Conservative Party exposes extremist thugs & brings you facts the MSM won’t tell you. #MSMLies

Where beans?

Screenshot wasn’t to clear
When the New Zealand mass shooter wanted to move to ukr, you might have problem

A global network of Nazi extremists, why aren’t the Democrats doing more to stop them?

I thought you were an Azov fanboy now

If a proud boy wore a patch, that must mean he’s pro proud boy now too lol

huh?

Sloth playing both sides, the patch on the proud boy looks fake considering it’s over a cress on the shirt lol

yeah, took me a second

To the front of the class!

Now that’s a cheat sheet

Out with Azov, in with the Proud Boys! #BuyAmerican

they literally have nothing to do with each other, the patch in the picture is fake

Far-right militia groups in America and far-right militia groups in Ukraine have nothing to do with each other — that’s a matter of perspective I suppose

National Socialists aren't far right......

Debate all you want about what orientation Hitler was, but we know who these guys are

Fascist is different from National Socialist....

debate all you want, you're doing the devil's work

If they aren’t far right, who is?

what kind of an argument is that?

let me spell it out for you
National Socialists (which Nazi is slang for), are guess what? SOCIALISTS
Now, do you know, are socialists on the left, or the right?

1920’s German socialist party turned into nazis but also had the Thule society ideology mixed with it. Where you see both nationalism and socialism mix until 33

But see, I don't know why nationalism should be considered inherently right or left. Look at Communist China.
I suppose you could make the argument that economically left vs right is different from socially left vs right though
but at that point how can you say a mix of socially right and economically left (or vice versa) is either left or right?

But see, I don't know why nationalism should be considered inherently right or left. Look at Communist China.
I suppose you could make the argument that economically left vs right is different from socially left vs right though
but at that point how can you say a mix of socially right and economically left (or vice versa) is either left or right

Yea pretty much. everything is so hyper partisan atm and quite different from the early 20th century. They just want to argue modern perspectives to old paradigms. Socialism was popular back then when ppl where poor af or suffered through civil wars, but it’s still pretty much internationalism vs nationalism

I have a book somewhere he wrote in 1928-29 where he self proclaims to be a socialist. Don’t see ppl quoting his second book to often

which book was that? I think I've heard of it, I just can't remember

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 🇰🇵 vs. The United Kingdom 🇬🇧

If you were an alien landing on earth looking for a country with a representative system of government, you might be confused

there's demonstrable proof that North Korea is not democratic
there is no demonstrable proof that National Socialist Germany was not socialist

https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-nazis-socialists

You asked for demonstrable proof. Well here is quite a bit of history, and as .IG. says, ‘33 is a good year to identify as a turning-point in Nazi history as in that year the party purged Communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews from the civil service, and outlawed trade unions — which was a gift to the Nazis’ industrialist backers.

If there were any left-leaning groups in the Nazi movement prior to that, there weren’t anymore.

you mean the Jews that they socialized the property of?
and the industries that the government had control over?

and communists kill other communists all the time, but that doesn't make them not communist

With influences of the church pushing fascism and Jews declaring war in 33. they turn to more limited upper class based socialism. Industry owners share ownership of Germany and its perk….(usage of slave labor, claiming of property and natural resources)

This is the article from where I screehshot those quotes:

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-hitler-gop-brooks-gohmert

Aye about Hitler, although it is funny the disadain he had for his broader base and potential recruits as he stated in the first quote. Kind of reminiscent of his orange wannabe apprentice today or even, dare say I, the Founding Fathers, who came up with the Electoral College as a compromise when they relented and granted the common (White Protestant land owning) man the right to vote, thinking most of them too deficient to vote wisely...

A couple things about Ghandi though, his movement for liberating Indians from the shackles of Apartheid in South Africa was criticized for excluding Africans, he stating that that was their own struggle for them to pursue, as he did for his own people.

One struggle he was willing to engage in in South Africa involving Africans was the Zulu rebellion when he was younger - in service of his British masters. He joined the British military, but as with other Indians, was not allowed to be armed or engage in combat. He implored the British Crown for a chance to prove his and his fellow Indians' loyalty and worth to them if given the chance to shoot Zulus in defense of the Empire. On the spectrum that spans German Nazis and the British Empire, he ranked far closer to them than he did with his later Civil Disobedience stance.

In hs I had read two of his personal letters written to someone in his later years. In the first, he was saying about monkeys raiding his crops, that they to were part of the universe, creatures just like us created by the Divine, so what's wrong with them getting a share of the crops?
Another letter sometime later witnessed a change in attitude, as a little sharing had blossomed into a growing nuisance. He then saw reason to shoot them, as he had toiled hard in the fields for himself and family, and that if they want, they can go do the same elsewhere. I can see where he's coming from, but it left a bad taste in my mouth. Ever since then, that's who Ghandi was to me.

