science is a mental disorder

https://www.sorryantivaxxer.com/post/renee-johnson-33-paintsville-ky-clerk-at-cash-express-anti-vaxx-dead-from-covid

Cash Express lost a good one...

Nice pic of you

Triggered?

by you? LOL

So you keep saying

First time I have EVER said that, Skeezix.
You just absolutely can't help but lie about everything, can you, boy?

you've denied being triggered by me before.

Ohhhhh, so you the one who is being triggered.
Got it. Now that makes more sense.

so you keep saying.

Might take a while for the average to reach yours... mid 70's?

That would be the average Red State.

Your own study just proved my point cuz you didn't read the word "false".

''DanLewellen 9 ups, <1h

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/politiqs/
"Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average. "

What's that about Republicans having lower IQs?''

This is so sad, you were being serious?
Did you read the rest of the fake joke article?

No, actually I didn't read the entirety of it, which is why I deleted my comment

now you know how stupid conservatism can make somebody.

Oh? Well allow me to assist for the sake of our esteemed reading audience:

"A new study conducted at Harvard University shows that in America, Liberals have a significantly lower IQ than Conservatives. The study was conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the last twelve years, and has concluded its results.
The first part of the study lists the correlation between political beliefs and intelligence. Subjects of the study were chosen at random and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some questions for a reasonable amount of money.

Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average. However, the conservatives did not score the highest. The holder of second place were Communists with an average I.Q of 115, and the first place was apolitical people who did not follow any specific doctrine, who received a whopping score on average of 135.

While Blogster republished the majority of the satirical IAHYM News Network article, the site failed to include the disclaimer that was included at the bottom of the original version:

Oh yeah, and everything in that bullsh*t you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."

The difference between you and me is I'll admit when I'm wrong, you on the other hand revert to projecting and insults.

"DanLewellen

Might take a while for the average to reach yours... mid 70's?"

''DanLewellen

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/politiqs/
"Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average. "

You entered this with an albeit lame misfired attempt at an insult backed by a clumsy use of a cherry picked segment out of an outrageously overt and illogical (ie, Marxsists, 89; Communsts, 115) goofy hoax to back it.
Now that you got enough egg on your face to last your tenure here (you shall hneceforth be known as Hi! IQ Dan), you're crying about it?

Your name sounds familiar, where you one of those gnats that tried to jump out from behind someone's leg recently to lob one at lil' ol' me recently?

For future ref:
If it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, THEN it ain't a low IQ Conservative who thinks the National Enquirer is real news.

Yeah, I insulted the op. It was all in good fun. I don't normally insult argue unless provoked. I believe the op could've handled themselves in that aspect.
I didn't cherry pick anything. But yes it was a mistake, which I deleted.
Now for future reference, here is an insult which isn't jokingly written-
You are a mistake that your mom should've deleted, and somewhere there is a tree that is tirelessly producing oxygen for you. You need to find them and apologize.

Golly, I feel so ashamed.

Perhaps as an act of contrition said tree can be transplanted to where it is more direly needed, such as in the confines of a certain someone's lower digestive tract where a certain IQ of 110 producing nodule of oxygen deprived detritus can benefit, say, when it comes to gathering some Earth shattering facts from The Onion.

Isn't it rather dangerous to use the entirety of your vocabulary in one sentence?

Little slow on the uptake, huh, IQ110 who thought a hoax article complete with a disclaimer calling anyone who believes it to be vaild an idiot?

Again, here it is:

"Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average. However, the conservatives did not score the highest. The holder of second place were Communists with an average I.Q of 115, and the first place was apolitical people who did not follow any specific doctrine, who received a whopping score on average of 135."

The "135" I referred to that r/whooshed your noggin like it was still safely esconced up that rectal cavity is from the last line, or must I provide the assistance of a GPS to find that for you too?

gaagh, I'm all out of things to say.

Oh, wait, according to your article, I'm clocking in at at least 135!

135? Please... you would struggle to pour water our of a boot with the instructions on the heel.

This is what DanLewellen posted:

"Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average."

This is the entire paragraph from which he selected that segment:

"Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average. However, the conservatives did not score the highest. The holder of second place were Communists with an average I.Q of 115, and the first place was apolitical people who did not follow any specific doctrine, who received a whopping score on average of 135."

Note what is said about Communists and the apolitical, which somehow Dan managed to stop reading before he got to it.

He also failed to read the disclaimer that was noted from the original version:

"Oh yeah, and everything in that bullsh*t you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."

Conclusion, conservatives spread and referred to this story.... because - wait for it -

they

are

low

IQ

idiots

.....

who

can't

read

an

enitire

paragraph.