The Inevitable March of Death for Those that Reject Life

You spelled *killing babies* wrong.
https://www.lifenews.com/2022/03/24/california-bill-would-allow-killing-babies-in-infanticide-up-to-28-days-after-birth/

But I'm going to steal this straw-man meme . . . good stuff. Ha! "stuff"! Get it?

I'm glad you enjoyed it. Go forth and strawman no more.

For the rest of y'all, here it is: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E0uHLwrWEAAbQrO.png

You know we're talking about literally killing people, don't you? Interesting how your sympathies side with the killers.

Go out and interview some adult women in your life -- maybe aunts, grandmas, church friends, coworkers . . . about 1 in 4 of them have had or will have an abortion. Remember that you care for them and think about their experiences and points of view on the subject rather than yelling "infanticide" at them.

That's not what we're talking about. Never has been. We're not talking about a baby in the womb, we're talking about a baby in your arms. Imagine you're holing Emma, from the sitcom "Friends". Now kill her. That's what we're talking about, not your strawman on abortion. Figures you'd project the accusation on me. You just did it because it's the only way you know how to argue and you wanted to keep me from seeing it - Ha! Busted strawman peddler.

As far as I can tell, you're arguing against the recent California law to eliminate out-of-pocket costs for abortion services. Seems pretty innocuous, but, you know, that's what's happening with abortion in California.

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2022/03/22/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-to-eliminate-out-of-pocket-costs-for-abortion-services/

No, that's SB 245. I'm talking about AB-2223. Here's the link again to the article.
https://www.lifenews.com/2022/03/24/california-bill-would-allow-killing-babies-in-infanticide-up-to-28-days-after-birth/

I checked it out, and that's a fantastically twisted and slanted take on a law that seems intended to prevent women from being punished if they have miscarriages or bad birth outcomes.

Here's the case that probably spurred the bill: https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/03/18/california-mothers-conviction-for-fetal-death-overturned/
. . . not an isolated case, either. Here is another, in OK: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/10/21/oklahoma-woman-convicted-of-manslaughter-miscarriage/6104281001/

Now tell me again how it's not about controlling and punishing women?

You need to take advice from your past-self. Don't strawman the argument.

Not punishing moms IS a way of protecting babies.