Agreed. From what I can see, there was all kinds of probable cause for the search warrant. We're talking about highly classified material here, folks. If I took top secret SCI material home from my job...well, I would surely regret it.

Your home would be stormed like the D day invasion and you would be arrested on the spot. A rational person has to only ask one Q

Q: Did he have actual LEGAL possesion of the documents if yes then it's a nothing burger

If he had ILLEGAL possesion of them then he should be in jail at this very moment awaiting trial.

You are 100% correct. Anything outside of the SCIF would be an illegal possession.

WhIch leads to another question...how was the transport from the White House to Mar-a-Lago accomplished? Brinks armored truck? Commercial moving van? Something in between? So many questions...

Trump has and will throw anyone he needs to under the "bus" And his actions have put many people are legal risk. Anyone without clerarance who even "touched" those boxes can be charged and they can be charged for every single page of classified documents.

So if you haver lets say 35 classified documents that is 35 charges

BREAKING: The FBI affiant who swore to the Mar-a-Lago search warrant appears to have made a critical factual error by stating in the unsealed affidavit: “I do not believe that any spaces within the PREMISES have been authorized for the storage of classified information.” This finding, which is the linchpin of the criminal case vs. Trump, overlooks the fact that:

1) White House records confirm that a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) authorizing the briefing and storage of classified material up to the TS/SCI level had in fact been installed at Mar-a-Lago; and,

2) records show that the Secret Service had recently awarded a nearly $600,000 contract to upgrade physical security within the premises at Mar-a-Lago for Trump’s post-presidency transition

DEVELOPING: The unsealed FBI affidavit contains several oddities:

1. No where does it flat-out say “classified information” was found in Trump’s 15 boxes. On page 2, it refers only to docs “with classification markings,” which raises the specter they were no longer classified

2. It states the docs “appear” to contain National Defense Information. But agents “triaged” the boxes; they would know if they contain NDI or not

3. The affiant claimed “there is probable cause to believe evidence of obstruction will be found at the premises,” yet there’s no “obstruction” header or section spelling out why he believes this

4. He said he doesn’t believe “any spaces” w/in Mar-a-Lago are “currently” authorized for storage of classified info. So they were, but not “currently”?