Imgflip Logo Icon

radical QnA

radical QnA | QNA
1984 "FREE SPEECH" VS ABSOLUTE FREESPEECH 
MANDATED ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL TO ABORT
TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS VS ECO-FASCISM
NUCLEAR ENERGY VS PRIMITIVENESS 
THEOCRACY VS USSR RELIGIOUS RULES (RELIGION BANNED) 
CENTRAL BANK VS NO BANK
EVERYONE CAN HAVE GUNS WITHOUT REGULATIONS VS ALL GUNS BANNED
POLICE STATE VS NO SECURITY 
IM CURIOUS AS TO HOW PPL RESPOND TO RADICAL QUESTIONS | image tagged in trollers font | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
140 views 4 upvotes Made by PLAYBOIFAMEZ 3 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
trollers font memeCaption this Meme
10 Comments
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
If I absolutely had to choose:
Absolute free speech
Illegal to abort
Technological progress
Nuclear energy (both options suck tho)
Bothe options are equally intolerable, can’t give an answer
No bank
Everyone can have guns without regulations
No security
1 up, 3y
Damn same except with the 2nd one the 5th one
0 ups, 3y
absolute free speech
illegal to abort
technological progress
nuclear energy (hell yes)
theocracy
everyone can have guns without regulations
police state
0 ups, 3y
absolute free speech
illegal to abort
technological progress
nuclear energy
theocracy
no bank
All guns and military equipment legal
no security
0 ups, 3y
absolute free speech
illegal to abort
technological progress
nuclear energy
theocracy (Christian, but not catholic)
no bank
everyone can have guns
no security
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
hardest choice thanos | image tagged in hardest choice thanos | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
*holds nose & takes deep breath*

Absolute free speech — Better to have wackos spouting off hate speech than the state sanctioning the only version of reality. American society is closer to absolute free speech, Russian society is closer to 1984 — I think it’s obvious which one’s better.

Illegal to abort — Mandated abortions would actually be an even greater invasion of the Roe v. Wade right-to-privacy.

Technological progress — This one isn’t even radical, lol, so okay.

Nuclear energy — Nuclear power is actually safe if done right. Nuclear weapons though, major mistake to have created them. The fact the whole world has to wonder if it’s going to be fried instantly over Russia & Ukraine’s war is absurd. If I had to choose, I’d say no nuclear tech at all and we get our power needs some other way.

USSR religious rules — No religion would be a free speech nightmare, but it’s still worse to have a theocracy with government controlled by one religion trying to convert or kill everyone else. (Actually, religions were still able to practice under the table in the USSR, as long as they didn’t organize a political opposition)

Central bank — It’s actually not radical, every modern country has one.

All guns banned — If you could actually do it, and take the guns away from criminals too, society would be safer overall.

Police state — Horrible option, but anarchy would be worse.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Taking guns from the police too?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
https://www.minnpost.com/community-voices/2021/05/what-america-can-learn-from-south-koreas-model-of-gun-regulation/

Regular cops in South Korea aren’t equipped with guns, and yet, it hasn’t made South Korea a lawless dystopia.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I understand that
How about the military and politicians will they get guns?
0 ups, 3y
Military yes. Politicians no. I take it to mean banning only civilian guns.

But if it means taking military guns away too, I’d change my answer.
trollers font memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
QNA 1984 "FREE SPEECH" VS ABSOLUTE FREESPEECH MANDATED ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL TO ABORT TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS VS ECO-FASCISM NUCLEAR ENERGY VS PRIMITIVENESS THEOCRACY VS USSR RELIGIOUS RULES (RELIGION BANNED) CENTRAL BANK VS NO BANK EVERYONE CAN HAVE GUNS WITHOUT REGULATIONS VS ALL GUNS BANNED POLICE STATE VS NO SECURITY IM CURIOUS AS TO HOW PPL RESPOND TO RADICAL QUESTIONS