She who laughs last, laughs best.

So, you admit that there is a Deep State Conspiracy against Trump.

Judge Middlebrooks was a Trump appointee.

You might want to double-check your source for that information.

You could be right, I shall check on that.

You are right, I shall make the appropriate correction. Something the unhinged Right never does.

So what?

There's more evidence to support the existence of the Tooth Fairy, than there is to support a so called "Deep State." It is not unusual for Paranoid people to think everyone is out to get them.

Ridiculous

Yes, the idea that there is a "Deep State," out to get Trump is ridiculous. He is just a hate filled man saying and doing hateful things to people less powerful than him. People don't like bullies, even if they share political leanings.

You claim to have been involved with the gov't on different levels and you claim the "deep State" doesn't exist...the two statements can't possibly be correct.

I've been involved with the government on different levels and I know the "deep state" is a right-wing fantasy. The unhinged Right uses the "deep state" mantra whenever they've run out of logical explanations.

The “Deep State” is real.
The “Insurrection” is a left-wing Democrat fantasy. The unhinged Left uses the “Insurrection” mantra whenever they’ve nothing else to offer the people in the way of logical governance.

Almost 400-extremists have been convicted of or pled guilty to crimes related to the "non-insurrection." There are abundant videos of their offenses. The "Deep State," exists in the paranoid delusions of people who cannot accept the fact that they lost an election, fair and square. We have seen their type many times. They throw fits when their little kid strikes out at a little league game and honk their horns at old ladies "driving safely." Grandma Caird had the best advice for dealing with their stupid reactions. "Consider the source, and act accordingly."

Al Gore-2000
John Kerry-2004
Hillary Clinton-2016

You are helping me make my point. Democrats were disappointed in all those losses. The Bush-Gore loss was litigated. The Clinton loss was muddied by Putin's large scale social media activities in support of Trump, which were confirmed by a Republican held Senate. But none of these resulted in a mob uprising publicly egged on at his rally and assisted by 3-hours of inaction. Everyone processes the grief of loss differently. Extremists often turn it into violence as we saw on the left in the late 1960's and the right on 1-6-21.

"Come on now," Michigan Judge Cynthia Stephens said while looking over the evidence presented by the president's lawyers, which alleged a poll watcher had been instructed to back-date late-arriving mail-in ballots to make them count. "What I have, at best, is a hearsay affidavit." This is from an ABC News story filed 11-7-20. It cited judges in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada and Georgia demanding admissible evidence from Trump's lawyers. The Trump lawyers presented only "Hearsay." Within days after the election a pattern of frivilous lawsuits lacking admissible evidence resulted in dozens of judges, many of them Trump appointees, asking for evidence that was never presented. Why? Hard evidence that could be litigated does not exist.

My point was that all of them said that their elections were stolen.
They were allowed to present whatever evidence they had and there were recounts.
Trump and his Campaign were not allowed to present evidence.
You're a partisan propagandist and I never expect you to be fair and honest.

Your lack of originality is underwhelming.

I figured if I use your template, there would be a less likely chance of you being able to flag me and have me timered…yet again.

I faithfully served on the staff of three members of two different Republican President's Cabinets. The only time I did not immediately carry out an order was when I was asked to do something illegal, that probably would have got me fired. I advised one particularly impetuous one to not use the power of the government to illegally try to sabotage the success of a film he objected to. If there was a "Deep State," I would have let him do it, he would have been caught misusing his office dragging him into a controversy with a very popular actor. The Deep State is a fantasy made up out of whole cloth. The idea appeals to people who can't deal with the two-party system, in which they don't get their way all of the time.

Total crap...

"Deep State" is total crap.

Nope... Chuck Schumer confirmed it... OOPS