Democrats/Progressives/Liberals have pushed science back into the Dark Ages.

I wonder- is your "full time job" a moderator for this website?

Says the "adult" who plays with children's toys.

And evolution didn't happen.

Lol MI for sure

"I bet you also believe what the Bible says about the earth having pillars and how it never moves"

Your thought process is truly painful to observe. Do you have constant headaches? Serious question.

Do you know what figures of speech are? They are used constantly in literature of all forms.
Do you know what poetic license is, and why it is used?

Do you level the same useless argument against the local weather-person when they claim that the sun circles the Earth vs the Earth spinning on its axis? They daily tell us when sunrise and sunset will happen. Or is there such a thing as anthropocentric modes of speech and writing- another literal tool.

*The Bible informed us that there were canyons under the seas, long before SONAR was invented.
*The Bible told us that the Universe was expanding before red shift was discovered.
*The Bible taught ancient Israel about sanitation, long before germs were seen for the first time under a microscope.
*The Bible protected those who paid attention to it from catching infestations found in their homes. (Yes, I saw your nonsense use of that portion, and the good response that was given.)
*The Bible explained the water cycle, long before scientists figured it out.
*Etc.

When the Bible says,
For you will go out with joy And be led forth with peace; The mountains and the hills will break forth into shouts of joy before you, And all the trees of the field will clap their hands. Isaiah 55:12

- do you for a moment believe that the readers, both then and now, are supposed to take that literally?

If you read more than just MLP comic books, I think you would find that there are all sorts of literary devices that can be used to communicate important information in a meaningful and memorable fashion. To not understand this is to bring an a priori, and anti-intellectual, bias to any book one reads.

"I'm just curious, in the past 50 years, how many Nobel prizes have been won by creationists who think the God of the Bible created the universe in six literal days?"

This is not how we determine what is true vs what is false. Human committees with clear biases deciding on who even gets to be considered for a Nobel is hardly a basis for determining anything is true.

Barack Hussein 0bama (hmmmm hmmmm hmmmm) was awarded the Nobel Prize, essentially just for being black. He certainly had not been president long enough to do anything, good or bad, that would have been notable enough to gain the attention of the Nobel Committee.
They long ago turned the Nobel into being a Participation Trophy for those who tow the narrative. Which is not to say that many people that have received one didn't genuinely deserve it.

I think it annoying that you thought it worthy of doing a happy dance over my use of the Paluxy River tracks simply because AiG thought it not really useful. They are entitled to their opinion, and I would have agreed with it before even reading it- nothing is sufficient as a standalone when dealing with complex issues.

However, in this instance, you are using what has to be one of the worst appeals to authority that I have seen in some time. The Nobel Committee is not there to inform us what is right or wrong in this matter, so using them as support for your point is impossible.

But I do wonder how many creation scientists were awarded the Nobel for their work in general. We know that those who blazed the way into the scientific method were often Christians, or at least identified as such. "Guilt by association" is not a good method of proving anything like this.