I just wonder why it would be considered a better method of delivery. I mean, making cells make virus parts is what viruses do. It's how they reproduce. So if life were a sci-fi novel, the mRNA would definitely mutate, behave like a virus, and backfire. Presumably the vaccine doesn't contain enough information to replicate itself in it's entirety, so it won't reproduce and will die out after producing just enough parts to elicit an immune response.
My point is that this is different than traditional vaccines ( i.e. every other vaccine up to this point) and it's reasonable for people to be a little skeptical.
I'm not skeptical enough to not get it, as upcoming legislation will make it impossible to live you life without proof of vaccination, and I don't believe I could effectively "fight the machine".