I'm sorry, but it's true.

Yeahhhh, that's looking pretty hairy there. Opens the door to a whole lot of theological arguing, with in the end probably isn't going to help anything or anyone. Sloth needs to focus on the mod abuse and not make this about IG's proclaimed religion.

I’m developing facts — I’m not attacking anybody’s religion. I’m not anti-Christian in the slightest.

However, there is a significant chance that professed religious beliefs are where the mod abuse is coming from, and the reason for all the stubbornness.

If that’s the case, I can’t avoid the topic.

What difference does it make whether or not his religion is the reason he's censoring stuff?

That’s for anyone judging his case to decide.

It makes no difference, there's your answer

For some it might matter, for others it might not. The jury has a right to hear the evidence either way.

Your non-response has been noted

You liked that one, huh? :)

Not particularly, I just so enjoy ironically throwing things back in people's faces

I also think he's wrong to ask Pollard a question about RUP policy that he's not equipped to answer.

It did seem pretty overboard

I've gotta applaud Pollard for answering so many questions. It must be very intimidating. sloth is really pushing it here.

I'm sweating a lot. That's all I can say.

Dude, you're amazing at what you're doing. It's great that you can handle situations like this, I'm so glad you could fit in these hard situations, and stand your ground when you thought that a question was out of topic and non-related. Keep it up.

Thanks m8

I must say you're doing a great job. sloth's tactics are disgusting. I know I'm not supposed to influence your answers, but please don't answer the question about the RUP's policy because you're not equipped to answer that so it's not fair.

…IG, lets try keep this civil. I can tell you're upset, but please don't let this get the better of you. I will say the same thing to sloth if he describes you in an unsavoury manner.
Also, isn't Pollard the RUP's Head Of Congress candidate? He's on the ticket for the party, and he represents it. He should be able to answer questions relating to the party he's running in, shouldn't he?

I am the RUP owner not Pollard. Plus the RUP is a big tent party and there's a lot of different opinions.

Shouldn't everyone be able to speak for their party? Not accusing, just genuinely curious

"But if the RUP is a big, tent, catch all party, then shouldn't they at least agree on some things? If its just IG's beliefs, then is it a real catch all party?"

The thing that unites us is the fact that we're right-of-centre (or at least non-leftist, although we do also accept apolitical users as they're pro-RUP).

Oh, okay then. I was confused for a second there, thanks for explaining

*as long as they're

We're a big party so one member can't speak for all of us.

oh okay then

Nope. Me and IG have similar ideologies, yet I’ve opposed him in some areas. We may be in the same party, but we don’t always agree with each other.

But if the RUP is a big, tent, catch all party, then shouldn't they at least agree on some things? If its just IG's beliefs, then is it a real catch all party?

Both lgbtq and religion is irrelevant to ip, to inject one and suppress the other while claiming free speech is contradictory. They can be or are an aspect or influence of/on your personality. You can express them but when you enforce your personal influence on others, it is beyond simple expression.

But I guess not 🤷‍♂️

Pretty much* meme correct

hey lardar, i have something to talk abt, memechat? (im already following you)

Well, yeah, sure.