Darwinism

Do you yourself even comprehend any of that lingo you're spouting ? 😏

It's an effect of a thing called informed intellect. You really should try it sometime.

But I will grant you I typo'd epithelium, I was rattling it off in haste. It's an element of the vascular system that gets abused by the Frankensteinian mRNA technique.

I take it you're a immunologist who's well versed in the complex mechanisms involved in immune function? 😏

They all are, as well as constitutional and defense lawyers. They are just bored and have to kill time between important appointments, so they bring their wisdom to a meme site, to point fingers, humiliate, and ridicule. You know, like a professional does.

More professionals need to put a foot down, show the boys how the men really work. Maybe some will wise up and find respect, others will sulk and keep slashing at strawman. It's a post-truth apocalypse. A few heads need to be cracked for civilization to return. 😉

My sci creds (and let's call a spade a spade: intellect too) are clearly in advance of people like you who simply bobblehead at whatever they're fed, so basically the adequate functional equivalent.

Doctors are no more in lockstep agreement on all issues than all lawyers - and fascinatingly, they are starting to really open their eyes to just what a scam the CDC and WHO have been pulling on their asses. Small wonder the jab refusal rate is as high among MD's and nurses as it is (meaning vastly higher than the lies you've been fed).

"I know more than the 'experts'" 🚩

Whatever you say, kid. Throw out some more big words to look smart. 😏

I don't disclose my creds on the net, but take my word for it, they probably exceed yours.

Trash talk is not argument. You dumped the latter for the former.

Solid indicator you're not intellectually equal to the most basic task before you here.

The wise can look at the decisions you've made to indicate your intelligence.

All this chest pounding... "Credentials" pffft...

I already pointed out you have no idea what you're talking about.

You have this grandiose mindset that if doctors and lawyers aren't in lockstep then your opinion is equally valid; you can choose whatever flavor of facts you want, right?

And that decision is like a loaded dice toss because you have no way of knowing or guaging which doctors have viable data (or the experience to even understand that data).

You're not interested in actually finding truth that could serve a beneficial purpose to the life decisions you make.

It's all political lockstep to you. 😊

Sure. Just like they could look at the "authorities" about the luminiferous ether years ago and dismiss anyone who defied the dogma.

I don't pick and choose. I examine for myself, and when I see junk reasoning in the mainstream bogus orthodoxy, I call it out.

Argument from authority is a logical fallacy. I understand this. You do not.

"Pfft" is the sound of sour excuse for actual scientific reasoning being deflated.

Let's just say hypothetically you were discussing a topic with someone who has 10,000 hours of dedicated study of mastering that subject and its supporting subjects. Would you be boasting and asserting your "superior intellect" like you are now? Still believe you have the most facts? Still believe you truly grasp the facts and the big picture? 😏

You're just like every other narcissist, and their "very very large... Uh, Brain"

Don't even understand that logical fallacy...🦜 😆

typing here, since can't reply directly this far down the thread to menace4U

Yes, I am asserting that I am right about a subject where literally tens or hundreds of thousands of MDs and MD-PhD's are incorrect.

You call that egotism. But only you are emotionally invested in the subject, I am not. See, that should be enough right there, but the only thing - demonstrating your mental error back at you - that would even remotely convince you otherwise is NOT an ad rem discussion of the facts (science), but the fact that approaching an equal number of medical professionals ARE calling BS on the first batch.

Which means you, not I, are doing the authority selectivity game.

The difference between us is, my opinion is shaped by the emergent facts, IRRESPECTIVE of whether or not a bunch of MDs take my position or not.

Here's a meme with your "logic" back at you.

douche

BTW... You can shove that right up yours.

Triggered much? You just cant walk away, can you? Maturity verified!

Yep. I called it...

Douche