Biden didn't get hardly any votes. 80 Million my *beep*

Counted twice. Three times in some states. Only 74 million. Biden won.

Yep. Mhmmm.

Yeah but what about the millions of trump votes that weren’t counted? There is no way that DUMBocrat got more than 50 million. No way in heck

See, you say that, but we counted twice. Three times in some states. Biden got a LOT more than 50 million.

You need to read the audits. They show that Trump won.

Like I said, No way. We know he cheated because everyone in office was democratic. That is only one of the trillions of reasons why Biden cheated. I could go on for hours, but you won't listen, so im not even going to bother

And like I said, we counted twice. Three times in some states. So very much way.

And if you counted wrong?

That's what counting twice, three times in some states was to check for.

And if you counted wrong twice? Or three times?

Then the numbers would mismatch. If the counts agree with each other, then you were right the first time.

And (just saying) if the counts were wrong the whole time?

Then the numbers would disagree with each other. If the counts agree with each other, then you were right the first time.

They weren't counted wrong.
Half of them were throwen away. Thats why you can count them 1000 times and still get like 80 million for biden and like 2 for Trump. You clearly cheat a lot, obviously.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9c states that you need to state WITH SPECIFICITY the exact circumstances in which the votes were thrown away. That means you need to explain EXACTLY when this was done on which votes and how. And how you intend to prove it. This is what was missing in the 70 lawsuits, and 70 times the case was thrown out. It is not enough to say "but the votes were thrown out, we think" - that's too general.

Your count wrong 100 times becuse your not counting, your just saying what you want to hear. This is why you can't trust Liberals

There most definitely was confirmed footage of people doing some counting.

They weren't counted wrong.
Half of them were throwen away. Thats why you can count them 1000 times and still get like 80 million for biden and like 2 for Trump. You clearly cheat a lot, obviously.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9c states that you need to state WITH SPECIFICITY the exact circumstances in which the votes were thrown away. That means you need to explain EXACTLY when this was done on which votes and how. And how you intend to prove it. This is what was missing in the 70 lawsuits, and 70 times the case was thrown out. It is not enough to say "but the votes were thrown out, we think" - that's too general.

You seem to have misunderstood my question. Please reread it.

Done.

The answer is that the numbers would disagree with each other. If the counts agree with each other, then you were right the first time.

And if the numbers themselves were inaccurate? The actual"counts"?

Which part of this is confusing you? If you counted three times, and all three times you got to the same number, you were accurate the first time.

I don't know if you ever took a law class but "it's super obvious" doesn't actually count as an argument in court.

See, that's not the argument I am making.

Well, when you decide to get round to the argument you ARE making, the text box will be ready.

He doesn't listen to evidence worth the crap. I agree with you, 100%.

I know :D...

I could say the same thing to you... If the numbers that you were looking at were wrong, then no amount of counting will reveal any discrepancies. That's what other sources are for.

Well, it will, because if you count it correctly the second or third time, you'll get to a different number that doesn't match the first time.

*sigh*
No, it actually won't. What I am saying is that even if your "counts" matched, there can still be huge anomalies. And blatant cheating.

Well, no, because if they match then by definition that's not an anomaly. That's what anomaly means.

As for allegations of cheating, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9c states that you need to state WITH SPECIFICITY the exact circumstances in which fraud has taken place. That means you need to explain EXACTLY who was systematically altering the count and how. Whose signature is on the altered counts? Which counters were employed? Where did this happen? This is what was missing in the 70 lawsuits, and 70 times the case was thrown out. It is not enough to say "but the numbers may have been altered maybe by dirty rotten cheaters" - that's too general, and does not follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In other words, we counted twice. Three times in some states. Biden won.

-Ballot dumps backdated to Nov. 3
-Dominion Voting machines changing Trump voted to Biden
-According to Pennsylvania state law, mail in ballots must be specifically requested with a valid reason for doing so. However in this election they were mailed out on mass to every address especially in heavily Democrat areas
-Covering of windows in Philadelphia ballot counting centers
-Circumstantial evidence, such as the stopping of the count at 3:00 in the morning and the violation of Benford's Law

And much more.

But at this point you will label me a "right-wing conspiracy theorist" and dismiss any argument I make.

In other words, your "counting twice" was still inaccurate.

*en masse. My autocorrect is out of date.

*votes, not voted

None of which you could prove and the courts threw your case out 70 times. Not one ballot - not a single one - was ruled fraudulent. The count stands as accurate and was checked twice. Three times in some states. Biden won.

You know, I counted 90,ooo,ooo myself, yup, TWICE!

There's always cybernetic ninjas awaiting with special bamboo sniffing capabilities to throw egg on the face of the doinks that hired them,,,

You're 5 days late to your own party, so laterzzzzz,,,

your 5 minutes late to read my comment. Soooooo jinx now you cant talk!