Services rendered

But when a Democrat does it, you're ok with it.

Your butthurt's showing again, M.P.

Graft, more likely.

Hard to say; being/having been POTUS is both like turning demand up to 11 and a gigantic celebrity multiplier. Although, making a blanket statement in answer to a blanket statement doesn't reflect well on Ms. Guilfoyle... are you certain that's the tack you wish to take?

Clinton Foundation donations dried up as soon as neither Clinton was in government office. Bill’s speaking engagements also came to a halt. Guilfoyle never held any position of governmental power.

Have you seen the Clinton Foundation's tax filings and know that to be true or are you repeating what you've been fed?

In Ms. Guilfoyle's case, that's fair; at best, she'd only be guilty of accepting a bribe or in exchange for influence seeing as how she only had the ear of someone who had the ear of the POTUS... that or just run-of-the-mill money laundering given her relatively low-level celebrity as a hanger-on. Thank you for giving me the opening to point that out. : )

So, you are accusing news organizations of being inaccurate?

Guilfoyle has never held any position of federal governmental authority; both Clinton’s have. Guilfoyle having influence over Trump through someone else is so laughable. Seven years on camera at a national tv network is credible celebrity status.

"So, you are accusing news organizations of being inaccurate?"

No, I'm not accusing news organizations of being inaccurate -I'm asking you if you have seen the Clinton Foundation's tax filings and know what you said to be fact. It was an unambiguously worded question, R.T. but you seem to be struggling to comprehend it.

"Guilfoyle has never held any position of federal governmental authority"

Yes, Guilfoyle's lack of officialdom was already acknowledged; it seems we're revisiting a lack of reading comprehension on your part.

"Guilfoyle having influence over Trump through someone else is so laughable."

Guilfoyle did, at the time, and does of present have Donald Trump Jr.'s ear, who, in turn, has Donald Trump Sr.'s ear. Did you forget about that? Or maybe you're implying that Sr. ignores his son?

"Seven years on camera at a national tv network is credible celebrity status."

At no point did I state Guilfoyle had no "credible celebrity status" --we seem to be continuing to run afoul of a lack of reading comprehension on your part; my exact words were "low-level celebrity as a hanger-on," in fact. Of course, one could argue that being on a national network isn't "low-level celebrity" but that would be ignoring the fact that far more people don't watch FOX than do.

To wit: if one says "Scottie Pippen," people across the entire network-television viewing spectrum will likely have some idea of who is being discussed and he's not even all that popular. Conversely, if one says "Kimberly Guilfoyle" a majority of people are likely to either ask "Isn't that the woman banging Don Jr./was married to Gavin Newsome?" or state flatly "Oh, right...the woman who's banging Don Jr./was married to Gavin Newsome."

Just make stuff up. But you are entitled to your opinion.

I’d be willing to bet that more people have seen Guilfoyle on TV they have seen her banging Don Junior