Republicans want to entrust our most intimate freedoms to a bunch of glorified schoolboard members. What could go wrong?

I agree. No state should have the power to legalize infanticide. But one step at a time ;)

Right, abortion is infanticide, and this is a cake

It doesn’t mean that you should just throw away the cake. You cook the cake, you let it sit for a few moments in the oven, then you take it out (birth). The cake, as it is being carried to the centerpiece, enjoys its childhood. Then, it is placed in the real world and drained of its strength very slowly until it is fully consumed (dies.) That is life. Besides, the woman’s body is constantly working to care for the embryo/fetus. That cake is already cooking itself, except if you take it out of oven and discard it prematurely, you will never get it back. Doing a service to the world by letting that cake cook and that baby develop would be appreciated.

appreciated by who?

The baby and I think the world – in the future.

Ad hominem. That is irrelevant

What does your accusation of me being raised in a farm do to support your argument. Besides, I live in SoCal so even if it was relevant it is an incorrect assumption.

Why do you want to condemn souls to poverty and pain mental and physical? -

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan-Litrownik/publication/226139536_Mental_Health_Problems_of_Children_in_Foster_Care/links/56e34da408ae68afa10ca98f/Mental-Health-Problems-of-Children-in-Foster-Care.pdf

So that they can be Baptized and eventually go to heaven to see God. Abortion deprives them of that ability to be Baptized. This isn’t just about their life on Earth, but the afterlife in heaven as well, which is why I am against abortion.

A fetus is not a person, a breathing baby is... why do you condemn them to bodies and miserable lives that no one wants? Who are you to force your will on these souls?

2:7 "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."

Why do you want to condemn them to death? Is being dead better then living in tough times? Do you believe that there is no hope whatsoever for those innocent people? What is a person then? And who gets to make the choice? Do you get to decide whose lives are wanted and unwanted? And yes, life is a very, very harsh thing. Forget it, it’s useless to argue with you. Hell, what would it take for you to abandon abortion? Would you abandon it if world hunger and homeless were solved, or do we need to cure cancer first, or do we need everybody to be economically stable?! When can we let the unborn follow its instincts? Surely abortion isn’t just some final solution!

they are not alive. full stop.

They could be if they had a chance. Give them 9 months and they will be alive.

Whos business is it of yours? what chance does a baby already addicted to drugs have? who made you God? A person carrying around a gun is a real threat to me, a person deciding not to condemn a soul to a life of misery is no threat to you nor any of your or anyones business.... you going to take care of all of them are you?>

Fine. Let them die. Let those harmless little organisms dissolve into grime. Does this satisfy you?

You going to provide all the added welfare and social services? Housing? food? the hubris ....

Read previous reply. Fine, you win, obviously humanity is not worth preserving for you. Who am I, a random Christian teenager, to argue against you when our ethical codes aren’t even aligned.

Infant - Fetus ------ Those are two different words. You should look them up.

Never happens. Facts just get in the way of their indignation