Imgflip Logo Icon

Hypnotic video game Psyops training simulators may contribute

Hypnotic video game Psyops training simulators may contribute | "MS. SAMPSON, HAS THERE BEEN ANY STUDIES THAT CORRELATE HOW THE MARKETING TACTICS USED BY THE {GUN MANUFACTURERS} ARE RELATED TO 'GUN VIOLENCE' AMONG KIDS AND ADOLESCENTS?" -DEBBIE DOWNER WASSERMAN-SCHULZ, 7/27/22 CSPAN; MS. SAMPSONS' REPLY: "YES. & THEY'RE IN MY WRITTEN TESTIMONY."; "...BUT BASICALLY, IT HAS TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT YOUNG PEOPLE ARE SUSCEPTIBLE, ESPECIALLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO MESSAGES FROM ADVERTISERS. AND SO WHEN YOU TELL CHILDREN,... THAT THESE GUNS WILL GIVE THEM MORE ADRENALINE,"; "...or you use FIRST PERSON SHOOTER games to promote FireArms; "...THINGS OF THAT NATURE, IT DRAWS IN YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE MORE VULNERABLE, AND MAYBE NOT ABLE TO SORT OUT REALITY FROM FICTION." | image tagged in cultural marxism,the constitution,biden obama,maga,mass shooting,military psyops | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
10 Comments
merryprankster
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
But, you want kids to decide at 5 whether or not they are male or female and change their genitalia accordingly.
UrbanDwellersAlmanac
0 ups, 2y
Maybe you do. What causes you to be fixated that way?
UrbanDwellersAlmanac
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
To Verify: Is the "you" that you refer to Florida Congresswoman Shulz, or Ms. Sampson of the Brady Group? They are the only people directly quoted in the meme.
RunawayTrain
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Twisted logic.

Ms. Sampson’s use of the word “you” is improper English. The reply by Sampson to DW-S should have used “one” referring to a third party, instead of “you” referring to the person being addressed.

merryprankster is referring to the collective left, including your anti-second amendment self, as “you”.
merryprankster
2 ups, 2y
EXACTLY!!!
UrbanDwellersAlmanac
0 ups, 2y
The UrbanDwellers Almanac is certainly pro US Constitution as ratified in 1789.
Where do you go off claiming otherwise? Your Brilliance is astounding, and proceeds you in your farcical and highly humorous and entertaining accusations. Bahahahahahahaha!!!
merryprankster
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Neither. I was referring to the one what posted the meme and the side they represent
UrbanDwellersAlmanac
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
It is both your logic that is not only twisted, yet lacking.
Could it be that the train has runaway in a merry prank? You two are reading a lot into what is not there, and extending it for what, one could only guess? Enjoy your fools paradise, for unfortunately, neither of you are on the correct page.

To be clear: 400 million LEGAL firearms exist in the USA, and are owned as legal property by your safe neighbors, by Ms. Sampsons' safe neighbors, and by Debbie Downer the Congresswomans' safe neighbors, all across the fruited plain. As legal property, those weapons are protected by the first, fourth, and fifth amendments. The 2A is important, yet only as a last legal resort in the protection of this property. If that is anti-any amendment, then both of you are sadly mistaken.

The meme is merely pointing out Ms. Sampsons' assessment on the congressional record, that the ROOT CAUSE of the misuse and abuse of firearms in the criminal act of carrying out Mass Shootings whether it be on the Vegas Strip, or at schools, is the fervent obsession and training via FIRST PERSON SHOOTER Games. It is not the marketing by gun manufacturers. It is not the ready availability. Michael Moore may wish to defer it to bowling, yet not all subsequent perpetrators went bowling. ALL, however, shared gaming in common.

It is allegedly the precision training, and development of the Desire to perform and re-enact their practiced immersion in the game, of young nut job adolescent males turning fantasy into grotesque reality. They could be 1 in 1,000 that play the game whom can't handle it. Even that is too much.

Our Legislators would be better off writing Legislation to abolish, control, restrict, and eliminate FIRST PERSON SHOOTER GAMES, as they aren't protected by a constitutional amendment explicitly, than attempting to infringe on private property that is a personal possession.

These games being a danger to society, ought nullify the continued attempts to protect them under the first amendment. One could make the assertion that these games very existence is a "hate crime", for they train children in the simulation and practice of how to carry out the crime of murder.
merryprankster
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
tl;dr
UrbanDwellersAlmanac
0 ups, 2y
*Might help to become Literate first.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 2
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz
  • Call of duty
  • adam lanza the gamer
    • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    "MS. SAMPSON, HAS THERE BEEN ANY STUDIES THAT CORRELATE HOW THE MARKETING TACTICS USED BY THE {GUN MANUFACTURERS} ARE RELATED TO 'GUN VIOLENCE' AMONG KIDS AND ADOLESCENTS?" -DEBBIE DOWNER WASSERMAN-SCHULZ, 7/27/22 CSPAN; MS. SAMPSONS' REPLY: "YES. & THEY'RE IN MY WRITTEN TESTIMONY."; "...BUT BASICALLY, IT HAS TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT YOUNG PEOPLE ARE SUSCEPTIBLE, ESPECIALLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO MESSAGES FROM ADVERTISERS. AND SO WHEN YOU TELL CHILDREN,... THAT THESE GUNS WILL GIVE THEM MORE ADRENALINE,"; "...or you use FIRST PERSON SHOOTER games to promote FireArms; "...THINGS OF THAT NATURE, IT DRAWS IN YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE MORE VULNERABLE, AND MAYBE NOT ABLE TO SORT OUT REALITY FROM FICTION."