Believe it or not, some people aren’t as heartless as you.

My niece's first son died in uterus. 18 years later, with two younger children, she still grieves over him.

Would've had an older bro or sis. Probably one of the reasons why I'm pro-life. Realized the opportunities lost.

I have 5 dead siblings 😄

Guess none of those count as human lives 😃

We love liberals 😀

Kill me 😐

Do you realise that being an unwanted baby is a f**king terrible life?

“‘Dying' before you can feel pain or any emotions, is far better than being born to someone who is unable to provide you proper housing, food, education, care, love and affection...”
Now you’ve failed to explain why the child couldn’t simply just commit suicide if they decided their life wasn’t worth living.

Yes, but being a murdered baby is a pretty terrible death as well. Plus, if the baby doesn’t like it they can kill themself. The right to life doesn’t imply they’re forced to live, it simply implies they’re not forced to die.
The problem with your little relativistic, hedonistic, and overall narcissistic belief spreads to born children as well.
If you truly believe what you claim, why aren’t you fighting for all children in foster care to be euthanized? If you truly believe a fetus can be killed simply because it isn’t a “full” human being, why can’t I simply kill anyone missing a limb? If a fetus can be killed because it isn’t conscious, why can’t I kill someone who’s asleep? If a fetus doesn’t count as a life because it can’t fend for itself, does that mean we should euthanize anyone on welfare? If a fetus doesn’t count as a life because it can’t reproduce can I kill any girl on birth control? If a fetus doesn’t count as a human life because it relies on someone else’s recourses to live, can I kill someone simply for breathing in the oxygen that the trees in my yard produced?
It’s all the same things that slave owners argued. They claimed blacks were dumber than whites and therefore a white man could choose what a black man does, even if that’s dying. Sounds similar to the argument that since a woman is born and fully developed mentally, she has the right to kill a pre-born child. But at what level does that stop? For an example Elon Musk is generally believed to have an IQ of 160 or so, but the average person has an IQ of about 95 in the US. You could argue because of that Elon Musk is in fact more conscious than 99/100 people and therefore has the right to decide what’s good for them. Brain Shaw can lift more than probably about 99.9% and is taller than 99% of the population, does that earn him the right to rule over people who’re physically inferior?
Now you could argue that a fetus is in a woman’s body, but if that’s the case what about born children? They’re living in their parents house, they’re living off their mother’s milk, so why can’t the parents simply kill those children if they decide they’re an inconvenience?

Unlike children outside of the body, they can't feel pain or have any kind of consciousness. Is pulling the plug on a braindead person who doesn't have consciousness also murder? Andd, no, the parents shouldn't kill children with consciousness. Because sometimes 'dying' (before you have consciousness or can feel pain) is a far better option than being born to parents who don't want you.

Wow, you seriously went to that half-assed argument? Well, what if you knew the brain dead person would suddenly awaken in less than a year, what then? A brain dead person’s brain is no longer functional, a fetus’ brain is not yet functional. If you cannot understand the difference there, I think you may be brain dead yourself.

If a fetus counts as a human being, then it also isn't allowed inside someone's body without their permission.

But by having sex you put them there through your own permission. Yes, there’s rape, but do you believe abortion should be accessible outside of rape? If so then rape is entirely irrelevant.

So people shouldn't be able to have any sex because they would have to 'kill' an unconscious jellybean that can't feel pain??

No, where did you get jellybeans from? Stay on subject. They can have sex, but by doing so they’re accepting the chance that they may conceive a child. I’m starting to understand why you named yourself after an animal famed for it’s cannibalism.

Why would ending a life (that has not even begun) of a thing that can't feel pain, can't know it's being 'killed' or have any sort of consciousness harm anyone??

You still haven’t explained to me in what way the life hasn’t begun. And once again that argument applies for someone that’s asleep or in coma as well. You’re basically saying as long as you use general anesthesia before hand you can kill someone. The definition of harm is “physical injury, especially that which is deliberately inflicted.”, that account for an injury that isn’t felt, so yes killing a preborn child is in fact harming someone.

'Dying' before you can feel pain or any emotions, is far better than being born to someone who is unable to provide you proper housing, food, education, care, love and affection...

And, hey, stay on the topic. My name has nothing to do with this. Axolotls are cute.

I was still staying on topic because it was an observation regarding the conversation. You’re advocating for killing your own species and I pointed out that you named yourself after an animal which is known for eating it’s own species. On the contrary you randomly brought up candy.

Speaking of which it also seems you see your own species as candy since you brought up jelly beans, so that gives further insight towards the possibility you may in fact be a cannibal.

That... Doesn't make... Any freaking sense?? I don't go digging in the garbage cans of abortion clinics to eat fetuses.