I'm pretty sure anyone can introduce a bill to Congress. So you can take it to Congress yourself. But this isn't going to pass.
I'm the most pro assassination guy on the stream, hell I own Pepes Guns and Liquor, the streams official gunshop and would have everything to gain from increased demand for firearms. And I'd still vote no, because last time we had assassinations it was a disaster.

What exactly do you have to lose with this? Obviously, your Pepes Ground Pounders (also i have a question: how do you pronounce Pepe?) will be involved in some sort of military one way or another, this would mean more business for you.

I have nothing to lose. More weapons sales, more violence and more chaos for the Ground Pounders to clean up.
But my constituents are interested in a peaceful stream, and last time we did assassinations it was a mess.

And it's pepe as in pepé le pew

I’m always a nay on assassinations

Are we trying to roleplay a democracy or the start of WWI

D i p l o m a c y

lol nay

Not in Congress anymore, so this is just my opinion, but NO, it never ends well for anybody

Scratch my old vote, aye.

Nay. The whole assassinations thing never goes well, I think bringing it back will just cause more drama.

It would definitley spice things up and give military defenses and police departments more use. And scar would make sure that the word wouldnt be an easy word.

My vote is still nay

No frikin way

imagine trying to keep track of that confusing shit

scar would be the one keeping track.

Yeah, as if Scar doesn't have enough to do

thanks XD

but, if we were to do it, it'd be pretty easy, I could just keep an unfeatured image and post screenshots of the part where we decide on a word

so, that parts fine, just judge it based on the idea itself, it'd be pretty easy to implement

However, in practice...

Yes, there may be some sort of restriction on how easy it is to try
but, that's what these discussions are about. As long as it's not too easy to exploit, I'm fine with it. But if it doesn't pass that's fine with me too.

all he has to do is keep track of one word. he can write it down or comment it on a private image.

So i think the best way to explain this is to give an example of what it would look like.

Let's say we have this user named bob. Bob wants to assassinate Incognito Guy. He tells you a certain word that he has to get Incognito Guy to say. It can't be a simple word it has to be a somewhat bigger complicated word. Like banana or spanish. If Bob manages to get Incognito Guy to say this word he will show you proof he did, and Incognito Guy will be assassinated and unable to finish his term, and his VP becomes president. But Bob has to tell you the word BEFORE he gets Incognito Guy to say it, and Incognito Guy would have to say the word to Bob.

lol wut

Assassination rules. I need congress to vote on this to make assassinations possible.

Haha no

This is confusing, lol.

if someone wants to assassinate someone, they tell scar a certain word and try to get the person they are assassinating to say it. if the person says it, they are assassinated.

nay

Memechat me

ok i followed you

Nay

Confusion, with all due respect, i respect your opinion but if this bill is passed, there will be a lot more work for the IPPD. This would mean more publicity for you.

It's true, but if assassinations are to come back, they should come back the old way.

what was the old way?

You could just assassinate somebody.

And then they'd be gone for 24 hours

that would be chaos. everyone could die all within a day. this makes it more complicated for someone to assassinate someone and for people to narrow it down and figure out who did it and check with scar if they got the answer right. like playing a game of clue.

But it would only be 24 hours

well we could apply that rule, but with the system i came up with, you can only assassinate a government official not some random person. that government official would just be a normal citizen for the rest of the term. we could apply the same system for citizens and apply the 24 hour rule

Ok