Imgflip Logo Icon

Hypothetically speaking...

Hypothetically speaking... | LET'S SAY -HYPOTHETICALLY, MIND YOU- SOME GUY PULLED A FEW STRINGS AT CITY HALL AND HAD A WIDOW'S HOUSE CONDEMNED... "WHY?" YOU MIGHT ASK. BECAUSE HE WANTED HER OUT OF THE WAY SO HE COULD KNOCK THE HOUSE DOWN AND BUILD A PARKING LOT... ...FOR LIMOUSINES. WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT GUY WOULD HAVE TO BE ONE SERIOUSLY EVIL PIECE OF SHIT TO PULL SOMETHING LIKE THAT, CAN'T WE? NOW LET'S ADD ANOTHER LAYER; LET'S SAY THE WIDOW TAKES THE AFOREMENTIONED EVIL SHIT TO COURT, SUES HER WAY BACK INTO POSSESSION OF WHAT WAS RIGHTFULLY HERS FROM THE JUMP... AND THAT DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH JOHNNY P.O.S. SO HE STARTS BUILDING A WING ONTO HIS OWN BUILDING EXTENDING OUT OVER THE WIDOW'S HOUSE; YEAH, WE'RE NOT DONE YET...  SEE, SOMEHOW, AFTER THIS WING IS OUT OVER THE WIDOW'S HOUSE, HER ROOF IS SET ON FIRE... OH, AND I FORGOT TO MENTION JOHNNY P.O.S. IS WELL KNOWN FOR BEING A VINDICTIVE LI'L PUNK...
  
THAT'S AN AWFULLY CONVENIENT FIRE, ISN'T IT? ANYHOO... -HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING- THIS JOHNNY P.O.S. ISN'T SOMEONE ANY OF US WOULD WANT HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE, RIGHT? | image tagged in george carlin,carlin | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
177 views 3 upvotes Made by XiaoJia 2 years ago in politics
9 Comments
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Hypothetically speaking, the man would be in his right to have a building condemned for Imminent domain as said building would generate millions in tax dollars and benefit all residents. Moreover, hypothetically, the man would offer her double the FMV of the property. Hypothetically, I would want a man like that in power; someone who could empower state and local politicians to attend to his agenda. Such a leader, hypothetically, would be an amazing leader.
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Also, hypothetically speaking, a person who spent time making a meme like this has severe TDS.
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Also, hypothetically speaking, a smart Johnny would offer the Widow a ton of money that would let her buy a better house and be set for life. What this meme is talking about is a Silent Movie/Snidely Whiplash scenario which I'm pretty sure is illegal nowadays.
0 ups, 2y
To prequel the hypothetical, let's say a sum was offered and the Widow refused sale in accordance with her rights of ownership.
0 ups, 2y
Oh, meant to say this earlier - I like the capitalization on "Widow"; it's got gravitas. Nice!
0 ups, 2y
Michael Scott | TDS? YOU'RE THE ONE MAKING IT ALL ABOUT TRUMP, BUDDY. | image tagged in michael scott | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
So you're saying you're in favor of one citizen trampling another citizen's rights of ownership because "more tax dollars"? Is that what you're saying, PoorBarryakaTaxGuy?
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Didn’t she win? How’s that him trampling her rights?
0 ups, 2y
Whether she won or not is irrelevant to whether you do or do not support one citizen trampling another citizen's rights of ownership. In any case, it was a rhetorical question intended to distill your stated position down to its bare bones for anyone not quite certain what was happening. I also wanted to see if you'd try to deflect. And you did.

But let's circle back to something else you said in your initial comment:

"Hypothetically, I would want a man like that in power; someone who could empower state and local politicians to attend to his agenda."

The leader does not empower state and local officials; state and local officials' power comes from the law. What you're describing is a dictator. I have to say...I did not expect you to openly profess to desiring a dictatorship.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 8
  • george carlin
  • carlin
  • george carlin
  • carlin
  • carlin
  • george carlin
  • carlin
  • carlin
  • george carlin
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    LET'S SAY -HYPOTHETICALLY, MIND YOU- SOME GUY PULLED A FEW STRINGS AT CITY HALL AND HAD A WIDOW'S HOUSE CONDEMNED... "WHY?" YOU MIGHT ASK. BECAUSE HE WANTED HER OUT OF THE WAY SO HE COULD KNOCK THE HOUSE DOWN AND BUILD A PARKING LOT... ...FOR LIMOUSINES. WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT GUY WOULD HAVE TO BE ONE SERIOUSLY EVIL PIECE OF SHIT TO PULL SOMETHING LIKE THAT, CAN'T WE? NOW LET'S ADD ANOTHER LAYER; LET'S SAY THE WIDOW TAKES THE AFOREMENTIONED EVIL SHIT TO COURT, SUES HER WAY BACK INTO POSSESSION OF WHAT WAS RIGHTFULLY HERS FROM THE JUMP... AND THAT DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH JOHNNY P.O.S. SO HE STARTS BUILDING A WING ONTO HIS OWN BUILDING EXTENDING OUT OVER THE WIDOW'S HOUSE; YEAH, WE'RE NOT DONE YET... SEE, SOMEHOW, AFTER THIS WING IS OUT OVER THE WIDOW'S HOUSE, HER ROOF IS SET ON FIRE... OH, AND I FORGOT TO MENTION JOHNNY P.O.S. IS WELL KNOWN FOR BEING A VINDICTIVE LI'L PUNK... THAT'S AN AWFULLY CONVENIENT FIRE, ISN'T IT? ANYHOO... -HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING- THIS JOHNNY P.O.S. ISN'T SOMEONE ANY OF US WOULD WANT HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE, RIGHT?