In the end, on some scale, it can so easily become us vs them

Hey, cherry picking is all fun n stuff, as well as 'playing,' but the point is what when I'm the one that assembled that image out of screenshots which I filtered to make aesthetically pleasing-er?

This is Hitler we're talking about. Der fuhrer, untermensch, etc, not ring any bells? What's does that mean "he wasn't saying rich people are a higher race" because something something about Jews? Oh wait, he was saying captains of industry are a higher race, so you almost got me.

Anyways if you disagree with Hitler that he himself said what he said, then take it up with him. Getting everything (deliberately) backwards isn't exactly going to get him to confirm your partisan revisionist Newspeaking at this juncture.

This was already explained to you by others as well and it begins to bore me a lot?

1. Read the meme. ACTUALLY read it, for REAL real.

You clearly haven't, not only not understanding it or not getting any of the points, but even missing a standout statement about "higher races" as well as what was in the title, particularly the last line (which, incidentally, was a last minute addition as I had a feeling the point would be missed by many).

2. Look up "Socialism."
Hitler was a dictator, not part of a by-consensus voting body. He wasn't even elected, so not even a representative, not that a solitary figure such as that would count.

I did read it. Maybe you should.
"Our heads of industry are not concerned with the accumulation of wealth and the good life,"
Yeah sure sounds capitalist to me
He's not saying rich people are a higher race. I don't know how you could possibly think so. If you're not convinced of that, why'd he kill the Jews and confiscate their property? They were successful in business, so surely they should count as the "higher races" that Hitler is referring to here.
I don't give a crap what you put in the title, it has absolutely zero bearing on what he actually said.

"a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the community as a whole, usually through a centralized government."
Huh, usually through a centralized government. Wow it's almost like I was right. Who would've thunk it.

"Did you even read before adding the image?

State control of the economy is socialism. Just cause Hitler doesn't like Marxism doesn't make him a capitalist. He hated capitalism for the same reason he hated Marxism. He thought the Jews were behind it."

No, I only spent 2 days making that thing. Well, 2.5.
Perhaps you should read it too?

State control of the economy is NOT socialism. Workers controlling the economy is THE definition of Socialism.

"He hated capitalism for the same reason he hated Marxism."

Again, read the image, including the title.
Does anyone think he's stupid enough to ruin the economy and no state intervention unless needed in the case that the people imperil it? Leaders of industry are members of a higher race?

Again, Hitler was a Corporatist, just like we are in America.

You clearly haven't

it quite literally is. How are the workers supposed to control the economy if not through the state? That's how socialism works.

"Leaders of industry are members of a higher race?"
What in the heck are you even talking about.

if corporatist means the government controlling the economy, then sure. Still a socialist.

"there is no demonstrable proof that National Socialist Germany was not socialist"

Such as?

Hitler & the Nazis were as far as anyone can get from Socialism. In fact, he expunged any links the party originally had to it (which was prior to his joining).

Did you even read before adding the image?

State control of the economy is socialism. Just cause Hitler doesn't like Marxism doesn't make him a capitalist. He hated capitalism for the same reason he hated Marxism. He thought the Jews were behind it.

That’s… very well put-together. And chilling.

I hate having to engage with Hitler’s words, since it’s so evil. But he really lays it out here: the basis for organizing a modern society around “race hierarchy.” And that is the essence of what makes Hitler and his modern-day acolytes “far-right,” in spite of their misappropriation of the then-popular concept of “socialism.” It’s the fusion of modern industrialized power with ancient tribal resentments that is capable of unleashing carnage on such a massive scale.

Hitler was an original thinker in that way, the way he reveled in it and regarded it as an absolute good — though it should be noted and remembered by those of us who consider themselves proponents of “freedom” and “democracy” that he took note of similar race hierarchies in the British colonies and United States. Gandhi wrote to Hitler that he resisted both Nazism and imperialism in equal measure, that the two evils were only different in degree.

Necessary to understand in order for history to not be repeated.

Tell that to the Far Right that idolizes them.

they're just as retarded as the leftists

gottem

I guess

https://triad-city-beat.com/the-lost-boys-of-ukraine/
From 2020, they sure do

Ukr rolled in with the grads and pounded civilians. Ukraine crisis. Decent old documentary

“I don’t want Congress to fund Ukraine, because Ukraine also has far-right patriotic bubbas who cosplay in military fatigues and drill as militiamen on the weekends just like me.”

—Average politics user

Lord of war