Imgflip Logo Icon

Project Veritas, cause where else are you going to get the truth?

Project Veritas, cause where else are you going to get the truth? | PROJECT VERITAS REPORTS THAT AEGIS LIVING KILLED A WOMAN IN THEIR CARE. PARADOX3713; THEY DRUGGED HER, INJECTED HER WITH THE COVID VACCINE WITHOUT CONSENT, AND IT KILLED HER. | image tagged in memes,politics,coronavirus,vaccines,murder,joe biden | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
732 views 29 upvotes Made by Paradox3713 3 years ago in politics
21 Comments
4 ups, 3y
Blankie the Shocked Dog | WTF HAS THIS WORLD COME TOO | image tagged in blankie the shocked dog | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Project Veritas reports a lot of things that aren't true.
7 ups, 3y,
1 reply
"Lots of thing"? You are going to have to provide supporting materials to your claim, cause the only thing they have been confirmed of doing is trespassing. MSM tried to claim deceptive editing, which no one believes, but none of that was proven to be not true and that is coming from outlets who have literally been proven to create fake stories..

Looking forward to seeing what you have to back your claim. Be forewarned, I wouldn't use anything from CNN as proof.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Supporting materials to Project Veritas' well-known long history of misleading edits?
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You said they report a lot of things that are not true. So where is your materials proving that they report a lot of things that are not true?

On the second, and opposite item:

1. There was only one report of questionable edits.

2. The questionable edits did not prove that something was not true, and no one has been able to successfully sue them for defamation. Fact.

3. Mainstream Media hate to admit it, but they have never been able to prove Project Veritas stories as false, and lose to PV time and time again in court. Which is why they constantly falsely claim that James O'keefe is a felon when in fact he is not. It is merely a way to try and get people to not follow his team's work.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
4 replies
Well, I know you have a problem with this concept in general, but once again: when any of their footage goes to a courtroom as evidence, the COURT finds that the footage has been too edited to be evidence of anything. And you may say they're the only report that the footage is bad, but again, as I've been telling over and over, the court's opinion is the one you're supposed to convince!!!
5 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Spicoli | STILL WAITING ON THOSE DETAILS PARTY DUDE | image tagged in spicoli | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
..... details.... of.... the court dismissal of the allegations?
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I mean, if you can't convince a court you were telling the truth, as Project Veritas could not, then what further details do you need? Although you and your buddies seem to have general trouble figuring out that convincing a court of law with real evidence is what actually counts.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Just because something isn't proven in court, YET!!!! Doesn't mean that it should just be ignored, nothing to worry about, nothing to see here.
When there is evidence of something, and the media, justice system, etc absolutely refuse to look into it further, you have to ask why.
Sure, maybe it's nothing. But chances are it IS something, and you should be worried.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Well, the court already looked at the allegations that PV was leveling and dismissed them, which means that legally, yes, these allegations are now dead. Otherwise that's double indemnity. So if their footage is legally worthless then what value DOES their work have? 🤷‍♀️
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"Well, I know you have a problem with this concept in general, but once again: when any of their footage goes to a courtroom as evidence, the COURT finds that the footage has been too edited to be evidence of anything. "

Any? Any, you say? The concept you clearly have a grasp of if providing proof to your claim. Which cases? Where did they happen? When did they happen? What was the outcome of those cases and was the data proven incorrect? Boi, you really stepped into it this time, mate.

Where are all the "Anys" you speak of? We're waiting. 😁
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Jesus you guys are so lazy. Several of the Project Veritas allegations went to court to press charges on the people they were "undercover" against but when the full, unedited footage was played it was clear that they had evidence of exactly nothing. That's why none of their work has led to any arrests. All it's done is to get YOU guys riled up.

And that's not MSM. That's not CNN. That's the legal fallout of their work. For more information, do some go***mn background reading.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
"Several" is your claim, and yet still not shred of supporting material for it. You are still failing at treading water, mate.

We are still waiting for your supporting materials Mr. Several. 😂
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
My supporting materials is the court cases you clearly didn't follow because you don't actually care enough about Project Veritas to see how they hold up in court. They didn't.
1 up, 3y
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You really suck at dancing. Youre like a Ginger with no rhythm. Admit you dont have any real information to support your claim and move on. You're being laughed at like it's a sport now. 😂
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I'm ready to be judged. It's pretty clear you just stop following what Project Veritas do after you stop watching their click clickbait videos.
0 ups, 3y
Truth can be a very tough concept in general.
2 ups, 3y
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT VERITAS REPORTS THAT AEGIS LIVING KILLED A WOMAN IN THEIR CARE. PARADOX3713; THEY DRUGGED HER, INJECTED HER WITH THE COVID VACCINE WITHOUT CONSENT, AND IT KILLED HER.