Abortion is a human right

And a microbe found on Mars is life...

I guess you are one of those confused people who believe men can get pregnant

Errm no

First of all, gigachad is fake, so your movement is fake lol (joke)

"Abortion is a human right." what an oxymoron. You are using a "human right" to kill another human being.

"Abortion is a human right." what an oxymoron. You are using a "human right" to kill another human being.

I guess self-defense is out the window too then smh...

HAHAHAHA. That is almost comedic.

Not only does self defense not always involve killing the aggressor (often just wounding them), but the baby is not the aggressor! The people who are trying to kill it are!

"Not only does self defense not always involve killing the aggressor..."

I'm gonna stop you right there. Killing in self defence doesn't always happen but it is a possibility and part of my point of refuting your flawed logic of killing never being necessary in self defence.

"baby is not the aggressor!.."

Nice strawman, proving you didn't either understand the premise or are coping with the fact that you know my logic is flawless. An abortion is necessary when:
*The mother's life is threnend
*The mother cannot support the child in their life
*The child will be born severely deformed and/or ill
*The mother was the victim of rape and the child will be a living trauma
*The mother is physically unable to bear a child without severe physical damage
And who can forget, *No woman has to bear a child that she does not want* Period. Point blank.

I literally never said killing wasn't part of self-defense. I said it doesn't always happen.

Or you are just wrong.

That's not what a strawman is. LOL

-The mother's life is never threatened. C section.

-The mother can get support from pregnancy centers, like save the storks, or give the child up for adoption, or anything of that sort. There is no reason why she is allowed to kill another human being.

-"Severely deformed or ill." One, you don't 100% know if that will happen, even if there is a great likelihood. If so, are we determining who gets to live based on their genetic superiority?

-The women will be in trauma whether or not they kill their child. Why should the child be punished for the crimes of her father? The circumstances of your birth should not determine your value.

-Same argument as before. If the women had consensual sex, that was her choice, and she cannot kill another human being, and shirk responsibility. In cases of rape, the child's value should not be determined by its circumstances of conception, otherwise, a baby born in a palace vs the slums create as class hierarchy.

"No neighbor should have to bear the presence of the other." idiot.

Bruh your entire rebuttal is taking all my points and just saying "no."

I'll say it again so that even with your apparent learning difficulties you can understand.

*No. woman. has. to. bear. a. child. that. she. does. not. want.*

Unless the baby is 6 months into development then abortion is a reasonable option. Make sense?

*Also Strawman definition:
A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one. Source: Wikipedia

No, it's actually countering you, with alternatives. What, am I jus supposed to agree?

Ha, adhominem!

Why doesn't she have to? YOU are just saying "no." Not me.

I noticed you didn't refute any of my arguments.

You don't have to agree, if that's your opinion then more power too you. It's a shit, illogical opinion that requires lots of mental gymnastics to give it the veneer of legitimacy, but an opinion nonetheless.

What a woman does with her body is none of your business so f**k off and stay f**ked off.

"You don't have to agree, if that's your opinion then more power too you. It's a shit, illogical opinion that requires lots of mental gymnastics to give it the veneer of legitimacy, but an opinion nonetheless."

I feel like you are literally saying your viewpoint right now.
Not only, again, DID YOU NOT ADRESS ANY OF MY ARGUMENTS AND USED AD HOMINEM ATTACKS INSTEAD, but killing an innocent baby is everyone's business.

"I feel like you are literally saying your viewpoint right now.
Not only, again, DID YOU NOT ADRESS ANY OF MY ARGUMENTS AND USED AD HOMINEM ATTACKS INSTEAD"

What else am I supposed to do when all of my points were discarded with strawman rebuttals? I may as well talk to a wall until I find the men in the white coats dragging me into the ambulance cause I'll get just as much intellectual stimulation without any of the accompanying stupidity causing me mentally stress talking to a dipshit like you.

"but killing an innocent baby is everyone's business."

It's not mine, I couldn't give less of a f**k what a woman does with her own body.

They weren't strawman rebuttals, they were pieces of logic that you don't like. Even if they were, just counter what I am saying. Have you ever taken a rhetoric class?

Again, you say "STRAWMAN!!! LOOK HOW HE ISN'T ARGUING PROPERLY!!!" Then use a fallacy, attacking me rather than the argument.

"her own body." Nope, not her own body. Do you know what embryology is? Embryology states that, from conception, the human being has come into existence. It is not her own body. The human being is separate, with its own DNA code unrepeatable in all history, has its own heart, lungs, etc. If the woman and the fetus are the same body, then do pregnant women have two heads? Two hearts? Two separate DNA codes? Because scientists haven't heard of that before!

And, no, it isn't.

LOL! Using men to make a point about an issue that's supposed to be about women! LOL!