Imgflip Logo Icon

Christians hate science

Christians hate science | Did you know, Christians were so terrified of the teaching of evolutionary biology that they criminalized it in many southern states, this culminated in the infamous Scopes trial. FUN FACTS WITH RICHARD DAWKINS | image tagged in richard dawkins,evolution,charles darwin,atheism,christianity,science | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Richard dawkins memeCaption this Meme
19 Comments
3 ups, 2y
A lot of folks don't know the full title to Darwin's famous book.

It's "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life"

Wonder if they'd cancel him today for favoring one race over another???
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
False... They didn't want unproven, unscience (then and now) evolutionary THEORY taught in schools. In the end, it was supposed to be taught in parallel with the historical creation account, but then the leftist "separation of church and state" nazis got rid of creation and only allowed the false religion of evolution to be taught.

Those right thinking communities understood that equating man with animals falsely would undermine their intrinsic value as created beings. And they've been proving right by the raving lunatics we have in society today like BLM, Antifa, the Squad, etc...
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Evolution is both proven science and theory. But congratulations on being the 1,000,000th descendant of Adam and Adam's rib.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
And congratulations to you as well. Perhaps give thanks to God who created you?

Evolution is not science nor proven. Even evolutionists admit that. It’s solely a theory trying to explain all the actual evidence we have. That same evidence is explained (correctly mind you) by the creation account and never contradicts it. Evolutionary myth has to change all the time as new evidence confounds its fantasy.

Sorry you’re triggered by truth.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
You’re simply delusional. There is no scientific evidence pointing to creation, or should I say, specifically the Christian God. Evolution is proven science, as Darwin noted every species descends from a common ancestor and natural selection is how we came to be the form we, and how everything else appears today. Darwin came to this conclusion from artifacts such as skulls, bones and fossils.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Darwin THEORIZED this... it was his best guess given the evidence and deliberately excluding a Creator God from the mix. That's all evolution is. It's not science and you cannot prove it is... I can prove it is not. It's never been observed (changes from one kind to another) and never been repeated. These are two benchmarks for SCIENCE.

I never said the scientific evidence points to Creation. I said correctly that all the evidence we have, rocks, trees, biology, astronomy etc. does not contradict Creation at all. The stuff you imagine is again theories to explain the evidence that leave out God so they come up with something even more fanciful (something from nothing).

Silly evolutionist.

You're free to believe you fantasy faith, but I'll stick to the truth of God and Christ and the true account of Creation given to us by an Eyewitness: God Himself.

I pray you will find Him.

I grant you the last word (which I won't read).
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
That’s because evolution takes place over millions of years. Obviously you won’t notice it taking place in your lifetime. Darwin’s theory has been corroborated and added to by modern science. Evolution is accepted as basic fact.

Scientific evidence DOES contradict creation, because the Bible suggests the universe is only 6,000 years old whereas we know the universe is 14 billion years old and the earth 4.5 billion. The Bible also says the earth is the center of the universe, obviously false. We know humans did not originate as Homo sapiens, we evolved from common ancestors.

It is insanely pathetic to pray for random atheists you interact with online. What an absurd waste of time.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Which therefore, by definition, means it's not science. If it's not observable or repeatable it CANNOT be called science. It can be "scientific", but not true proven science.

Case closed.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Evolution IS testable, in fact it is the most tested of all scientific theories. Microevolution is observable while macroevolution is observed through analyzing the DNA record and examining fossils.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
3 replies
Microevolution is changes within a kind and is not in dispute.

It's also got nothing to do with the fantasy fable of "macro evolution" changes from one kind to another which is non-science at all. Fossils are evidence of a past. Nothing more. They support Creation history as much as they support Evolutionary fable. They are just points of data. The non-science poured into them, such as their ages all rely on assumptions (not facts) of dating methods that are best guesses (hypotheses) not true fact. This is not "true-false" like liberals claim truth is false and false is true. This is "not true fact" as in, it's not anything that's been proven, just consensus among some who thing it's the best explanation of the evidence.

I've been debating this for years... unlearn the nonsense you've been programmed with and accept truth. You don't have to believe creation (that will come with maturity), but quit spouting lies that evolution is proven science... You look foolish. Evolution is an explanation of evidence, nothing more, that relies on guesses and possibilities (and a heck of a lot of improbability). Many agree with the guesses (until something better comes along), but it is undeniable they are only guesses (made with their eyes closed to the truth of Creation).

Check out solid scientific sites like answersingenesis.org and you'll learn quite a bit.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Even with our methods of measuring the dates of rocks, the margin of error is 50 million years. You are such a denialist clown. Nobody should take you seriously.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
You're just spouting nonsense that you've heard and regurgitating it. My sympathies. You've been corrected many times yet you won't for once think for yourself.

You science-deniers are the reason we had lockdowns for nearly two years damaging children and our country.

You science-deniers are the reason we're wasting so much effort on climate change lunacy.

You science-deniers are the reason people think it's ok to murder a child in the womb.

You science-deniers are the reason woman think they can be men, and men think they can be women.

I'm a denialist of nothing except liberal claptrap propaganda. I believe science and the truth of God's Word. They are 100% compatible.

