It clearly states in the Pfizer trials that pregnant women should not take the shot but they pushed it anyway.

Get another booster...

Win Win...

So, once again, you're going to be liable to be sued when someone takes a booster during pregnancy and delivers as normal.

Which is often.

Nope
Emergency Use Authorization
No liability

They got full approval like six months ago. Keep up. Or better yet since you don't even care enough to keep on top of your information, just stay out of it.

Nope
Emergency Use Authorization
Don't be fooled by approval of non existing products
List date of Authorization and product name, or stay out of it

I'm not even kidding you, it was in all the papers. Happened in August. You would have to actively be ignoring all news about the vaccines not to know this.

Well if it was, it sounds like you could easily post a reference, but you can't, because it wasn't, and you know that.

I posted it below! Though it sorta looks like my Google machine is broken ;)

I don't use google but thanks. Here we go.......
"The US vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, only got extension of its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), not full approval!"
http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO30August2021.php
Clever Pharma! Get approval for a so called Covid-19 product that doesn't exist, and then announce the the 'Covid-19 vax got approval'
Nice little game of NYC Monty!

Nice work indeed. You posted that TWICE to the wrong comment.
Look at my post below again. There's a whole pile of links stating the same thing yours said.

Perhaps the Three Card Monty should be saved for someone else.

No, you're both banging the the pro vax drum.

By correcting anti and backing you up?
Did you LOOK at them? It's in plain English, how can this be so difficult to understand?

I didn't say I can't. I said the fact that you have actively been ignoring it AND STILL ARE because Google takes like twenty seconds means that you never actually cared in the first place.

I don't use google but thanks. Here we go.......
"The US vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, only got extension of its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), not full approval!"
http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO30August2021.php
Clever Pharma! Get approval for a so called Covid-19 product that doesn't exist, and then announce the the 'Covid-19 vax got approval'
Nice little game of NYC Monty!

I can see that! I can see that you do not make any effort to keep up with the current state of the vaccine science. That's actually the point I'm making in its entirety. Everyone else reading this can find that the exact vaccine you just cited got full approval about six months ago, from information that is slightly more up to date than the one you landed on.

Look, if you just don't care, then you don't care, that's fine. But the cost of not caring is that it then stands to reason you wouldn't know better than someone who does.

Legally distinct means two separate vaccines. If you find this confusing it is meant to be. Only under an EUA ruling is Pfizer presently exempt from vaccine liability. Some lawyers are calling the FDA ruse a classic “bait and switch” tactic, a form of fraud based on deception.

You haven't been keeping up with your information. Your information is six months out of date. And you're still typing for some reason.

All you have to do is read up on what's changed in the last six months.

The current state of 'vaccine technology' is experimental mRNA therapies from Moderna.
Help yourself to as many booster as you feel you need.

Said the person who had no idea that the emergency authorization ended six months ago.

.62 sec for me!

Your point was what again?

Is this like a pledge week prank thing lately, FULL CAP STOMP as your sole proof that the alternate reality you keep citing complete with demand that the ones you're claiming to counter look your non-existent sources for you which you didn't because you can't?

Took me five minutes to get past all the MSM and 'fact checkers', but here ya go!
"The US vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, only got extension of its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), not full approval!"
http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO30August2021.php
Clever Pharma! Get approval for a so called Covid-19 product that doesn't exist, and then announce the the 'Covid-19 vax got approval'
Nice little game of NYC Monty!

Oh, and for the record, both of yous are correct, only anti had outright dismissed what you said despite the fact that Emergency Use Authorization was the initial situation and only clarified the next day that they were fully approved August last year.

The screenshot I posted was for a list of articles regading Emergency Use Authorization, which anti seemed to had been denying when dismissing the situation but in actuality it was as in no longer current even though they had been prior...

Why would you need an obscure biased source when the original - incl the CDC, US Gov't, and Phizer itself for starters stated the same thing?
The truth has no sides.

Biases?
Yes, I trust my health to the Big Pharma folks who profit from my illness.
But anyway, when does the next booster come out?

Only the FDA approves vaccines, not the CDC, US Gov't, and Phizer

"Legally distinct means two separate vaccines. If you find this confusing it is meant to be. Only under an EUA ruling is Pfizer presently exempt from vaccine liability. Some lawyers are calling the FDA ruse a classic “bait and switch” tactic, a form of fraud based on deception."

Not the same thing

Shits not funny anymore, fella.

But really, what's the point? You're ARGUING against me for AGREEING WITH YOU.
Is this a new thing with the 'the your side,' and again, what's the point?

Can you stop replying, I'm get bored with this nonsense a lot?

Look, I have more patience for you because you're smart and you make the effort.

But the Pfizer vaccine received full authorization on August 21st. There was quite a bit of buzz about it. I remember that day very clearly.

It DOES continue to require Emergency Authorization for children under 16 AND YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE THAT IN YOUR SEARCH RESULTS IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY. But whybotherbear is making no such nuance. He flat out just didn't know that they got full authorization at all, and has been stating that they flat out have none at all. And the thing is, if he doesn't care enough to hear about the vaccine's authorization, he shouldn't get to say he knows more about it.