Non sequitur. (aka deflection... <<<=== that's so the libtards in the audience can know what I'm saying...)
When you can't refute the actual issue being discussed, just pivot to something else that's not related at all. That's the only tactic available when you're just dead wrong.,
In this case, you're attempting to deflect by talking about one person's voting irregularity. When in actuality, you could have discussed an entire party's voting irregularity as evidenced by GPS data. But you won't go there...
