'Free & Fair Elections'; NOT 'The End Justifies The Means'

Proper voter ID laws like the rest of the world would also do that too...

:0)

"... so that they intimidate minorities from voting." You didn't write "police", and you depicted an airsoft cosplay chick with a push up bra... So I felt like completing your thought for clarity.

A R E A L S T R E T C H to mention minority intimidation! What are you, the thought whisperer making it up as you go?

The girl is not wearing a push up bra, Charles. If anything, a bullet-proof vest would do her a lot more good in the situation depicted...

Correct caption but you used the wrong pic. Should be Joe Biden (or Hillary Clinton, or Stacey Abrams, etc...).

It's okay, though. Rookie mistake. ;)

Stacey Abrahms, yes. Absolutely. But I think YOU were thinking about Kari Lake, Not Hillary. Understandable mistake.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA

That's a corrupted jury. Hillary's probably been doing some jury tampering.

It's really hard to find favorable jurors for a known criminal. That's why you charge in advance...

Yeah, I don't know if you'd know this, but if a jury has made up its mind before a trial has even begun, then that's a corrupted, and thus illegitimate, jury.

Nice try though.

Well, this is Trump's org. own legal team, and they moved forward with the current jury selection. They're all sworn to be impartial. So the trial is ON.

You didn't know ? What rock have you been living under ? That's what you get for strictly watching hyper biased OAN, Newsmax or Breitbart and letting them feed you constant garbage. You gotta watch AP news or something party-agnostic.

"They're all sworn to be impartial."

But if your meme is any reflection of reality, are they?

"watching hyper biased OAN, Newsmax or Breitbart and letting them feed you constant garbage. You gotta watch AP news or something party-agnostic."

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Actually, I don't watch any of those. But, again, nice try.

Of course they won't be impartial ... LMAO. And theres nothing anyone can do about it.

So you agree with me then?

Glad you finally saw reason, even if it was begrudgingly ;)

Anyone would have to be pretty stupid to believe impartiality from the jury that tried Bernie Madoff. Same case here. Open and shut case, so, same result.

And actually there is, as being "tried" under a partisan jury is a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Who said partisan ? The only possible partisan point of view would be someone who believed Trump innocent. There's plenty of honest republicans who know Trump's a habitual criminal.

Apparently you haven't done what I said.

Please, go do it.

It's your lawyers job to make sure jury selection is fair. I checked Darrel Brooks. Darrel got himself the stupidest of lawyers. And his jury wasn't really impartial. But you gotta trust the juror's word. You know how that ended up, right? It was an open and shut case anyhow.

Because of his habit of not paying his bills, your friend 45 is scratching the bottom of the lawyer barrel. Headed the same way.

t... t-t-t...t... TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUMP!!!!!

I'd rather be the snowflake instead of a cultist. Still looking at my watch and having my popcorn.

Bernie Madoff? Since when were we talking about Bernie Madoff? And no, it is NOT the "same case here."

Money Laundering, Wire Fraud, Ponzi Scheming, Perjury, False Filing... to me it sounds like pretty similar criminal activity from both, Madoff and Trump

Go read the Sixth Amendment.

Once you have done that, go yell at the sky or whatever you do to get all your emotions out.

Then read the Sixth Amendment again.

Care to make a bet about the outcome ?