If elections using Dominion Voting Systems raise questions, stop asking questions. Problem solved.

Muh Fraud.

70r196.jpg (click to show) Ha ha- good 1

Yup thinking is hard, that's why we have democrats-so no one has to think.

Can't speak for you but thinking comes pretty easy to me.... Seems actually harder to not think than to think.

Awww, such a sweet backhanded and arrogant insult. I'm glad you have such an inflated sense of superiority.

Not gonna lie... Wasn't sure how to respond to the previous comment about thinking. I don't feel like I'm better than you. I almost went into a rant about meditation but that isn't exactly attempting to not think and that's kind of getting out into the weeds... Idk.

If you have a better photo or source link for the graph maybe we could go back to the topic at hand. It's kind of hard to read and the bottom is completely obscured. Looks like it's on a scale of 200,000 votes though...pretty high. Also if the vote in the counties following that first one are more or less 50/50 dems/repubs, both sides of the vote totals were added at more or less the same time, and with the scale of votes as high as it was on the graph, I think that could explain it appearing that way. I'm open to viewing more information about it though.

I do not question your intelligence for a second. In fact share a bit of your gift for sarcasm. This was a screenshot of a live video feed by a service called Edison Research https://www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling-2/ It's a paid service, there may be a backdoor in to their data, but I'm not aware of it.
You are correct the scale was 200,000 votes, they adjust for population, so smaller states like Wyoming view differently, but most other states fit in that range. Bottom line covered up by text is the hour, broken into 6 minute increments. The large spike at the bottom left of the screen is when counting started and is expected at the first input of the count data.
I don't want to come across as insulting your intelligence, but see how in each increase in votes, there is a corresponding increase in each party and the differential between R and D stays in a pretty tight range, too precise to reflect the various precincts in Minnesota. This precise trend continued through the whole counting process, there was no true variation. It's the pattern that draws attention. That pattern is not repeated in any other state that either made election integrity corrections or had good practices in place. The states that had similar patterns in 2022 had election issues in 2020, no legislation was passed to improve or assure election integrity and the results are the same, the Democrat always won. The same adjustment being made every 6 minutes is suspicious.
I have no delusions of influencing you. There are numerous videos of ballot submission assistance programs- (they don't call it ballot harvesting anymore) where car after car dumps dozens of ballots into drop boxes. In 2020 there were around 240,000 more votes counted than ballots in Pennsylvania, and the same thing happened in other states, not as pronounced.
Do I think R's a squeaky clean? No. But this is so evil and obvious that it infuriates me. Our government is corrupt at the highest levels, and the corrupt control the process. We are no longer self governing, we are under the rule of tyrants. I'll lose any debate fair and square, but I detest cheaters claiming victory under pure lies.

I mean I get it. The graphs kinda look like a pattern of parallel steps. And I'm not necessarily saying that it isn't some type of fraud. What I am definitely saying is it seems like any time something looks odd on the surface (particularly when a Democrat won) the conclusion here always automatically drawn is that it was fraud. (Or often anyway)

I don't have screenshots from other states to compare, I don't know how the laws in other states compare, I don't know how the data was entered into the system from the ballots nor how that data was transposed/ entered into the graphs... I understand you seem to be claiming an algorithm entered fake data every 6 minutes but I'm just not really sure I know exactly what I'm looking at here.

Some of the flatter areas of the steps have 2 dots in between each increase, some have 3... And 2 of the increases/rises are clearly not the same amount of increase. One of them more or less in the middle looks like it differs from the other by about ~50,000 votes. Is each dot 6 minutes or each line 6 minutes? Idk. In any case they are not completely parallel. If the scale was smaller the differences would be more pronounced.

I visited the website you said it was screenshot from but you're saying it was live video feed so that would explain why I can't seem to find stuff about it there.

Yeah to get that info from Edison costs big bucks, we both have better ways to spend our allowance. I was tied in through a friend with a temporary link on election night after she noticed irregularities in a number of races in several states. The lines are 6 minute increments, the dots are the publically released submission of vote tallies as they came in to the state Secretaries of State offices (or other public entity that recorded ballot totals).
In some states the algorithm was much smoother than this example. The Republican contended never got within more than a certain range, no mattter whether votes were coming in from heavily Republican or heavily Democrat precincts. (I know a lot of places don't call them precincts, they're wards or what have you). I saw an overlay of similar charts from past elections and this pattern is totally uncharacteristic in every example I was shown, typically R would edge ahead, then D would take the lead, etc until the final vote count. This is only in areas where the voters for a congressional, senate or statewide race were not monlithic and races had a history of being close (close being a relative term). Colorado for example is almost exclusively Republican everywhere in the state except for a few ski area/resort based counties and the urbanized Front Range. More odd stuff there, but I'm so sick of this stuff I stopped the deep dive and just skimmed it.
My training is to look for patterns and anomalies then to recommend or implement appropriate adjustments, gross or incremental, project the outcome and monitor for desired or deviated results. Beyond this would be a bunch of esoteric bullshit and rambling sentences to explain, but you understand.

Just for fun, do a google search for deep sea fishing equipment, or alpine ski equipment- something you would never even consider and have never searched before, then watch the algorithms at work in your daily tech usage. If you want to go one step further just talk about some off the wall product or vacation, again, nothing you have ever discussed before- like a trip to Tahiti- with your smartphone sitting on the table in front of you. Big Brother is not only watching you, he's manipulating you.

I'm well aware of algorithms at work with Google listening in and trying to sell and recommend me sh*t, etc....TikTok's collection of data is completely wild but Google is no saint either. You could make the defense that at least Google is based in America but eh..

On the other hand...... the Google/YouTube algorithm has sent me music that I reallllllly enjoy based on other stuff I've watched & listened to. Is that manipulation? Or are they just catering to what I like? Both?

Also... if Google or whatever company is manipulating me into being skeptical of what those screenshots of election charts mean, is it not possible they're also conversely manipulating you?

Keep in mind Google worked with the Chinese government to develop their social score system. In China you are required to have your cellphone on you at all times. It controls where you can travel, where and what you can buy, tracks every move, grants you access or denies you access to your accounts, determines if you can get medical care, tracks who you associate with, what you say, if you criticise the govt.- literally every aspect of life and puts it into a national database. No Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin or Mao to put an evil face to this- it's all artifical intelligence and algorithms. Rage Against the Machine, and it shuts you down. Last I saw they have about 300 million cameras using facial recognition developed by Google to track civilian movement. Little known fact- there are websites that monitor cellphone use worldwide for data on where additional cell phone capacity will be needed. Per capita, China has the highest use of cellphones, all because of the ESG score controls. When the "official line" at the beginning of COVID was released from China, they reported 3000 deaths as they implemented shutdowns. Tracking showed that over 3 million cellphones had disapperared (for lack of a better word) from the system over a 10 day period, primarily in the Wuhan region. Also little reported, Wuhan was an area where the ChiComs had centralized hazardous waste incinerators for the nation. Civilians were heavily protesting the lack of environmental/health protections and the increase of health issues and the ChiComs silenced the protests releasing the virus and literally welding the apartment doors shut on those engaged in dissent where they starved to death or jumped from apartment windows to their deaths.
Service or manipulation? Again, what I say has no impact, you have to do the digging that will inform you.
Regarding election fraud, look at what regions in Arizona had the voting machine malfunctions. All were in Republican strongholds, not one malfunction in Democrat precincts. Do a little digging on the ballots that were known not to have been counted that were "accidently" mingled with counted ballots instead of being placed in a bin to be counted again for accuracy.
Isn't it logical that if there was voter fraud to suppress a "red wave", the Democrat would win?