In the past we have seen certain users spam this unrelated NSFW content just to stir up drama. It's time to put this to rest.

nah n**ga

You want to see more of those spammy unrelated kissing images?

yessir

Nay.

Are we really doing this again? Kissing is G-rated. If it can be shown to 3-year-olds then it is suitable content for the 13+ userbase of Imgflip. Kissing is certainly more suitable content for young people than “God hates f*gs” type memes and over-the-top mudslinging and a lot of other crap I’ve seen posted here, much of it by yourself.

Is it “unrelated”? Not necessarily. Any kind of image could be relevant with creative captioning and Congressional proposals like yours ironically strengthen the argument that it is, in fact, relevant, period. Otherwise, why vote on it?

It can’t be enforced anyway. Scar won’t allow it because it restricts free speech too much. And if you try to anyway, you’ll lose your mod again. We’ve been down this road before, man! Need I remind you the definition of insanity — doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

Nay

Aye

I'm not a fan of regulating speech. If an image violates the TOS isn't that enough cause to remove it? Nay

It does violate the TOS when it's spam:

imgflip.com/i/5rlygx?nerp=1635131108#com15056662
https://imgflip.com/i/5trc0a
https://imgflip.com/i/5wedgn?nerp=1638503278#com15847446
https://imgflip.com/i/5vua18?nerp=1638503354#com15762131
https://imgflip.com/i/5vua18?nerp=1638503354#com15762177
https://imgflip.com/i/5zs6q0?nerp=1641292772#com16441141
https://imgflip.com/i/5fjtfn?nerp=1641292872
https://imgflip.com/i/5vggxr?nerp=1641292816
https://imgflip.com/i/5xo2q7#com16051300
https://imgflip.com/i/5xnuvi#com16050447
https://imgflip.com/i/5xnwtw?nerp=1641293493#com16057957

I need more reasoning why this bill should pass beyond "we don't like this".

It's become a real problem how much this content gets spammed, and it's happening because we have no clear rules against it. The site mods make the rules, and since it's a site mod doing the spamming it's up to us whether we let the young kids on this site see kissing images that are completely unrelated to this stream.

And that's another problem; it has nothing to do with IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS.

If one member is doing something that's unacceptable, why not go to that member and discuss it privately. Do we need to enact a law that will affect everyone for the sake of one member? I might be supportive if it were more than just kissing.

Because I already have, and he has only persisted and done it with the intention of stirring up toxicity and conflict in this community.

Nay

It is a violation of the CSC, Article 14, Section 1. Any attempts to try and illegitimately override this will result in another impeachment trial against you. Congressman Product votes NAY.

Incorrect. This does not prohibit the free exercise of speech, the press, peaceful assembly, or protest. This is a bill to categorise certain images as NSFW, which is not censorship. This is also a bill to remove spam (which violates the TOS) as well as comments that are unrelated to the stream. This is perfectly in line with your constitution and this is not an impeachable offence. I do, however, still intend to hold a trial against you for misuse of power (abusing power to delete comments for no reason while harassing other users with spam).

Uh huh, and how well has that worked for you in the past? You’ve already lost your modship on here three times over this exact issue, do you really want to go for four?

Don't bother trying to bully me into doing what you want. Now eat your peas.

Abstain

Aye

Abstain

Abstain

Nay

I'm just as against this as you but no
That's not free speech if someone can't post random shit

They still can but the images will just be marked NSFW. That's categorisation not censorship.

Comments containing it will be deleted

If you don't support that you could just vote aye on marking the images NSFW and nay on deleting the comments.

Abstain

This already was put to rest smh

If you pass this you're just gonna lose your mod again.
I'd show you what section of the constitution this violates, but I don't want you to feel stoopid for being unable to read it.
[Side bar: yes, I'm aware you're just PRETENDING to be too stupid to read the constitution. Yes I'm aware you already read it.]