Proposing violence against women is never funny.

I thought it was disgusting and said so at the time. I just checked my memory. The only Democrat who let Griffin off the hook was Al Franken, who proved to be a creep on his own merit, or lack thereof. I knew you would dig deep for a false-equivalency, and make up a lie to accompany it. To quote a song I wrote years ago, you "lived up to my low expectations."

Dig deep?? What drugs are you on, Larry? I don't have to dig deep to find hyperbolic rhetoric against Trump. It is everywhere, especially here on imgflip.
YOU are the one who constantly use "false- equivalency" in your never-ending propaganda campaign.

It's hilarious, she already got beat with and ugly stick

Men who beat women or condone the beating of women, transcend politics in earning my disrespect. I would defend any woman, including Marjorie Taylor-Greene, against a physical attack by any man. Normal people have lines they will not cross, even in politics.

And yet you don't condemn the beating of a man this vociferously. If we agree that men are equal to women then they should equally be able to handle physical confrontation... and jokes about physical confrontation.

But seemingly they can't? That mindset seems a bit sexist to me...

And, yet you don't know what the hell you are talking about. First, go back to school. Learn the difference between "equality under the law," and sameness. Then, stop lying about thinks I do not do or say, in order to defend this sexist pig McCarthy.

Seems like my comment somehow poofed… allow me to try again.

Unless you have a doctorate with a few extra credit hours to boot, I can assure you I have undergone more and higher education. I can also assure you, that I need none of my degrees to logically work out that if a person believes a woman can't handle a joke the same as a man can... that's sexist.

The difference between equality under the law (as it applies to men and women being equal, I assume?; that phrase might not mean what you thought it meant) and gender equality ("sameness", as you called it) is moot for the purposes of this discussion. The legality of expecting a woman to be able handle the same situations as a man are the same as general society in America... women are expected to be equal in every way, shape and form (aside from child birth; although idiots are debating that as well these days)… period. Deviating from that implies one is sexist, discriminatory and is punishable by many of the more current laws written/implemented within the past several decades.

So basically... pick a stance and stick with it. Either women are equal to men, able to fulfil any function and rise to any challenge a man can... or women are a privileged class that requires special rules that apply to only them. I don't particularly care which you pick... but waffling back and fourth between them is disingenuous, hypocritical and logically inconsistent.

I don't give a whit about McCarthy... because I'm not a Republican, I don't know the guy and he is not my representative. However, this goo-goo, gah-gah baby mentality of picking and choosing who to be mad at for some things when ignoring them when they occur within your own in-group is ridiculous. You selectively and over-dramatically act as though the words are the acts themselves then screech about them... until someone you like does it... then silence. At the very least, I can remain consistent in my core beliefs and call both sides an idiot when they are obviously being such.

I hope your next meme is about Cuomo... about the things he said AND ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY DID to women... because you seem to be a real champion of women, right? Surely this wasn't all just a politically tribal cherry picking of virtue signaling outrage... right?