No I give you the last word if you're so childish to need it. You'd be better off studying more and typing less.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
The Bible tells us the earth is the center of the universe, when science tells us otherwise.

The Bible tells us God created Adam, and Eve from Adam's rib, when science tells us humans evolved from a common ancestor.

The first humans arrived 5 million years ago, way before the Bible tells us the universe began. The Bible tells us Adam and Jesus lived 4,000 years apart and Jesus lived 2,000 years ago. But science tells us the universe is 13 billion years old and our earth is 4.5 billion years old.

The Bible says people will only live to 120 years old, but Jeanne Calment lived to 122.

The Bible says that God flooded the earth, neither the ark nor any evidence whatever of a great flood has ever been produced.

Need I even bring up the talking animals, people living into their 900s, demonic possession, etc...
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
>> The Bible tells us the earth is the center of the universe, when science tells us otherwise.

False. You don't understand language and idioms

>> The Bible tells us God created Adam, and Eve from Adam's rib, when science tells us humans evolved from a common ancestor.

You've already been corrected that science proves nothing about evolution. But that error aside, we DO come from a common ancestor. Adam and Eve (and Noah and his wife technically speaking)

>>The first humans arrived 5 million years ago, way before the Bible tells us the universe began. The Bible tells us Adam and Jesus lived 4,000 years apart and Jesus lived 2,000 years ago. But science tells us the universe is 13 billion years old and our earth is 4.5 billion years old.

False. No evidence to support that humans or the earth or the universe has been here longer than about 6,000 years. None. There is evidence, as I've taught you... but the methods for dating that evidence rely on guesses and suppositions, not science. Do some research.

>>The Bible says people will only live to 120 years old, but Jeanne Calment lived to 122.

120 was a generality. Before the Flood people lived even longer. Most live much less than 120 years obviously. But we actually will all live eternally. Some of us with God and sadly many apart from Him.

>>The Bible says that God flooded the earth, neither the ark nor any evidence whatever of a great flood has ever been produced.

There have been purported findings of the Ark on Ararat, but Turkey is not open for exploration. But I would not expect the Ark to have survived for so long. However, the evidence of the Universal Flood is widespread (but dismissed by anti-science folks like yourself since you start with a false notion that God is not real and thus the history revealed in His Word cannot be true and then from there you go off the rails completely). No, the universal flood is readily apparent from the fossil record, stratification layers and more.

>>Need I even bring up the talking animals, people living into their 900s, demonic possession, etc...

You can since of course they are all true. God who created everything from nothing could easily give a donkey the ability to speak for a brief period of a specific purpose. People living in their 900s, before the wear down of genetic reproduction and the changing conditions of the earth post-flood, not an issue in the slighest. Demonic possession is not prevalent today - but was real for sure
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
That is all science is, is an explanation of evidence. There is no definitive proof beyond a shadow of a doubt. We support the theories that our evidence leads us to, and right now that is the theory of evolution. Since Darwin authored the Origin of Species 150+ years ago, scientists have been adding onto his theory of evolution and it all points in the direction that suggests Darwin was correct. If we learn otherwise, we will change our minds.

You rely on a fantasy book from 2,000 years ago that is loaded with fallacies, inconsistencies and impossibilities. There is absolutely nothing mature about relying on that. You should be making the opposite conclusion, that science has proven many things about the Bible to be wrong, especially concerning creation and our relationship with the universe, but you don't, because you are stubborn and you deny science.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
You're deliberately being obtuse now. You cannot just define science to be what you imagine it to be. It has a definition.

Science: knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method

Scientific Method: principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses

Evolution (as we're discussing and Darwin fantasized) has never been observed or tested. Therefore it is NOT science and no true scientist would ever claim it to be. It's a theory and nothing more. A theory to explain the true, hard, solid evidence that we have. Evidence that as been shown to support the Creation history equally without a single contradiction. In fact, as new evidence comes along, evolutionary myth has to be adjusted to fit the evidence (oops, we missed that!), whereas the creation account has never needed to alter at all since it's 100% true.

As for your second paragraph of complete lies, it deserves no comment. I do not deny science at all and have said nothing here that could misconstrued as such. I embrace science completely. God gave us science: physics, astronomy, geology, chemistry are all part of His creation. Science is nothing to eschew or be afraid of. Likewise it's not something to adulterate by forcing non-science theories like evolution into. Science has not disproven God's Word one time. You're relying on idiots and their ignorance and "gotcha" nonsense. Whereas, if you actually study God's Word as did Newton and many other historical scientists, you will find science in complete harmony with the Bible. And just perhaps as you find yourself face to face with the Living Creator God, you'll reject your man-centered beliefs and trust in Him through His Son.

I pray for you to have this clarity and wisdom.

Until then, there is no more to discuss.
0 ups, 2y
But with bacteria we can witness evolution in our lifetimes! MRSA-filled heavens!
1 up, 2y
Richard dawkins memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
Did you know, Christians were so terrified of the teaching of evolutionary biology that they criminalized it in many southern states, this culminated in the infamous Scopes trial. FUN FACTS WITH RICHARD DAWKINS