More mail in ballots yet less ballot rejections?

Bingo!

You mean you’re still surprised so many people used mail-in ballots during a pandemic?

Not surprised at all. The democrats pushed for it to cover the fraud. The surprising thing is that your not interested in a blatant distortion of statistical fact. A huge bump in mail in ballots should not lead to a lower rejection percentage. It should lead to an equal or greater rejection percentage.

Equivalent percentage rise is not a guarantee.

Given the extenuating circumstances; many states had lifted severe restrictions on what qualified someone vote by mail. Due to the fact that this was not the same way people had voted and likely people had the advantage of voting in a place they’re more relaxed could’ve made them less prone to making mistakes. And with the advent of more and more households using the internet this can also lead to increased chances of ballots being successfully mailed and addressed correctly.

So, again, I’m not sure why you would find that unusual.

Maybe you’re just looking for something that isn’t there.

In any case, I don’t think this isn’t the “red flag” that can indisputablely prove fraud.

Ya equivalent percentage rise didn’t really happen nor did it stay the same, it reduced. This is a mathematical unlikelihood. I never claimed it was indisputable just that it’s an indicator along with various other indicators including showing election box stuffing. It was not the most secure election in our history. It was the most suspect.

Actually, it is a mathematical likelihood. Overall the national reduction was between 0.8% to 1.4%…. A difference of 0.6%… that is not unusual.

This actually has no indication of ballot box stuffing. It is only a measurement of rejected ballots. Ballots may be rejected for many of reasons. Chief among them are minor errors to follow the directions. Any situation of ballot duplication or otherwise fraudulent ballots are reviewed and most are disqualified.

True, the system isn’t perfect but a decimal percentage of valid votes failed to count to invalid votes getting through do not usually make much of a difference anyway. And states where the vote is close enough that they would, are better scrutinized in the recounting process.

So no, it’s not an indicator of ballot stuffing nor does it put in dispute that the election wasn’t as secure as was claimed.

Never said this was an indicator of ballot stuffing. There is video evidence of that at drop boxes. Considering the margin of victory even a small percentage of invalid votes makes a difference. And if you have a rejection rate of 3 percent normally and you double the amount of votes and get a rejection rate less than half the standard that is questionable. Conjecture that people just did a better job on the ballots is supposition and unlikely. It was not the most secure election in our history or in the last decade. That’s a bold face lie. It is the most suspect election in our history though, with a huge percentage of Americans questioning it and with good reason regardless of the screechers saying otherwise.