Ebola on Remdesivir doesn't seem bad at all... It's actually an improvement.

3. The Remdesivir part of those trials was shut down. True..... But it was not shut down for being deadly. It was shut down for being far less effective than two of the other drugs they were testing for Ebola treatment. The other two drugs were able to get the death rate down to roughly ~30% (and even lower in some situations) vs the 53% for Remdesivir.

So ya idk maybe the rest of that article is legit (?) idk... but when the intro seems to already be misleading the viewer.... it makes me want to not bother finding out.

Right off the bat (pun intended!) Fauci was misleading people by discounting human-to-human transmission and aerosol transmission of SARS CoV-2 when it had been established years earlier SARS was transmitted human-to-to via aerosols.
Fauci discouraged/prevented off-label use of HCQ but promoted off-label use of other drugs in hospital for covid.

So I place no confidence in Fauci/NIH/CDC.

Very punny.
:P

Similar to ivermectin, HCQ has been widely shown to not be effective against Covid so I'm not exactly surprised he discouraged it's off label usage.

Fauci, the WHO, and many other doctors in the medical establishment thought it was not airborne at first. Maybe they were just trying to prevent a panic , maybe the viewpoint was not as "established" as you think.... I don't know. In any case if we had treated it as an airborne virus in the beginning, I imagine the lockdowns etc would have been that much more severe.

He/they were clearly wrong on that but to his credit Fauci eventually changed his tune as more data came in. I somehow doubt the same will be true for that article.

There are more studies showing effectiveness of HCQ and Ivermectin than not. At least one highly touted study against HCQ was proven highly flawed and retracted.

Recent studies show Ivermectin is effective.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357864226_Ivermectin_Prophylaxis_Used_for_COVID-19_A_Citywide_Prospective_Observational_Study_of_223128_Subjects_Using_Propensity_Score_Matching

They should have erred in side of caution and assumed it was aerosol transmission. Instead five states were allowed to mandate infected patients were to be placed back into nursing homes.

Studies in 2005 showed HCQ effective against SARS. When I got covid, I took HCQ, ivermectin, zinc, antibiotic, Vit D. Worked for me. Thousand of doctors, scientists and medical personnel signed onto the Great Barrington Declaration advocating early treatment.

Let me remind you Fauci stated doing gain of function is worth the risk of a pandemic. He got his pandemic, but he has not said what was learned that was worth +5,000,000 dead worldwide.

Remdesivir was pulled from the Ebla study because it was causing kidney failure. Not exactly a safe drug.

By the end of 2020, the United States, with 4.5% of the world’s population, had 25% of the COVID-19 deaths, 95% of which occurred in U.S. hospitals with Remdesivir protocols that had been proven in the manufacturer’s own study to destroy the kidneys and or livers of 31% of its users (for a disease with a 1% fatality rate globally

Considering Ebola itself causes kidney failure... I mean... idk.. might be an iffy claim...

Covid also can cause kidney failure.

What % of people with covid went to hospitals with those protocols? If 95% of the people with Covid went to hospitals using Remdesivir protocols, than you would expect 95% of the Covid deaths to be in hospitals using Remdesivir protocols. I would tend to assume that protocol was somewhat widely used (or used in the largest cities) but maybe not.

Ebola study used four drugs. Remdesivir was pulled from the study because it was causing kidney damage. Patients receiving the other drugs were not having kidney problems to the extent patients on Remdesivir experienced.
Remember that part of the Hippocratic oath: First do no harm?

The main reasons to not take the vax:
1) it does NOT stop you from spreading COVID
2) it does NOT stop you from getting COVID (there is good evidence you are MORE likely to get it if you took the vax)
3) it does NOT lessen symptoms or hospitalizations
4) the latest mutations of COVID are very mild
5) there is a 96% chance you have already been exposed to COVID so you already have the anti-bodies for COVID
6) it makes no sense to take a medicine with ANY CHANCE of a serious side effect when your immune system will not only defeat the virus, and it will be made stronger in the process.