Imgflip Logo Icon

The judge said "While we make mistakes it does not make us irredeemable. Good luck to you sir."

The judge said "While we make mistakes it does not make us irredeemable. Good luck to you sir." | MAR-A-LAGO MARTYR OF THE DAY ROBERT PALMER; THEN: HE ASSAULTED COPS THREE DIFFERENT WAYS. NOW: THE JUDGE DROPPED SEVEN CHARGES AND SENTENCED HIM TO 63-MONTHS IN JAIL FOR ONE CHARGE OF ASSAULT, SAYING "IT HAS TO BE MADE CLEAR THAT TRYING TO VIOLENTLY OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT, IS GOING TO BE MET WITH ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN PUNISHMENT." | image tagged in politics | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
171 views • 5 upvotes • Made by LarryCaird 4 years ago in politics
politics
14 Comments
flman2020
0 ups, 4y
Let's totally condemn the 100s on politically motivated riots surrounding the election, including the 1 republican riot.
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
ONE WAS A TOOL OF THE STATE ONE'S A TOOL OF THE STATE THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Lyoll
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Support Law and Order?
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Of course I do.
These trials have very little to do with law and order and more to do with vengeance.
The Left couldn't do shit about Trump, so they are punishing his supporters.
Lyoll
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
So, a man assaults cops and you see the trial as "vengeance", not law? Sounds like you are embracing all the attitudes I've heard right wingers project onto BLM.
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Name some BLM thugs that have been prosecuted.
Lyoll
1 up, 4y
Here's your rebuttal: https://apnews.com/article/records-rebut-claims-jan-6-rioters-55adf4d46aff57b91af2fdd3345dace8
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What I take issue with is the “violent overthrow” hyperbole.
Lyoll
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
They were violent (QED by Mr. Palmer above) and they sought the overthrow of our electoral system.
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No. That would be the Democrats when they changed the rules in the middle of the election, silly.

And your Palmer didn’t prove anything
Lyoll
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
By "changed the rules" you mean more mail-in and absentee ballots? If you think that's wrong, you weren't paying attention to the larger context of 2020. Adapting to let everyone vote is PRESERVING our electoral system, not attacking it.
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Not
Even
Close
LarryCaird
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The Supreme Court, which has a Republican majority, several appointed by Trump disagrees with you. States that used optional means of voting that were already "on the books," and legal under their laws is not changing the rules. It is adapting to meet the challenges faced by citizens trying to exercise their Constitutional right to vote. Some 50-lawsuits alleging what you do were heard by various judges, many of them Trump appointees. Not one of them supported your position. Just because your guy lost, bigly, does not mean that all the states you wanted him to win cheated. It just means he lost. Period.
merryprankster
0 ups, 4y
I disagree.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
MAR-A-LAGO MARTYR OF THE DAY ROBERT PALMER; THEN: HE ASSAULTED COPS THREE DIFFERENT WAYS. NOW: THE JUDGE DROPPED SEVEN CHARGES AND SENTENCED HIM TO 63-MONTHS IN JAIL FOR ONE CHARGE OF ASSAULT, SAYING "IT HAS TO BE MADE CLEAR THAT TRYING TO VIOLENTLY OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT, IS GOING TO BE MET WITH ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN PUNISHMENT."