A 2/3 supermajority of 10 votes is required for this to pass. The redrafted Constitution is in the comments.

Yes.

I will Vote yes. This will make the Stream more democratic. We do not need people to abuse their powers like a Dictator. We need this stream to be democratic where humans can have basic rights and freedom. This is all I have to say.

Yes. But I would like more of a Republic than a Democracy.

The changes: Added rule Vice President tie-breaking vote. Specified that trials for impeachments are not compulsory because we already voted to amend that part a while ago. Reduced the role of the owner by specifying they're not to interfere with trials, impeachments or Congress votes. Added section about Cabinet.

Yes

If necessary, my tie-breaking vote will be a yes vote.

Yes

I vote yes.

This seems reasonable. Congressman Getty votes AYE.

Article 1- President
Section 1: A President must be elected every 2 months during the last 2 days of the month. Candidates must have a running mate prior to the vote. The candidate with the most votes at the end of voting will be inaugurated the following day, on the first of the month.
Section 2: The President will be given moderator of the stream, and is not to be revoked unless convicted of a crime through impeachment.
Section 3: The President shall enforce stream rules as necessary.
Section 4: The President may appoint advisors to help enforce stream rules. This is not necessary, though it is helpful. The advisors enforce stream rules as necessary, but they hold no power.

Article 2: Vice President
Section 1: The VP Shall be elected as the president’s running mate.
Section 2: The VP Shall have mod, but only as long as their term lasts.
Section 3: If the president has been inactive for 3 or more days, the VP shall act as the Acting President. Or the President shall let the stream know if they are going to be inactive on certain dates, so the VP shall step in immediately.
Section 4: In case of a tie, the Vice President casts the tie-breaking vote.

Article 3: Head of Congress
Section 1: The HOC shall be given mod as long as their term lasts.
Section 2: The HOC with the most votes at the end of the election gets moderation rights.
Section 3: The HOC shall hold Joint congress sessions at least once a week to discuss and propose new laws.

Article 4: Congress
Section 1: Congress shall be formed of 15 members. The President, VP, and HOC shall pick 4 members each. The 3 Empty seats shall be filled by the runner ups. If they choose not to participate, Vacancies will be filled by the HOC.
Section 2: Congress shall propose and vote on rules for the stream. A simple majority (8-7) will pass normal bills, and the President will either enact it, or veto it. If the bill is vetoed, then ⅔ supermajority will pass it.
Section 3: ⅔ supermajorities are required for constitutional amendments and impeachments.
Section 4: Vacancies In congress shall be filled by who appointed them.
Section 5: Stream owners are NOT to interfere with Congressional votes.
Section 6: In case of a tie, the Vice President casts the tie breaking vote.

(continued below)

Article 5: Owner
Section 1: The Owner shall be responsible for holding elections and transfers of power. Nothing else. They are not to interfere with Congress votes, trials, or impeachments.
Section 2: Owners cannot remove an elected official without Congress voting with the necessary supermajority to impeach.

Article 6: Impeachment
Section 1: In order to remove a person in power, 2 Officials (President, VP, HOC, Member of Congress, or Owner) must call for an impeachment, what offense was committed, and who is responsible. A trial shall then be held by one of the judges from the Courtroom stream and after giving his verdict Congress shall vote, with a ⅔ supermajority required to impeach. Stream owners are NOT to interfere with this process.

Article 7: Trials
Section 1: One of the judges from the Courtroom stream is selected to hold a trial.
Section 2: The first judge to express interest gets the job.
Section 3: Congress acts as the jury.
Section 4: Stream owners are NOT to interfere with this process.

Article 8: Punishments
Section 1: The only punishments available are temporary or permanent bans.
Section 2: If a user posts something that breaks the rules, It is up to the President and other mods to enforce rules, but punishments are not necessary.
Section 3: Repeat offenders shall be Tried and charged on grounds of total disregard for the rules.
Section 4: The Jury shall vote to convict or not, and they can suggest their punishments to the judge,
Section 5: Anyone deleted by a global mod shall face a ban for 3 months from the time of their deletion, unless mods are permabanning the banned user from the site.
Section 6: if a person in power is punished, the owner can decide to suspend their mod for a certain amount of days. If the owner does a misdemeanor, the owner cannot get involved in the stream as the court decides.

Article 9: Voting
Section 1: All users are entitled to ONE VOTE. Multiple votes and alting will NOT BE TOLERATED.
Section 2: Elections will be held the last 2 days of the month, every 2 months.
Section 3: No user shall hold the same office in a year.
Section 4: Voters must register by following the stream, and filling out a google form that the owner put in the description of the stream.

(continued below)

What exactly is the role of the judge and of the jury?
What's the extant of punishment possible?
Oh, and if it's the first judge to express interest, any old schmuck could walk in and get the job....

The judges are the courtroom stream moderators. Calling them "any old schmuck" is an awful thing to say.

And who decides who moderates the courtroom stream?
Yes, I'm so awful aren't I ;)

I don't moderate the stream so don't ask me. But Envoy does mod it, and are you gonna call him an "old schmuck" too?
You're certainly acting like it right now. What's gotten into you?

Sure
You've just made me realize my love for tyrannizing the good people of this stream, like, I could've been tyrannizing them for so long, but I didn't. So much wasted time. But I won't waste time any longer >:)

Yikes. You really exposed yourself there. And I’m pretty sure that wasn’t sarcasm either.

No, I never use sarcasm, I genuinely enjoy tyrannizing the steram

That was genuine sarcasm. I know sarcasm when I see it.

Thank you XD
I know IncognitoGuy's gonna try and spin this, but at least someone can appreciate sarcasm XD

Article 10: Military forces
Section 1: Generals or Admirals of an official branch can promote troops to the next rank.
Section 2: The President can appoint Colonels to be Generals of their said branch.
Section 3: In times of war, The President shall appoint the highest ranking General to be the General of the Army.
Section 4: Troop Deployment, Attacks can only be authorised by the President (Or Acting President) and no one else.

​​Article 11: Cabinet
Section 1: The President can appoint any non-banned user to any position in his/her Cabinet. These users act as advisors who carry out specific roles in the administration.
Section 2: The President can order Cabinet secretaries in the line of succession as he pleases.

Oh and you don't really get to tell stream owners what to do lol

You stream owners really are tyrannical dictators. And I'm not counting temporary owner Wubbzymon because he was elected to the Presidency and isn't obnoxious or autocratic.

lol, remember when you were begging for me to take over again?
And I mean, kinda yeah, how do you think the stream hasn't fallen apart yet? Y'all have a habit of trying to re-enact the witch hunts

Well my thinking at the time was that anyone's better than Envoy (except AndrewFinlayson of course). But since you've come back you've been acting an awful lot like him.

Uh, even-keeled? Not prone to lynching someone at the first perceived offense? Trying to have an orderly trial?

That’s what I’m trying to do. You guys are trying to stop the trial going ahead and are helping Andy avoid punishment.

You couldn't even get the necessary amount of judges XD

What are you talking about? Luigi agreed to be the judge for the trial?

Why’ve you been acting so weird lately?

3-7 judges were necessary lol, and you know it

Define weird?

Nay (can a VP introduce a law/constitution?)
Sorry for the late response I thought I already voted.

I can. So can the President. For a Congressman to do it just contact the HOC so the vote can start. For anyone else they need approval from a Congressman to get it started.

Aye (ah sh*t, not in Congress)

Yes

12-1

Yea. Finlayson and Envoy’s tyranny has gone for too long.

Yes