ALL gun laws are unconstitutional.

Civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens
Teach Coxe.

The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but where, I trust in God, it will always remain, in the hands of the people.
Teach Coxe

AHAHAHAHA no.
The 2nd amendment was made for militias to protect the country, that was centuries ago. Now militias are unneeded and guns are making people die.

Read the quote above "neither the federal nor the state, but the people.

Seriously! The ignorance of liberals is unreal.

Please see my reply to another liberal who is likewise clueless concerning the purpose and intent of the 2nd Amendment. The conversation was over when it was adopted into the Constitution, unless you want to organize a Constitutional Convention to have it ratified or removed. Until such time it remains the law of the land.

Unlike the highly flawed and evil Roe v Wade ruling that is about to be overturned . . .

A well regulated militia *COMMA* being necessary to the security of a free state *COMMMA*, the right OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS *COMMA* shall not be infringed.

Liberals are ignorant beyond compare when it comes to basic sentence structure, as well as all of history. The primary author of the Constitution is quoted above, and eliminates the liberal's misinterpretation of this Amendment.

I shall reword it to help y'all out, not that there is a chance in Hell that doing so will change the minds of the intentionally ignorant.

Given that a free state requires an active military force to maintain said freedom from aggressive countries (such as England of the 1700s), and given that history is replete with governments moving towards tyranny against it's own citizens, citizens will have the right to bear arms throughout all time so long as an active military is necessary, so that they may repel such a tyranny and return to a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. This right shall not be infringed, regardless of how many innocent people are murdered by Democrats.

My paraphrase is supported by the many writings of those who were behind the Constitution, and the subsequent Amendments called the Bill of Rights.

Ye Olde Founding Fathers couldn't afford a standing professional army,
Conscripting (WASP) men on the spot on their own disme was basically their only option.

The language seemeth pretty cleareth.

Hope this clarifies things!

If I had a disme for every time a liberal got the intent of the 2nd Amendment wrong, I could buy a tank!

btw- I see someone had some butthurt over my pointing out the basic nature of the posts you make . . . I am sure it wasn't you because you see nothing wrong with what you are doing.