Does your Constitution have a 25th-Amendment like procedure for removing an official who’s collectively judged by the rest of his Party to be totally out of his senses?
If not, it should!
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
No, and it shouldn't.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Plus the impeachment trial isn't even that damaging to us. Quit trying to scare the RUP into a civil war, sloth.
Well actually yes. I had a nice party with me, pr1ce and other parties, but then everyone went to Rup that IG made so I went along since I was the only person left
RUP has one last-ditch option remaining to avoid a damaging impeachment trial of IG. With support from other RUP members, Pr1ce can invoke his reserve authority as President to declare IG a rogue RUP member who no longer represents the Party’s values — and consent to allowing the Owners to sack him now. Is that unconstitutional? Perhaps, but so is what IG is doing.