If he was a dictator, he would disapprove images that made fun of him, but he approved everything

He tried unsuccessfully several times to unfeature his political opponent's memes. He just did so by marking them unnecessary NSFW and then attempting to limit NSFW memes.
In fact, he lost his mod not once, but 3 TIMES for unfeaturing his opponents comments and memes under the guise that they were "offensive."

yeah

but I am just saying it could have been worse, and this was flared up originally because of the Pepe IRA meme posted. If that didn't happen then things could have went swimmingly fine for a long time and we would have been peaceful

But no. That happened which IG didn't like and he was polite at first, but the poster didn't care and posted more (somehow people were harassing Octavia over found information but posting stuff that someone told someone else to stop and they aren't isn't, nice logic), Andrew posted it, IG just got mad at that point, RUP breaks up, LA alliance wins but the victory cost was a less active stream in politics and a more MSMG style way (which by the way, apparently if you are neutral to IG, that makes you a not that good person because he is breathing right now and that is hurting feelings with different opinions). So in other words, if the IRA meme wasn't posted again after IG wasn't cool with it, then he wouldn't be as bad, because people respected what he thought and then he would respect what they thought back

Translated into English: Incognito's a good guy! YOU MADE him try to censor gays and other political opponents by posting memes he didn't like!
If people hadn't posted things he didn't like he wouldn't have had to censor them!
That's called blaming the victim, Wubbzy.

But regardless, that’s not a good take. Just because he didn’t out right disapprove images that were critical of him, doesn’t mean he’s not tyrannical or authoritarian.

You have any idea how retarded that sounds?

Alright then, how am I “tyrannical”. What have a done that has been overstepping my power?

When you interfered with Congress to prevent RichardChill24 being impeached for repeatedly harassing a British user with images supporting a designated terrorist group. (which you admitted to doing because he was your friend). You can say you did that because we did the process wrong, but you waited until the most inconvenient time to tell us that, and told me to do the entire process again. And even when I complied, you still blocked the impeachment, meaning you intentionally put us all on a wild goose chase knowing you'd use your power as stream owner to waste time and obstruct Congress' democratic process.

How am I tyrannical as president, you can criticize my presidency be whining about decisions I made that you didn’t like months back. I’ve already told you why all that happened the way it did.

You asked "What have a done that has been overstepping my power?" and now you're asking a completely different question (yet another example of you wasting people's time).

And you get mad at Andrew for intentionally misinterpreting things lol, you knew what I meant.

You never specified so I genuinely believed you were just asking about your general time in power. The reason I never thought you were asking about your Presidency is because it doesn't really matter. You've already proven that when you get power you become a tyrannical, totalitarian, autocratic, dictator.

And the fact that he refused to post his mod logs speaks for itself.

Didn't need to because y'all took screenshots of them for me. And the funniest part is OP's screenshot of my mod logs included a mod showing me disapproving my own image because I made a spelling mistake as if that was some terrible crime 😂

They screenshotted the whole logs, so some stuff that wasn’t related was bound to be mixed in. What are you on about?

lol the entire mod log was freaking unrelated

I think the part where you censor your opponents can be “classified” as related ;)

Based IG

He has a record of tagging images with NSFW, which is how he disguises it.

Marking images NSFW is categorisation, not censorship.

“Categorization” is a real nice way of putting “censoring those you disagree with, specifically members of the LGBTQ”. No reason to lie, we’ve all seen your history.

How is marking NSFW images NSFW censorship? Most folks turn NSFW on anyway. But those who don't want to see NSFW images won't want to see a zillion images of gay kissing.

If most turn on NSFW anyway then why make NSFW laws? That logic doesn’t make any sense. Let’s not forget the fact that you made the WORD “bisexual” NSFW.

Because unlike you I care about those who don't turn NSFW on. You're not exactly a very good president if you don't look out for everyone.

Oh yeah, you’re sure “protecting” everyone by redirecting freedom of speech. You can’t write this stuff, you sound like an oppressive ruler from a fictional story.

Restricting*

Anyway, imma head out for the night. Have fun “protecting” the stream!

You say that and always come back a few minutes later.

Yknow how you avoid “gay kissing”? You ignore it, like any sane person who didn’t want to see that would do, not fricking write laws making that NSFW, and restricting the amount of NSFW images you can post per day. Therefore limiting the amount of posts an LGBTQ person could post per day, by the AUP definition of NSFW.

I never supported restricting the amount of NSFW images you can post per day, and I even voted in favour of repealing that law. No one was ever never limiting the amount of posts an LGBTQABCXYZPPP123+-x÷ person could post per day.