Blue vs Red

Personal experience

And I wouldn't call it "obsessed" - I'd call it "violently passionate"

I've presented the research to you before, and you ignored it then - I have a feeling that you're personally invested in disputing it.

"Personally invested"
no doubt

Wait...hold on a second here - are you trying to defend grooming as somehow harmless?

Somebody didn't read the publications....

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

...and I quote "Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation."

Let me shorten the statistics for you:
Molested by men: 46% of homosexual men, 7% of heterosexual men.
Molested by women: 22% of homosexual women, 1% of heterosexual women.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/

...and I quote "This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually."

Perhaps you can't really read, and you're using a screen reader to do the hard part for you...

"makes" someone gay - no, it doesn't say that - it provides evidence to that hypothesis. There is an undeniable correlation.....undeniable for anyone capable of objective thought, or those of us with no predilections to protect.

And the second paper ... the statistics IN THE PAPER show that they do .... that they are MUCH more likely to offend. I suspect the second sentence was inserted so pedos would have something to argue about, or perhaps to shield them from litigation.

I'd have to find it again, but the research I found has 2% of the population committing more than 60% of the child molestation.....something like that. The distribution was wildly disproportionate....I mean - it was clown-car ridiculous.

I'll give you one guess what segment of the population was represented in that 2%...

Psychology isn't an exact science - it's more interpretive, which is probably why the paper provides the caveat.

Oh, I'm sure you're going to reference something from the SPLC as being the only credible source of information, or some other equally far left source. I'm wasting my time on you.

https://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/

I was mistaken - the 2% commit 40% of the crime. Still wildly disproportionate.

and to my assertion - grooming produces homosexuality

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/

and in case you want another from an official source showing homosexuals are more likely to molest, here's another

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/

It means they don't try to take pride in it.

and list some animals with gay activity.

SOme do but really they don't mean it And wikipedia anyone can change it. And my calves do Sometimes do some things to each other but it is because they are looking for milk. and grown cows will mount each other because of hormones. But even if animals do it does that mean it's okay for humans to be animals?

And how come you never hear about or see transgender animals.

[image deleted] Maybe they do but if they actually were gay than the whole species would die off. oh and I would like to thank you for this.

But no one else has ever flagged me you have done it 7 times and it was not even offensive. saying mormon is offensive because it is a slang term.

You do not know who flagged you. I found out on a user created stream that someone I tend to agree and get along with flagged two of my memes there and for bogus reasons too.
Fact is, those who accuse tend to be giving it away that they're doing it to whom they blame.